An empirical evaluation of supervised learning in high dimensions

Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 96-103

  Caruana, Rich ^a   Karampatziakis, Nikos ^a   Yessenalina, Ainur ^a  

^a Department of Computer Science and School of Operations Research and Information Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; DECISION TREES; MACHINE LEARNING; SUPERVISED LEARNING; EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MARINE BIOLOGY; ROBOT LEARNING;

EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; HIGH DIMENSIONAL DATA; HIGH DIMENSIONS; RANDOM FORESTS; RELATIVE PERFORMANCE;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; HIGH DIMENSIONS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DATUM; NEURAL NETS; RANDOM FORESTS; RELATIVE PERFORMANCE;

EID: 56449089785     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1390156.1390169     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bauer, E., & Kohavi, R. (1999). An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants. MLJ, 36, 105-139.
2. Bordes, A., Ertekin, S., Weston, J., & Bottou, L. (2005). Fast kernel classifiers with online and active learning. JMLR, 6, 1579-1619.
3. Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. MLJ, 45, 5-32.
4. Caruana, R., & Niculescu-Mizil, A. (2006). An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. ICML '06, 161-168.
5. Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. (1999). Large Margin Classification Using the Perception Algorithm. MLJ, 37, 277-296.
6. Genkin, A., Lewis, D., & Madigan, D. (2006). Large-scale bayesian logistic regression for text categorization. Technometrics.
7. Joachims, T. (2006). Training linear SVMs in linear time. SIGKDD, 217-226.
8. King, R., Feng, C., & Shutherland, A. (1995). Statlog: comparison of classification algorithms on large real-world problems. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 9, 259-287.
9. Le Cun, Y., Bottou, L., Orr, G. B., & Müller, K.-R. (1998). Efficient backprop. In Neural networks, tricks of the trade, LNCS 1524. Springer Verlag.
10. LeCun, Y., Jackel, L., Bottou, L., Brunot, A., Cortes, C., Denker, J., Drucker, H., Guyon, I., Muller, U., Sackinger, E., et al. (1995). Comparison of learning algorithms for handwritten digit recognition. International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 60.
11. Niculescu-Mizil, A., & Caruana, R. (2005). Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning. ICML '05, 625-632.
12. Platt, J. (1999). Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, 10.
13. Provost, F. J., & Fawcett, T. (1997). Analysis and visualization of classifier performance: Comparison under imprecise class and cost distributions. KDD '97 (pp. 43-48).
14. Shalev-Shwartz, S., Singer, Y., & Srebro, N. (2007). Pegasos: Primal estimated sub-gradient solver for svm. ICML '07 (pp. 807-814).
15. Zadrozny, B., & Elkan, C. (2002). Transforming classifier scores into accurate multiclass probability estimates. KDD '02, 694-699.