Quantum mechanical calculation of noncovalent interactions: A large-scale evaluation of PMx, DFT, and SAPT approaches

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1563-1575

  Li, Amanda ^a,b   Muddana, Hari S ^a   Gilson, Michael K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898490480     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: 15499626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct401111c     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Wang, W.; Donini, O.; Reyes, C. M.; Kollman, P. A. Biomolecular simulations: Recent developments in force fields, simulations of enzyme catalysis, protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-nucleic acid noncovalent interactions Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2001, 30, 211-243
2. Gainza, P.; Roberts, K. E.; Georgiev, I.; Lilien, R. H.; Keedy, D. A.; Chen, C.-Y.; Reza, F.; Anderson, A. C.; Richardson, D. C.; Richardson, J. S.; Donald, B. R. OSPREY: Protein design with ensembles, flexibility, and provable algorithms Methods Enzymol. 2013, 523, 87-107
3. Lifson, S. Consistent force field for calculations of conformations, vibrational spectra, and enthalpies of cycloalkane and n-alkane molecules J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 5116-5129
4. Levitt, M.; Lifson, S. Refinement of protein conformations using a macromolecular energy minimization procedure J. Mol. Biol. 1969, 46, 269-279
5. Hagler, A. T.; Huler, E.; Lifson, S. Energy functions for peptides and proteins. I. Derivation of a consistent force field including the hydrogen bond from amide crystals J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 5319-5327
6. Jorgensen, W. L.; Tirado-Rives, J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1657-1666
7. Cornell, W. D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C. I.; Gould, I. R.; Merz, K. M.; Ferguson, D. M.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Fox, T.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179-5197
8. Ponder, J. W.; Case, D. A. Force fields for protein simulations Adv. Protein Chem. 2003, 66, 27-85
9. Mackerell, A. D. Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: Overview and issues J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1584-604
10. Shi, Y.; Xia, Z.; Zhang, J.; Best, R.; Wu, C.; Ponder, J. W.; Ren, P. Polarizable atomic multipole-based AMOEBA force field for proteins J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 4046-4063
11. Paton, R. S.; Goodman, J. M. Hydrogen bonding and pi-stacking: How reliable are force fields? A critical evaluation of force field descriptions of nonbonded interactions J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 944-55
12. Sherrill, C. D.; Sumpter, B. G.; Sinnokrot, M. O.; Marshall, M. S.; Hohenstein, E. G.; Walker, R. C.; Gould, I. R. Assessment of standard force field models against high-quality ab initio potential curves for prototypes of pi-pi, CH/pi, and SH/pi interactions J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2187-93
13. Huang, L.; Roux, B. Automated force field parameterization for nonpolarizable and polarizable atomic models based on ab initio target data J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 3543-3556
14. Mayne, C. G.; Saam, J.; Schulten, K.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Gumbart, J. C. Rapid parameterization of small molecules using the force field toolkit J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 2757-2770
15. Yilmazer, N. D.; Korth, M. Comparison of molecular mechanics, semi-empirical quantum mechanical, and density functional theory methods for scoring protein-ligand interactions J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 8075-84
16. Muddana, H. S.; Varnado, C. D.; Bielawski, C. W.; Urbach, A. R.; Isaacs, L.; Geballe, M. T.; Gilson, M. K. Blind prediction of host-guest binding affinities: A new SAMPL3 challenge J. Comput.-Aided. Mol. Des. 2012, 26, 475-87
17. Muddana, H. S.; Gilson, M. K. Prediction of SAMPL3 host-guest binding affinities: Evaluating the accuracy of generalized force-fields J. Comput. Aided. Mol. Des. 2012, 26, 517-25
18. Grimme, S. Supramolecular binding thermodynamics by dispersion-corrected density functional theory Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18, 9955-9964
19. Muddana, H. S.; Gilson, M. K. Calculation of host-guest binding affinities using a quantum-mechanical energy model J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 2023-2033
20. Fanfrlík, J.; Bronowska, A. K.; Rezác, J.; Prenosil, O.; Konvalinka, J.; Hobza, P. A reliable docking/scoring scheme based on the semiempirical quantum mechanical PM6-DH2 method accurately covering dispersion and H-bonding: HIV-1 protease with 22 ligands J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 12666-12678
21. Raha, K.; Merz, K. M. Large-scale validation of a quantum mechanics based scoring function: predicting the binding affinity and the binding mode of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4558-4575
22. Ilatovskiy, A. V.; Abagyan, R.; Kufareva, I. Quantum mechanics approaches to drug research in the era of structural chemogenomics Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2013, 113, 1669-1675
23. Jurecka, P.; Sponer, J.; Cerný, J.; Hobza, P. Benchmark database of accurate (MP2 and CCSD(T) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 1985-1993
24. Korth, M.; Grimme, S. "Mindless" DFT benchmarking J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 993-1003
25. Burns, L. A.; Vázquez-Mayagoitia, A.; Sumpter, B. G.; Sherrill, C. D. Density-functional approaches to noncovalent interactions: A comparison of dispersion corrections (DFT-D), exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) theory, and specialized functionals J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 084107
26. Hohenstein, E. G.; Sherrill, C. D. Wavefunction methods for noncovalent interactions WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 304-326
27. Hostaš, J.; Řezáč, J.; Hobza, P. On the performance of the semiempirical quantum mechanical PM6 and PM7 methods for noncovalent interactions Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 568-569, 161-166
28. Dilabio, G. a; Johnson, E. R.; Otero-de-la-Roza, A. Performance of conventional and dispersion-corrected density-functional theory methods for hydrogen bonding interaction energies Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 12821-12828
