Nanotextured titanium surfaces for enhancing skin growth on transcutaneous osseointegrated devices

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 2352-2362

  Puckett, Sabrina D ^a,c   Lee, Phin Peng ^a   Ciombor, Deborah M ^b,c   Aaron, Roy K ^b,c   Webster, Thomas J ^a,b,c  

^a Brown University   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Brown/VA Center for Restorative and Regenerative Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Keratinocyte; Nanotopography; Proliferation; Titanium

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON BEAMS; ELECTRONS; EVAPORATION; TITANIUM; YARN;

ANODIZATIONS; BIOLOGICALLY-INSPIRED; ELECTRON BEAM EVAPORATION; KERATINOCYTES; NANOTEXTURED; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANTS; PROLIFERATION; TITANIA SURFACES; TRANSCUTANEOUS;

ADHESION;

NANOTUBE; TITANIUM; BIOMATERIAL; NANOMATERIAL;

ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL DENSITY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; ELECTRON BEAM; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; KERATINOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MATERIALS TESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; SKIN; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; HUMANS; KERATINOCYTES; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SKIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 77956634850     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Mooney V, Schwartz SA, Roth AM, Gorniowsky MJ. Percutaneous implant devices. Ann Biomed Eng 1977;5:34-6.
2. von Recum AF. Applications and failure modes of percutaneous devices: a review. J Biomed Mater Res 1981;18:323-36.
3. Von Recum AF, Park JB. Permanent percutaneous devices. Crit Rev Bioeng 1981;5:37-77.
4. Dasse KA. Infection of percutaneous devices: prevention, monitoring, and treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1981;18:403-11.
5. Knabe C, Groβe-Siestrup C, Gross U. Histologic evaluation of a natural permanent percutaneous structure and clinical percutaneous devices. Biomaterials 1999;20:503-10.
6. Kevin C, Edelstein JE. Prosthetics and patient management: a comprehensive clinical approach. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.; 2006. p. 235.
7. Gristina AG. Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science 1987;237:1588-95.
8. Moroni A, Vannini F, Mosca M, Giannini S. Techniques to avoid pin loosening and infection in external fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:189-95.
9. Yokoyama K et al. Risk factors for deep infection in secondary intramedullary nailing after external fixation for open tibial fractures. Injury 2006;37:554-60.
10. Catagni MA, Ottaviani G, Combi A, Elhence A. External circular fixation: a comparison of infection rates between wires and conical half-pins with threads outside or inside the skin. J Trauma 2006;61:1186-91.
11. Marsh JL, Mahoney CR, Steinbronn D. External fixation of open humerus fractures. Iowa Orthop J 1999;19:35-42.
12. Stojkovic B, Milenkovic S, Radenkovic M, Stanojkovic M, Kostic I. Tibial shaft fractures treated by the external fixation method. Facta Universitatis. Med Biol 2006;13:145-7.
13. Midis N, Conti SF. Revision ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2002;23:243-7.
14. Piza G, Caja VL, Gonzalez-Viejo MA, Navarro A. Hydroxyapatite-coated external-fixation pins: the effect on pin loosening and pin-track infection in leg lengthening for short stature. J Bone Joint Surg 2004;86 B: 892-7.
15. Ahlborg HG, Josefsson PO. Pin-tract complications in external fixation of fractures of the distal radius. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70:116-8.
16. W-Dahl A, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lindstrand A. No difference between daily and weekly pin site care: a randomized study of 50 patients with external fixation. Acta Orthop Scand 2003;74:704-8.
17. Mahan J, Seligson D, Henry SL, Hynes P, Dobbins J. Factors in pin tract infections. Orthopedics 1991;14:305-8.
18. Zlowodzki M, Prakash JS, Aggarwal NK. External fixation of complex femoral shaft fractures. Int Orthop 2007;31:409-13.
19. Green SA, Ripley MJ. Chronic osteomyelitis in pin tracks. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:1092-8.
