Building artificially intelligent learning games

Games and Simulations in Online Learning: Research and Development Frameworks

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 271-307

  Van Eck, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898342114     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-304-3.ch014     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. Abdullah, M. H. (2001). Self-directed learning. ERIC Digest (ED459458). ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and Communications. Retrieved December 18, 2005, from http://ericdigests.org/2002-3/self.htm.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
3. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. B., & Reiser, B. J. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science, 228, 456-462.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
5. Bates, B. (2001). Story: Writing skills for game developers. Presentation at the Game Developers Conference, San Jose, CA, March 20-24. Retrieved October 5, fromhttp://www.gdconf.com/archives/2001/index.htm.
6. Bates, B. (2002). Game design: The art and business of creating games. Indianapolis, IN: Prima Tech.
7. Baylor, A. (2000). Beyond butlers: Intelligent agents as mentors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 373-382.
8. Baylor, A. (2001). Permutations of control: Cognitive consideration for agent-based learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(4), 403-425.
9. Baylor, A. L., & Kim, Y. (2005). Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(1), 95-115.
10. Baylor, A., & Ryu, J. (2003). Does the presence of image and animation enhance pedagogical agent persona? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(4), 373-395.
11. Begg, I., & White, P. (1985). Encoding specificity in interpersonal communication. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39(1), 70-87.
12. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2-sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
14. Bonar, J., & Cunningham, R. (1988). Bridge: An intelligent tutor for thinking about programming. In J. Self (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and human learning (pp. 391-409). London: Chapman and Hall Computing.
15. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129-148.
16. Bower, G. H. (1987). Commentary on mood and memory. Behavior Research Therapy, 25(6), 443-455.
17. Braben, D. (2002, March 21-23). Another five years from now: Future technologies. Presented at the Game Developers Conference, San Jose, CA. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://www.frontier.co.uk/press/articles/gdc2002-5yrsfromnow.ppt.
18. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. Bransford, J. D., Sherwook, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzere, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
20. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
21. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Choi, J. I. (1995). The effects of contextualization and complexity of situation on mathematics problem-solving and attitudes. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(10), 3884A. (UMI Microform No. 9605031).
23. Choi, J. I., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53-69.
24. Clark, M. S., Milberg, S., & Ross, J. (1983, December). Arousal cues arousal-related material in memory: Implications for understanding effects of mood on memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 633-649.
25. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 10(6), 2-10.
26. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited. Educational Technology, 33(3), 52-70.
27. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1996). Multimedia environments for enhancing learning in mathematics. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 285-305). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Cohen, R., & Siegel, A. W. (1991). A context for context: Toward an analysis of context and development. In R. Cohen & A. W. Siegel (Eds.), Context and development (pp. 3-23). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Collins, J. W., & O'Brien, N. P. (Eds). (2003). Greenwood dictionary of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
30. Corbett, A., Anderson, J., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., & VanLehn, K. (1999). Third generation computer tutors: Learn from or ignore human tutors? In Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of Computer-Human Interaction, (pp. 85-86). New York: Association of Computing Machinery.
31. Crawford, C. (1982). The art of computer game design. Out-of-print book. Retrieved December 20, 2005, from http://www.vancouver.wsu.edu/fac/peabody//game-book/Coverpage.html.
32. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimum experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
33. Decker, K. A., & Ware, H. W. (2001). Elementary teacher planning time: Teacher use; parent perception. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. April 10-14, 2001). Eric Document Reproduction Services (ED46324). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/0d/d4/aa.pdf.
34. Dillon, J. T. (1988). Questioning and teaching: A manual of practice. London: Croom Helm.
35. Duffrin, E. (no date). Direct instruction making waves. Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://www.catalyst-chicago.org/arch/09-96/096main.htm#Critique.
36. eSchool News. (2005). $10B gaming field inspires new curricula. September 30, 2005. Retrieved October 1, 2005, from http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryts.cfm?ArticleID=5896.
37. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
38. Foreman, J. (2004). Video game studies and the emerging instructional revolution. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 1(1), 1.
39. Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
40. Gery, G. (1991). Electronic performance support systems. Tolland, MA: Gery Associates.
41. Gee, J. P. (2003). Video games in the classroom? Colloquy live, The Chronicle of Higher Education, August 27, 2pm ET. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://chronicle.com/colloquylive/2003/08/video/.
42. Gee, J. P. (2004). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
43. Gertner, A., & VanLehn, K. (2000). Andes: A Coached problem solving environment for physics. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 5th International Conference (pp. 133-142). Berlin: Springer.
44. Gildea, P. M., Miller, G. A., & Wrutenberg, C. L. (1990). Contextual enrichment by videodisc. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 1-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Graesser, A. C., & Magliano, J. P. (1991). Context and cognition. In R. Cohen & A. W. Siegel (Eds.), Context and development (pp. 57-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Graesser, A. C., & McMahen, C. L. (1993). Anomalous information triggers questions when adults solve quantitative problems and comprehend stories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 136-151.
47. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137.
48. Graesser, A. C., Person, N., & Harter, D. (2000). Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(3), 257-279.
49. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-on-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9(4), 495-522.
50. Graesser, A. C., VanLehn, K., Rose, C., Jordan, P., & Harter, D. (2001). Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI Magazine, 22(4), 39-50.
51. Graesser, A. C., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Kreuz, R., & Tutoring Research Group. (1999). AutoTutor: A simulation of a human tutor. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1(1), 35-51.
52. Hartley, R., & Sleeman, D. H. (1973). Towards more intelligent teaching systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 5, 215-236.
53. Hu, X., Mathews, E., Graesser, A. C., & Susarla, S. (2002). EBOOK.EXE: A desktop authoring tool for HURAA. In M. Driscoll & T. C. Reeves (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2002 (pp. 471-476). Montreal, Canada: AACE Press.
54. Jenkins, H. (2004). Game design as narrative architecture. In N. Wardrip-Fruin & P. Harrigan (Eds.), First person: New media as story, performance, game (pp. 118-130). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
55. Johnson, S. (2005). Everything bad is good for you. New York: Pengu in Group.
56. Johnson, W. L. (2004). Motivational effects of socially intelligent pedagogical agents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
57. Jonassen, D. H. (2002). Integration of problem solving into instructional design. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design & technology (pp. 107-120). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
58. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
59. Larkin, J. H. (1989). What kind of knowledge transfers? In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 283-305). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Larochelle, M., & Bednarz, N. (1998). Constructivism and education: Beyond epistemological correctness. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and education (pp. 3-20). New York: Cambridge University.
61. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
62. Lepper, M. R., Aspinwall, L. G., Mumme, D. L., & Chabay, R. W. (1990). Self-perception and social-perception processes in tutoring: Subtle social control strategies of expert tutors. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Self-Inference Processes: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 6, pp. 217-237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Lepper, M. R., & Chabay, R. W. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and instruction: Conflicting views on the role of motivational processes in computer-based education. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 217-230.
64. Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A., & Bhoga, R. S. (1997). The Persona Effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. Association of Computing Machinery. Retrieved June 12, 2001, from http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/paper/j1.htm.
65. Macías, M., & Castells, P. (2001, December 18-20). Authoring tool for building adaptive learning guidance systems on the Web. In J. Liu, P. C. Yuen, C. H. Li, J. K.-Y. Ng, & T. Ishida (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Sixth International Computer Science Conference on Active Media Technology (AMT'01), Hong Kong (pp. 268-278). London: Springer-Verlag.
66. Merrill, D., Reiser, B., Ranney, M., & Trafton, J. (1992). Effective tutoring techniques: A comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(3), 277-305.
67. Miller, B. (1996). EPSS: Expanding the perspective. Retrieved February 19, 2003, from http://www.pcd-innovations.com/infosite/define.htm.