29. Řezáč, J.; Jurečka, P.; Riley, K. E.; Černý, J.; Valdes, H.; Pluháčková, K.; Berka, K.; Řezáč, T.; Pitoňák, M.; Vondrášek, J.; Hobza, P. Quantum chemical benchmark energy and geometry database for molecular clusters and complex molecular systems (www.begdb.com): A users manual and examples Collect. Czechoslov. Chem. Commun. 2008, 73, 1261-1270
30. Stewart, J. J. P. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods V: Modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements J. Mol. Model. 2007, 13, 1173-1213
31. Stewart, J. J. P. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods VI: More modifications to the NDDO approximations and re-optimization of parameters J. Mol. Model. 2013, 19, 1-32
32. Korth, M.; Piton, M.; Pitoňák, M.; Řezá č, J.; Hobza, P. A transferable H-bonding correction for semiempirical quantum-chemical methods J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 344-352
33. Řezáč, J.; Fanfrlík, J.; Salahub, D.; Hobza, P. Semiempirical quantum chemical PM6 method augmented by dispersion and H-bonding correction terms reliably describes various types of noncovalent complexes J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 1749-1760
34. Korth, M. Third-generation hydrogen-bonding corrections for semiempirical QM methods and force fields J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 3808-3816
35. Řezáč, J.; Hobza, P. A halogen-bonding correction for the semiempirical PM6 method Chem. Phys. Lett. 2011, 506, 286-289
36. Becke, A. D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652
37. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785-789
38. Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1787-1799
39. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other function Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215-241
40. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104
41. Chai, J.; Head-Gordon, M. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom-atom dispersion corrections Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6615-6620
42. Jeziorski, B.; Moszynski, R.; Szalewicz, K. Perturbation theory approach to intermolecular potential energy surfaces of van der Waalscomplexes Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 1887-1930
43. Řezáč, J.; Hobza, P. Extrapolation and scaling of the DFT-SAPT interaction energies toward the basis set limit J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 685-689
44. McDaniel, J. G.; Schmidt, J. R. Physically-motivated force fields from symmetry-adapted perturbation theory J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 2053-2066
45. Gráfová, L.; Pitoňák, M.; Řezáč, J.; Hobza, P. Comparative study of selected wave function and density functional methods for noncovalent interaction energy calculations using the extended S22 data set J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 2365-2376
46. Rezáč, J.; Riley, K. E.; Hobza, P. S66: A well-balanced database of benchmark interaction energies relevant to biomolecular structures J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 2427-2438
47. Řezáč, J.; Riley, K. E.; Hobza, P. Benchmark calculations of noncovalent interactions of halogenated molecules J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 4285-4292
48. Řezáč, J.; Hobza, P. Advanced corrections of hydrogen bonding and dispersion for semiempirical quantum mechanical methods J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 141-151
49. Berka, K.; Laskowski, R.; Riley, K. E.; Hobza, P.; Vondráš ek, J. Representative amino acid side chain interactions in proteins. A comparison of highly accurate correlated ab initio quantum chemical and empirical potential procedures J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 982-992
50. Sedlak, R.; Janowski, T.; Pitoňák, M.; Rezáč, J.; Pulay, P.; Hobza, P. The accuracy of quantum chemical methods for large noncovalent complexes J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 3364-3374
51. Dunning, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007
52. Kendall, R. A.; Dunning, T. H.; Harrison, R. J. Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 6796
53. Woon, D. E.; Dunning, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. III. The atoms aluminum through argon J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 1358
54. Wilson, A. K.; Woon, D. E.; Peterson, K. A.; Dunning, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. IX. The atoms gallium through krypton J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 7667
55. Řezáč, J.; Hobza, P. Describing noncovalent interactions beyond the common approximations: How accurate is the "gold standard," CCSD(T) at the complete basis set limit? J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 2151-2155
56. Stewart, J. J. P. MOPAC2012. http://openmopac.net/.
57. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery, Jr., J. A.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.; Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov, V. N.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Millam, J. M.; Klene, M.; Knox, J. E.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Farkas, Ö.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V; Cioslowski, J.; Fox, D. J. Gaussian 09, Revision C.01. Gaussian, Inc: Wallingford, CT, 2009, 34.
58. DiLabio, G. A.; Johnson, E. R.; Otero-de-la-Roza, A. Performance of conventional and dispersion-corrected density-functional theory methods for hydrogen bonding interaction energies Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 12821-12828
59. Grimme, S.; Ehrlich, S.; Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1456-1465
60. Turney, J. M.; Simmonett, A. C.; Parrish, R. M.; Hohenstein, E. G.; Evangelista, F. a.; Fermann, J. T.; Mintz, B. J.; Burns, L. a.; Wilke, J. J.; Abrams, M. L.; Russ, N. J.; Leininger, M. L.; Janssen, C. L.; Seidl, E. T.; Allen, W. D.; Schaefer, H. F.; King, R. a.; Valeev, E. F.; Sherrill, C. D.; Crawford, T. D. Psi4: An open-source ab initio electronic structure program WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 556-565
61. Vondrásek, J.; Bendová, L.; Klusák, V.; Hobza, P. Unexpectedly strong energy stabilization inside the hydrophobic core of small protein rubredoxin mediated by aromatic residues: correlated ab initio quantum chemical calculations J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2615-2619
62. Accuracy within MOPAC2012. http://openmopac.net/Manual/PM6-accuracy.html.