20. Mutsuzaki H, Ito A, Sakane M, Sogo Y, Oyane A, Ochiai N. Fibroblast growth factor-2-apatite composite layers on titanium screws to reduce pin tract infection rate. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;86 B: 365-74.
21. Bosetti M, Masse A, Tobin E, Cannas M. Silver coated materials for external fixation devices: in vitro biocompatibility and genotoxicity. Biomaterials 2002;23:887-92.
22. Collinge CA, Goll G, Seligson D, Easley KJ. Pin tract infections: silver vs. uncoated pins. Orthopedics 1994;17:445-8.
23. Wassall MA, Santin M, Isalberti C, Cannas M, Denyer SP. Adhesion of bacteria to stainless steel and silver-coated orthopedic external fixation pins. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:325-30.
24. Masse A, Bruno A, Bosetti M, Biasibetti A, Cannas M, Gallinaro P. Prevention of pin track infection in external fixation with silver coated pins: clinical and microbiological results. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 2000;53:600-4.
25. Arciola CR, Montanara L, Moroni A, Giordano M, Pizzoferrato A, Donati ME. Hydroxyapatite-coated orthopaedic screws as infection resistant materials: in vitro study. Biomaterials 1999;20:323-7.
26. Moronoi A, Caja VL, Egger EL, Trinchese L, Chao EYS. Histomorphometry of hydroxyapatite coated and uncoated porous titanium bone implants. Biomaterials 1994;15:926-30.
27. Placzek R, Ruffer M, Deuretzbacher G, Heijens E, Meiss AL. The fixation strength of hydroxyapatite-coated Schanz screws and standard stainless steel Schanz screws in lower extremity lengthening: a comparison based on a new torque value index: the fixation index. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006;126:369-73.
28. Moroni A, Heikkila J, Magyar G, Toksvig-Larsen S, Giannini S. Fixation strength and pin tract infection of hydroxyapatite-coated tapered pins. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;388:209-17. (Pubitemid 32595024)
29. Moroni A, Aspenberg P, Toksvig-Larsen S, Falzarano G, Giannini S. Enhanced fixation with hydroxyapatite-coated pins. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;346:171-7.
30. Moroni A, Cadossi M, Romagnoli M, Faldini C, Giannini S. A biomechanical and histological analysis of standard versus hydroxyapatite-coated pins for external fixation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;86 B: 417-21.
31. DeJong ES et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of external fixator pins coated with a lipid stabilized hydroxyapatite/chlorhexidine complex to prevent pin tract Infection in a goat model. J Trauma 2001;50:1008-14.
32. Al-Amoudi A, Dubochet J, Norlen L. Nanostructure of the epidermal extracellular space as observed by cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections of human skin. J Invest Dermatol 2005;124:764-77.
33. Horbett TA. Proteins: structure, properties and adsorption to surfaces. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FS, Lemmons JE, editors. Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials inmedicine. New York: Academic Press; 1996. p. 133.
34. Schakenraad JM. Cell: their surfaces and interactions with materials. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FS, Lemmons JE, editors. Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. New York: Academic Press; 1996. p. 133.
35. Deligianni DD, Katsala N, Ladas S, Sotiropoulou D, Amedee J, Missirlis YF. Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption. Biomaterials 2001;22:1241-51.
36. Brunette DM. The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:231-46.
37. Martin JY et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 2004;29:389-401.
38. Wen HB, Cui FZ. Microstructural features of non-union of human humeral shaft fracture. J Struct Biol 1997;119:239-46.
39. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Lausmaa J, Rodahl M, Kasemo B, Ericson LE. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different thicknesses and morphology. Biomaterials 1994;15:1062-74.
40. Bordji K et al. Cytocompatibility of Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-5Al-2.5Fe alloys according to three surface treatments, using human fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Biomaterials 1996;17:929-40.
41. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:475-83.
42. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001;7:291-301. (Pubitemid 32574927)
