Redesign of a gamified Software Engineering course

2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 778-786

  Thomas, Christoph ^a   Berkling, Kay ^a  

^a BADEN WUERTTEMBERG COOPERATIVE STATE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

blended learning; e learning; education; gamification; motivation; software engineering

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; EDUCATION; MOTIVATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STUDENTS; TEACHING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

BLENDED LEARNING; DESIGN CRITERIA; GAMIFICATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING COURSE; STUDENT MOTIVATION;

CURRICULA;

EID: 84898626706     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICL.2013.6644707     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. K. Berkling and Zundel, A, Understanding the Challenges of Introducing Self-driven Blended Learning in a Restrictive Ecosystem-Step 1 for Change Management: Understanding Student Motivation, CSEDU 2013, 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, SciTePress, to appear 2013.
2. K. Berkling and Ch. Thomas, Gamification of a Software Engineering Course-And a detailed analysis of the factors that lead to it's failure. Submitted to ICL 2013, 16th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning and 42 International Conference on Engineering Pedagogy, 2013.
3. D. H. Pink, Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Canongate, 2010.
4. J. Kruger and D. Dunning, Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated selfassessments. Journal of personality and social psychology 77. 6, 1999, pp. 1121-1134.
5. D. R. Krathwohl, A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 2002, 212-218.
6. E. Thompson, A. Luxton-Reilly, J. L. Whalley, M. Hu, and P. Robbins, Bloom's taxonomy for CS assessment, Proceedings of the tenth conference on Australasian computing education-Volume 78 (pp. 155-161). Australian Computer Society, January 2008.
7. Available http://www. flippedclassroom. com/, retrieved: 16. 04. 2013.
8. H. Singh, Building effective blended learning programs, Educational Technology-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs, NJ-43. 6, 2003, 51-54.
9. G. Veletsianos and C. Navarrete. "Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities. ", The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13. 1, 2012, pp. 144-166.
10. Clow, Doug (2013). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In: Third Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK 2013), Leuven, Belgium, 2013, pp. 8-12.
11. P. Dillenbourg, Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. Elsevier Science, Inc., PO Box 945, Madison Square Station, New York, NY 10160-0757, 1999.
12. M. M. Chiu, Group ProblemSolving Processes: Social Interactions andIndividual Actions., Journal for the theory of social behaviour 30. 1, 2000, pp. 26-49.
13. Schmidt, B. Learning Strategy and Students' Perception of Different Learning Options in a Blended Learning Environment, CSEDU 2013, 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, SciTePress, to appear 2013.
14. E. Von Glasersfeld, Constructivism in education, Oxford, England: Pergamon Press., 1989, p. 162.
15. H. Bauersfeld, The structuring of the structures: Development and function of mathematizing as a social practice. Universität Bielefeld, Institut für Didaktik der Mathematik, 1990.
16. G. Siemens, Connectivism: Learning and knowledge today, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 9. 3, 2006, pp. 1-13.
17. Sawyer, R. Keith, ed. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Vol. 2. No. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
18. Santo, Susan A. "Relationships between learning styles and online learning. " Performance Improvement Quarterly 19. 3, 2006, pp. 73-88.
19. Grasha, Anthony F. "A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator, and delegator. " College teaching 42. 4, 1994, pp. 142-149.
20. Fuhrmann, B. Schneider and A. F. Grasha. A practical handbook for college teachers. Boston: Little, Brown, 1983.
21. D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning theory and the learning style inventory: A reply to Freedman and Stumpf. Academy of Management Review, 1981, pp. 289-296.
22. J. Tagg, The Learning Paradigm College. Anker Publishing Company, Inc., 176 Ballville Road, PO Box 249, Bolton, MA 01740-0249, 2003.
23. K. van Overveld and T. Verhoeff, Self-consistent Peer Ranking for Assessing Student Work-Dealing with Large Populations, CSEDU 2013, 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, SciTePress, to appear 2013.
24. Available online: http://www. sakaiproject. org/sakai-products, retrieved: 24. 04. 2013.
25. Available online: https://oae-community. sakaiproject. org/, retrieved: 25. 04. 2013.