Decreased Staphylococcus aureus and increased osteoblast density on nanostructured electrophoretic-deposited hydroxyapatite on titanium without the use of pharmaceuticals

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1775-1781

  Mathew, Dennis ^a   Bhardwaj, Garima ^a   Wang, Qi ^b   Sun, Linlin ^b   Ercan, Batur ^b   Geetha, Manisavagam ^a   Webster, Thomas J ^b,c  

^a VIT UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Bacteria; Electrophoretic deposition; Inhibition; Nanotechnology

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; CALCIFICATION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DENSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROPHILICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATERIAL COATING; NANOSTRUCTURED ELECTROPHORETIC DEPOSITION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSTEOBLAST; PLASMA SPRAY DEPOSITION; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

BACTERIA; ELECTROPHORETIC DEPOSITION; INHIBITION; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

CELL COUNT; CELL LINE; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DURAPATITE; ELECTROPHORESIS; ELECTROPLATING; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; OSTEOBLASTS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84898411853     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S55733     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Feng B, Weng J, Yang BC, Qu SX, Zhang XD. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblast. Biomaterials. 2003;24(25):4663-4670.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). FastStats: inpatient surgery [web page on the Internet]. Atlanta, GA: CDC; nd [last updated May 30, 2013]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/insurg.htm. Accessed November 19, 2013.
3. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):45-51.
4. Stanton T. Study points to savings with infection-screening program before TJR. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Now. 2010. Available from: http://www.aaos.org/news/aaosnow/mar10/clinical10. asp. Accessed November 19, 2013.
5. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry D, Parvizi J. Prosthetic joint infection risk after TKA in the Medicare population. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):52-56.
6. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(1):128-133.
7. Baquero F. Gram-positive resistance: challenge for the development of new antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;39 Suppl A:1-6.
8. Campoccia D, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance. Biomaterials. 2006;27(11):2331-2339.
9. Gottlieb T, Atkins BL, Shaw DR. Soft tissue, bone and joint infections. Med J Aust. 2002;176:609-615.
10. Manso M, Jiménez C, Morant C, Herrero P, Martínez-Duart JM. Elec-trodeposition of hydroxyapatite coatings in basic conditions. Biomateri-als. 2000;21(17):1755-1761.
11. Yu WQ, Jiang XQ, Zhang FQ, Xu L. The effect of anatase TiO2 nano-tube layers on MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;94(4):1012-1022.
12. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS, et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(7): 2130-2135.
13. Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 2007;7(6):1686-1691.
14. Puckett S. Select nanofabricated titanium materials for enhancing bone and skin growth of intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prostheses [doctoral dissertation]. Providence, RI: Brown University; 2010. Available from: https://repository.library.brown.edu/studio/item/ bdr:235/. Accessed November 19, 2013.
15. Puckett S, Pareta R, Webster TJ. Nano rough micron patterned titanium for directing osteoblast morphology and adhesion. Int J Nanomedicine. 2008;3(2):229-241.
16. Bjursten LM, Rasmusson L, Oh S, Smith GC, Brammer KS, Jin S. Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92(3):1218-1224.
17. von Wilmowsky C, Bauer S, Lutz R, et al. In vivo evaluation of anodic TiO2 nanotubes: an experimental study in the pig. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;89(1):165-171.
18. Ercan B, Kummer KM, Tarquinio KM, Webster TJ. Decreased Staphylococcus aureus biofilm growth on anodized nanotubular titanium and the effect of electrical stimulation. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(7): 3003-3012.
19. Ercan B, Taylor E, Alpaslan E, Webster TJ. Diameter of titanium nanotubes influences anti-bacterial efficacy. Nanotechnology. 2011;22(29):295102.
20. Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, Webster TJ. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials. 2010;31(4):706-713.
21. Alpaslan E, Ercan B, Webster TJ. Anodized 20 nm diameter nanotubular titanium for improved bladder stent applications. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:219-225.
22. Ercan B. Anodized nanotubular titanium as an orthopedic implant and the effect of electrical stimulation [doctoral dissertation]. Providence, RI: Brown University; 2011. Available from: https://repository.library. brown.edu/studio/item/bdr:11208/. Accessed November 19, 2013.
23. Puckett SD, Lee PP, Ciombor DM, Aaron RK, Webster TJ. Nanotextured titanium surfaces for enhancing skin growth on transcuta-neous osseointegrated devices. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(6):2352-2362.
24. Rajyalakshmi A, Ercan B, Balasubramanian K, Webster TJ. Reduced adhesion of macrophages on anodized titanium with select nanotube surface features. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:1765-1771.
25. Corni I, Ryan M P, Boccaccini AR. Electrophoretic deposition: from traditional ceramics to nanotechnology. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2008;28(7): 1353-1367.
26. Boccaccini AR, Keim S, Ma R, Li Y, Zhitomirsky I. Electrophoretic deposition of biomaterials. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7 Suppl 5: S581-S613.
27. Boccaccini AR, Zhitomirsky I. Application of electrophoretic and electrolytic deposition techniques in ceramic processing. Solid State and Materials Science. 2002;6(3):251-260.
28. Mohan L, Durgalakshmi D, Geetha M, Sankara Narayanan TS, Asokamani R. Electrophoretic deposition of nanocomposite (HAp + T i O 2) on titanium alloy for biomedical applications. Ceramics International. 2012;38:3435-3443.
29. Zhang Z, Dunn M F, Xiao TD, Tomsia AP, Saiz E. Nanostructured hydroxyapatite coatings for improved adhesion and corrosion resistance for medical implants. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc. 2002;703:291-296.
30. Zhitomirsky I, Gal-Or L. Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997;8(4):213-219.
31. Sato M, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. Enhanced osteoblast adhesion on hydrothermally treated hydroxyapatite/titania/poly(lactide-co-glycolide) sol-gel titanium coatings. Biomaterials. 2005;26(12):1349-1357.