43. Yang Y, Glover R, Ong JL. Fibronectin adsorption on titanium surfaces and its effect on osteoblast precursor cell attachment. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2003;30:291-7. (Pubitemid 36870821)
44. Khang D, Lu J, Yao C, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. Biomaterials 2008;29:970-83.
45. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 2004;25:4731-9.
46. Yao C, Slamovich EB, Qazi JI, Rack HJ, Webster TJ. Improved bone cell adhesion on ultrafine grained titanium and Ti-6Al-4V. Ceram Trans 2005;159:239-46.
47. Ward BC, Webster TJ. Increased functions of osteoblasts on nanophase metals. Biomaterials 2007;27:574-8.
48. de Oliveira PT, Nanci A. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials 2004;25:403-13.
49. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999;20:1221-7.
50. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Design and evaluation of nanophase alumina for orthopedic/dental applications. Nanostruct Mater 1999;12:983-6.
51. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000;21:1803-10. (Pubitemid 30365044)
52. Karlsson M, Palsgard E, Wilshaw PR, Di Silvio L. Initial in vitro interaction of osteoblasts with nano-porous alumina. Biomaterials 2003;24:3039-46.
53. Price RL, Gutwein LG, Kaledin L, Frederick T, Webster TJ. Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: influence of chemistry, phase, and topography. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:1284-93.
54. Gutwein LG, Webster TJ. Increased viable osteoblast density in the presence of nanophase compared to conventional alumina and titania particles. Biomaterials 2004;25:4175-83.
55. Kay S, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. Tissue Eng 2002;8:753-61.
56. Price RL, Waid MC, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibers. Biomaterials 2003;24:1877-87.
57. Washburn NR, Yamada KM, Simon CG, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ. High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials 2004;25:1215-24.
58. Palin E, Liu H, Webster TJ. Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases boneforming cell adhesion and proliferation. Nanotechnology 2005;16:1828-35.
59. Webster TJ, Smith TA. Increased osteoblast function on PLGA composites containing nanophase titania. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;74:677-86.
60. Long M, Rack HJ. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement - a materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998;19:1621-39.
61. Guillemot F, Prima F, Bareille R, Gordin D, Gloriant T, Porte-Durrieu MC, et al. Design of new titanium alloys for orthopedic applications. Med Biol Eng Comput 2004;42:137-41.
62. Kokubo T, Kim HM, Kawashita M. Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties. Biomaterials 2003;24:2161-75.
63. 2. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78:595-604.
64. Webster TJ, Tong Z, Liu J, Banks MK. Adhesion of Pseudomonas fluorescens onto nanophase materials. Nanotechnology 2005;16: S449-57.
65. Mitik-Dineva N, Wang J, Mocanasu RC, Stoddart PR, Crawford RJ, Ivanova EP. Impact of nano-topography on bacterial attachment. Biotechnol J 2008;3:536-44.
66. Yao C, Perla V, McKenzie JL, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. Anodized Ti and Ti6Al4V possessing nanometer surface features enhances osteoblast adhesion. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2005;1:68-73.
67. Kawaguchi H, McKee MD, Okamoto H, Nanci A. Immunocytochemical and lectin - gold characterization of the interface between alveolar bone and implanted hydroxyapatite in the rat. Cell Mater 1993;3:337-50.
68. Buser D et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biochemical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.
69. Nishiguchi S, Nakamura T, Kobayashi M, Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T. The effect of heat treatment on bone bonding ability of alkali-treated titanium. Biomaterials 1999;20:491-500.
70. Wen HB, Liu Q, de Wijn JR, de Groot K, Cui FZ. Preparation of bioactive microporous titanium surface by a new two-step chemical treatment. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998;9:121-8.
71. Larsson C et al. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials 1996;17:605-16.
72. Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, Webster TJ. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials 2010;31(4):706-13.