SNPdryad: Predicting deleterious non-synonymous human SNPs using only orthologous protein sequences

Bioinformatics

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1112-1119

  Wong, Ka Chun ^a,b   Zhang, Zhaolei ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; BIOLOGY; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; HUMAN; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PROTEOME; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84898852770     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt769     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abecasis, G.R. et al. (2010) A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature, 467, 1061-1073.
2. Adzhubei, I.A. et al. (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods, 7, 248-249.
3. Altshuler, D.M. et al. (2010) Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature, 467, 52-58.
4. Amberger, J. et al. (2009) McKusick's online mendelian inheritance in man (OMIM). Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D793-D796.
5. Axelsen, J.B. et al. (2007) Parameters of proteome evolution from histograms of amino-acid sequence identities of paralogous proteins. Biol. Direct, 2, 32.
6. Bishop, C.M. (1995) Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
7. Bordo, D. and Argos, P. (1991) Suggestions for "safe" residue substitutions in site-directed mutagenesis. J. Mol. Biol., 217, 721-729.
8. Breiman, L. (2001) Random forests. Mach. Learn., 45, 5-32.
9. Bromberg, Y. et al. (2008) SNAP predicts effect of mutations on protein function. Bioinformatics, 24, 2397-2398.
10. Burges, C.J.C. (1998) A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 2, 121-167.
11. Caruana, R. et al. (2008) An empirical evaluation of supervised learning in high dimensions. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '08, p. 96-103, ACM, New York, NY, USA.
12. Chothia, C. (1976) The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 105, 1-12.
13. Cooper, G.F. and Herskovits, E. (1992) A bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Mach. Learn., 9, 309-347.
14. Cooper, G.M. and Hausman, R.E. (2007) The Cell: A Molecular Approach. 4th edn. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA, USA.
15. Cover, T. and Hart, P. (1967) Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 13, 21-27.
16. Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 1792-1797.
17. Filmore, D. (2004) It's a GPCR world. Mod. Drug Discov., 7, 24-28.
18. Freund, Y. and Schapire, R.E. (1996) Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm. In: Lorenza, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 1996). Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 148-156.
19. Gonzalez-Perez, A. and Lopez-Bigas, N (2011) Improving the assessment of the outcome of nonsynonymous SNVs with a consensus deleteriousness score, Condel. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 88, 440-449.
20. Guindon, S. et al. (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol., 59, 307-321.
21. Hall, M. et al. (2009) The weka data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11, 10-18.
22. Hicks, S. et al. (2011) Prediction of missense mutation functionality depends on both the algorithm and sequence alignment employed. Hum. Mutat., 32, 661-668.
23. Hulo, N. et al. (2006) The PROSITE database. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D227-D230.
24. John, G.H. and Langley, P. (1995) Estimating continuous distributions in bayesian classifiers. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, UAI '95, p 338-345. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
25. Johnson, A. et al. (2011) RNA structures affected by single nucleotide polymorphisms in transcribed regions of the human genome. WebmedCentral Bioinformatics, 2, WMC001600.
26. Karplus, P.A. (1997) Hydrophobicity regained. Protein Sci., 6, 1302-1307.
27. Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. et al. (2007) A "silent" polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science, 315, 525-528.
28. Kumar, S. et al. (2009) Positional conservation and amino acids shape the correct diagnosis and population frequencies of benign and damaging personal amino acid mutations. Genome Res., 19, 1562-1569.
29. Kyte, J. and Doolittle, R.F. (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol., 157, 105-132.
30. Lin, M.F. et al. (2011) Locating protein-coding sequences under selection for additional, overlapping functions in 29 mammalian genomes. Genome Res., 21, 1916-1928.
31. Li, M.X. et al. (2012) A comprehensive framework for prioritizing variants in exome sequencing studies of Mendelian diseases. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, e53.
32. Li, M.X. et al. (2013) Predicting mendelian disease-causing non-synonymous single nucleotide variants in exome sequencing studies. PLoS Genet., 9, e1003143.
33. Liu, X. et al. (2013) dbNSFP v2.0: a database of human non-synonymous SNVs and their functional predictions and annotations. Hum. Mutat., 34, E2393-E2402.
34. Lohmueller, K.E. et al. (2008) Proportionally more deleterious genetic variation in European than in African populations. Nature, 451, 994-997.
35. Magrane, M. and Consortium, U. (2011) UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data. Database, 2011, bar009.
36. Mihalek, I. et al. (2004) A family of evolution-entropy hybrid methods for ranking protein residues by importance. J. Mol. Biol., 336, 1265-1282.
37. Ng, P.C. and Henikoff, S. (2003) SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3812-3814.
38. Ostlund, G. et al. (2010) InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 38, 196-203.
39. Punta, M. et al. (2012) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D290-D301.
40. Reichert, J. and Suhnel, J. (2002) The IMB jena image library of biological macro-molecules: 2002 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 253-254.
41. Schaefer, C. et al. (2012) SNPdbe: constructing an nsSNP functional impacts database. Bioinformatics, 28, 601-602.
42. Schwarz, J.M. et al. (2010) MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat. Methods, 7, 575-576.
43. Shabalina, S.A. et al. (2013) Sounds of silence: synonymous nucleotides as a key to biological regulation and complexity. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, 2073-2094.
44. Sherry, S.T. et al. (2001) dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 308-311.
45. Stranger, B.E. et al. (2007) Relative impact of nucleotide and copy number variation on gene expression phenotypes. Science, 315, 848-853.
46. Sunyaev, S. et al. (2001) Prediction of deleterious human alleles. Hum. Mol. Genet., 10, 591-597.
47. Wilson, D. et al. (2009) SUPERFAMILY-sophisticated comparative genomics, data mining, visualization and phylogeny. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D380-D386.
48. Xie, X. et al. (2005) Systematic discovery of regulatory motifs in human promoters and 3 UTRs by comparison of several mammals. Nature, 434, 338-345.
49. Yue, P. et al. (2006) SNPs3D: candidate gene and SNP selection for association studies. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 166.
50. Zamyatnin, A.A. (1972) Protein volume in solution. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 24, 107-123.