Understanding the challenges of introducing self-driven blended learning in a restrictive ecosystem: Step 1 for change management: Understanding student motivation

CSEDU 2013 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 311-320

  Berkling, Kay ^a   Zundel, Armin ^b  

^a BADEN WUERTTEMBERG COOPERATIVE STATE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b INLINE Internet Online Dienste GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Blended Learning; Ecosystem of Learning; Education; Problem based Learning; Self directed Learning; Software Engineering

Indexed keywords

BLENDED LEARNING; EXPLORATORY SURVEYS; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; MOTIVATION FACTORS; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING COURSE; STUDENT MOTIVATION;

COMPENSATION (PERSONNEL); COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; ECOSYSTEMS; EDUCATION; MANAGEMENT; MOTIVATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84887130657     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bekele, T. A. (2010). Motivation and Satisfaction in Internet-Supported Learning Environments: A Review. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (2), 116-127.
2. Bloom, Benjamin. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay, 1956.
3. Charles, T., Bustard, D. and Black, M. (2011). Experiences of Promoting Student Engagement Through Game-Enhanced Learning. Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, 425-445.
4. Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (2012). Overview of self-determination theory. The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation, 85.
5. Derntl, M. and Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2005). The role of structure, patterns, and people in blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(2), 111-130.
6. Gagné, M. and Deci, E. L. (2005). SelfDdetermination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
7. Garrison, D. R. and Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105.
8. Goel, S. and Sharda, N. (2004). What Do Engineers Want? Examining Engineering Education through Bloom's Taxonomy. Online Submission.
9. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, http://www.publicationshare.com/graham intro. pdf
10. Hall, S. R., Waitz, I., Brodeur, D. R., and Soderholm., D. H., and Nasr, R. (2002). Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class. In Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual (Vol. 1, pp. T2A-9). IEEE.
11. Heidenreich, K. (2011). Erwartungen der Wirtschaft an Hochschulabsolventen. DIHK, Berlin.
12. Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth.
13. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.
14. Lepper, M. R., Henderlong, J. and Gingras, I. (1999). Understanding the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation-Uses and abuses of meta-anlysis: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999).
15. Lynch, R. and Dembo, M. (2004). The Relationship Between Self-Regulation and Online Learning in a Blended Learning Context. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distance Learning, 5(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/ article/view/189/271
16. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370.
17. McGonigal, J. (2012) Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. Penguin, London, 2011.
18. Mohammad, S. and Job, M. A. (2012). Confidence-Motivation-Satisfaction- Performance (CMSP) Analysis of Blended Learning System in the Arab Open University Bahrain.
19. Pink, D. H. (2010). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Canongate.
20. Rebitzer, J. B. and Taylor, L. J. (2011). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motives: Standard and behavioral approaches to agency and labor markets. Handbook of Labor Economics, 4, 701-772.
21. Rheinberg, F. (2006). Intrinsische Motivation und Flow-Erleben. Motivation und Handeln, 331-354
22. Schober, A. and Keller, L. (2012). Impact factors for learner motivation in Blended Learning environments. International Journal Of Emerging Technologies In Learning (IJET), 7(S2). Retrieved December 7, 2012, from http://online-journals.org/i-jet/article/view/2326
23. Scott Rigby, C., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C. and Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 165-185.
24. Seligman, M. E. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: an introduction. American Psychologist; American Psychologist, 55(1), 5.
25. Shea, P. and Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731.
26. Thompson, E., Luxton-Reilly, A., Whalley, J. L., Hu, M., and Robbins, P. (2008, January). Bloom's taxonomy for CS assessment. In Proceedings of the tenth conference on Australasian computing education-Volume 78 (pp. 155-161). Australian Computer Society, Inc.
27. Tuan, H. L. and Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654.
28. Zichermann, G. and Linder J. (2010). Game-Based Marketing: Inspire Customer Loyalty Through Rewards, Challenges, and Contests. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010.