Developing and evaluating dialogue games for collaborative e-learning

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 93-101

  Ravenscroft, A ^a   Matheson, M P ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Belief change; Collaboration; Dialogue; Empirical; Modelling; School; Science

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044530565     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00215.x     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Baker, M., Lund, K. & Baron, M. (1996) Modelling dialogue and beliefs as a basis for generating guidance in a CSCL environment. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) 1996, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086 (eds. G. Frasson, G. Gauthier & A. Lessgold) pp. 659-667. Springer Verlag, New York.
2. Burton, M., Brna, P. & Pilkington, R. (2000) Clarissa: a laboratory for the modelling of collaboration. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 79-105.
3. Clement, J. (1982) Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50, 1, 66-71.
4. Cook, J. (1998) Knowledge mentoring as a framework for designing computer-based agents supporting musical composition learning. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Computing Department, Open University.
5. Gunstone, R. & Watts, M. (1986) Force and motion. In Children's Ideas in Science, (eds. R. Driver, E. Guesne & A. Tiberghien) pp. 85-104. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
6. Hartley, J.R. (1998) Qualitative reasoning and conceptual change: computer based support in understanding science. Interactive Learning Environments, 5, 1 & 2, 53-64.
7. Hartley, J.R. & Ravenscroft, A. (1999) Supporting Exploratory and Expressive Learning: A Complimentary Approach. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 9. 3/4, 275-291.
8. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V. & Felton, M. (1997) Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 3, 287-315.
9. Levin, J.A. & Moore, J.A. (1977) Dialogue-Games: Metacommunication Structures for Natural Language Interaction. Cognitive Science, 1, 4, 395-420.
10. MacKenzie, J.D. (1979) Question-Begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 117-133.
11. Matheson, M. & Ravenscroft, A. (2001) Evaluating and Investigating Learning Through Collaborative Argumentation: an Empirical Study. Dialogue & Design Research Group Technical Report DDRG-01-01, The Open University, Milton Keynes.
12. Maudet, N. & Evrard, F. (1998) A generic framework for dialogue game implementation,. In Second Workshop on Formal Semantic and Pragmatics of Dialogue (TWLT13) (eds. J. Hulstijn & A. Nijholt) pp. 185-197. University of Twente.
13. McAlister, S. (2001) Argumentation and Design for Learning. Dialogue & Design Research Group Technical Report DDRG-01-02. The Open University, Milton Keynes.
14. Meyer, B.J.F. (1975) The Organisation of Prose and its Effect on Memory. North Holland, Amsterdam.
15. Moore, D.J. (1993) Dialogue Game Theory for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds, UK.
16. Moore, D.J. (2000) A Framework for using multimedia within argumentation systems. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 2, 83-98.
17. Moore, D.J. & Hobbs, D.J. (1996) Computational use of philosophical dialogue theories. Informal Logic, 18, 2, 131-163.
18. Pilkington, R.M. (1999) Analysing Educational Discourse: The DISCOUNT Scheme. Version. CBL Technical Report no. 99/2. The Open University, Milton Keyes.
19. Pilkington, R.M., Hartley, J.R., Hintze, D. & Moore, D. (1992) Learning to Argue and Arguing to Learn: An interface for computer-based dialogue games. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3, 3, 275-285.
20. Pilkington, R.M. & Parker-Jones, C. (1996) Interacting with Computer-Based Simulation. Computers and Education, 27, 1, 1-14.
21. Ravenscroft, A. (1997) Learning as Knowledge Refinement: A Computer Based Approach. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
22. Ravenscroft, A. (2000) Designing Argumentation for Conceptual Development. Computers and Education, 34, 241-255.
23. Ravenscroft, A. (2001) Designing e-learning interactions in 21C: Revisiting and re-thinking the role of theory. European Journal of Education, 36, 2, 133-156.
24. Ravenscroft, A. & Hartley, J.R. (1999) Learning as Knowledge Refinement: Designing a Dialectical Pedagogy for Conceptual Change. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. 50. (eds. S. Lajoie & M. Vivet) pp. 155-162. IOS Press, Amsterdam.
25. Ravenscroft, A. & Pilkington, R.M. (2000) Investigation by Design: Developing Dialogue Models to Support Reasoning and Conceptual Change. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education: 11. Part 1, 273-298.
26. Robertson, J., Good, J. & Pain, H. (1998) BetterBlether: The design and evaluation of a discussion tool for education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 219-236.
27. Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, M. (1992) Towards an analysis of discourse. In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis (ed. M. Coulthard) pp. 1-34. Routledge, London.
28. Stubbs, M. (1983) Discourse Analysis: the Sociolinguislic Analysis of Natural Language. Blackwell, Oxford.
29. Twigger, D., Byard, M., Draper, S., Driver, R., Hartley, J., Hennessey, S., Mallen, C., Mohamed, R., O'Malley, C., O'Shea, T. & Scanlon, E. (1991) The Conceptual Change in Science project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 144-155.
30. Vygotsky, L. (1962) Thought and Language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Vygotsky, L. (1974) Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Walton, D. (1984) Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies. (published Thesis), University Press America, Lanham.
33. Wegerif, R. (1996) Using computers to help coach exploratory talk across the curriculum. Computers and Education, 26, 1-3, 51-60.
34. Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. (translated by G.E.M. Anscombe) Blackwell, Oxford.