Self-consistent peer ranking for assessing student work: Dealing with large populations

CSEDU 2013 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 399-404

  Van Overveld, Kees ^a   Verhoeff, Tom ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Large Scale Assessment; Peer Reviewing; Ranking Algorithm

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED SUPPORT; EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY; LARGE SCALE ASSESSMENT; PEER REVIEWING; RANKING ALGORITHM; REVIEWING PROCESS; UNDERGRADUATE COURSES; WEB-BASED EDUCATION;

ALGORITHMS; EDUCATION COMPUTING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84887192845     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Allain, R., Abbot, D., and Deardorff, D. (2006). Using peer ranking to enhance student writing. Physics Education, 41 (3): 255-258.
2. Golub, G. H. and Van Loan, C. F. (1996). Matrix Computations (3rd Ed.). JHU Press.
3. Kleinberg, J. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5): 604-632.
4. Lu, R. and Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. J. of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2): 100-115.
5. Mellenbergh, G. J. (2011). A Conceptual Introduction to Psychometrics: Development, Analysis, and Application of Psychological and Educational Tests. Eleven International Publishing.
6. Sadler, P. M. and Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1): 1-31.
7. 3, http://peach3.nl/.
8. van Zundert, M. J. (2012). Conditions of Peer Assessment for Complex Learning. PhD thesis, Maastricht University.