68. Moreno, R. (2004). Agent-based methods for multimedia learning environments: What works and why? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
69. Moreno, R., Mayer, R., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 177-213.
70. Murray, T. (1998). Authoring knowledge-based tutors: Tools for content, instructional strategy, student model, and interface design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(1), 5-64.
71. Murray, T., Blessing, S., & Ainsworth, S. (2003). Authoring tools for advanced technology learning environments. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
72. Otero, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition & Instruction 19(2), 143-17.
73. Papert, S. (1998, June). Does easy do it? Children, games, and learning. Game Developer, 87-88.
74. Pearce, C. (2004). Towards a game theory of game. In N. Wardrip-Fruin & P. Harrigan (Eds.), First person: New media as story, performance, game (pp 143-153). Cambridge: MIT.
75. Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5-12.
76. Prensky, M. (2000). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
77. Prensky, M. (2004, July 13). Future predictions: Trends in virtual education. What does the future hold? Department of Education Secretary's NCLB eLearning Summit: Increasing options through e-Learning, Orlando, FL. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://www.nclbtechsummits.org/summit2/presentations/5.3.Prensky.pdf.
78. Ravenscroft, A., & Matheson, M. P. (2002). Developing and evaluating dialogue games for collaborative e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 93-101.
79. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
80. Rickel, J., Marsella, S., Gratch, J., Hill, R., Traum, D., & Swartout, W. (2002). Toward a new generation of virtual humans for interactive experiences. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(4), 32-37.
81. Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 43-58. Retrieved from http://it.coe.uga.edu/~lrieber/play.html.
82. Schofield, J. W., & Evans-Rhodes, D. (1989). Artificial intelligence in the classroom. In D. Bierman, J. Greuker, & J. Sandberg (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and education: Synthesis and reflection (pp. 238-243). Springfield, VA: IOS.
83. Sengers, P. (1999). Narrative intelligence. In K. Dautenhahn (Ed.), Human cognition and social agent technology (pp. 1-26). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
84. Sengers, P. (2004). Schizophrenia and narrative in artificial agents. In N. Wardrip-Fruin & P. Harrigan (Eds.), First person: New media as story, performance, game (pp. 95-116). Cambridge: MIT.
85. Shute, V. (1985). Artificial intelligence. In T. Husen & T. Neville Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 333-340). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
86. Shute, V. J., & Psotka, J. (1996). Intelligent tutoring systems: Past, present and future. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 570-600). New York: Simon and Schuster.
87. Smith, L., & Mann, S. (2002, July). Playing the game: A model for gameness in interactive game based learning. In S. Mann (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual NACCQ, Hamilton, New Zealand. Dunedin, NZ: Wickliffe.
88. Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 342-353.
89. Stevens, A., & Collins, A. (1977). The goal structure of a Socratic tutor. In Proceedings of the National ACM Conference (pp. 256-263). New York: ACM.
90. Susarla, S. C., Adcock, A. B., Van Eck, R. N., & Moreno, K. N. (2003, November). Authoring for AutoTutor: Adding a new dimension to an intelligent tutoring system. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government & Higher Education 2003, Phoenix, AZ. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
91. Susarla, S., Adcock, A., Van Eck, R., Moreno, K., & Graesser, A. C. (2003). Development and evaluation of a lesson authoring tool for AutoTutor. In V. Aleven, U. Hoppe, J. Kay, R. Mizoguchi, H. Pain, F. Verdejo, et al. (Eds.), AIED2003 Supplemental Proceedings (pp. 378-387). Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney School of Information Technologies.
92. Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
93. Toole, J., & Heift, T. (2002). The tutor assistant: An authoring system for a Web-based intelligent language tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(4), 373-386.
94. VanLehn, K. (1996). Conceptual and metalearning during coached problem solving. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference (pp. 29-47). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
95. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
96. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
97. Zimmerman, E. (2004). Narrative, interactivity, play, and games: Four naughty concepts in need of discipline. In N. Wardrip-Fruin & P. Harrigan (Eds.), First person: New media as story, performance, game (pp. 154-164). Cambridge, MA: MIT.