Parafoveal preview benefits during silent and oral reading: Testing the parafoveal information extraction hypothesis

Visual Cognition

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 354-376

  Inhoff, Albrecht W ^a   Radach, Ralph ^b  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Oral reading; Parafoveal preview benefit; Silent reading; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; GAZE; HUMAN; ORAL READING; PARAFOVEAL INFORMATION EXTRACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; RETINA FOVEA; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SILENT READING; VISUAL INFORMATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 84898039578     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.879630     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ashby, J., Yang, J., Evans, K. H. C., & Rayner, K. (2012). Eye movements and the perceptual span in silent and oral reading. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74, 634-640. 10.3758/s13414-012-0277-0
2. Baayen, H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes R package version 1.0-4 (Computer software). Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
5. Blanchard, H. E., McConkie, G. W., Zola, D. E., & Wolverton, G. S. (1984). Time course of visual information utilization during fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(1), 75-89. 10.1037/0096-1523.10.1.75
6. CELEX Database. (1995). Release D2.5 (Computer software). Nijmegen: Centre for Lexical Information.
7. Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1239-1249. 10.1080/17470210701467953
8. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777-813. 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
9. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429. 10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.417
10. Huestegge, L., Radach, R., Corbic, D., & Huestegge, S. M. (2009). Oculomotor and linguistic determinants of reading development: A longitudinal study. Vision Research, 49, 2948-2959. 10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.012
11. Hyönä, J., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 1430-1440.
12. Inhoff, A. W., Eiter, B. M., & Radach, R. (2005). The time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 979-995. 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.979
13. Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29-54). Oxford: Elsevier.
14. Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., & Eiter, B. (2006). Temporal overlap in the processing of successive words in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1490-1495. 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1490
15. Inhoff, A. W., Solomon, M., Radach, R., & Seymour, B. (2011). Temporal dynamics of the eye voice span and eye movement control during oral reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 543-558. 10.1080/20445911.2011.546782
16. Inhoff, A. W., & Wang, (1992). The encoding of text, manual movement planning, and eye-hand coordination during copytyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 437-448. 10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.437
17. Inhoff, A. W., & Weger, U. (2003). Advancing the methodological middle ground. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 335-344). Oxford: Elsevier.
18. Kennedy, A. (2008). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects are not an artifact of mislocated saccades. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 1-10.
19. McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 578-586. 10.3758/BF03203972
20. McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 221-224.
21. McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1987). Visual attention during eye fixations while reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 385-401). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for the future. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 3-26. 10.1080/09541440340000295
23. Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2013). Eye movements in reading: Some theoretical context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 429-452. 10.1080/17470218.2012.750676
24. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81. 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
25. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422. 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
26. Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506. 10.1080/17470210902816461
27. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213-234). Oxford: Elsevier.
28. R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
29. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125-157. 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
30. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4-22. 10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.002
31. Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34-55. 10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.006
32. Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 177-206. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001
33. Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2000). Saccadic inhibition and gaze contingent research paradigms. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 119-149). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
34. Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2003). Using the saccadic inhibition paradigm to investigate saccadic control in reading. In J. Hyona, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements (pp. 347-360). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
35. Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2004). Saccadic inhibition in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 194-211. 10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.194
36. Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2 in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 1026-1042. 10.1037/a0027735
37. Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (in press). Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of Word n + 1 during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
38. Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74, 5-35. 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
39. Sheridan, H., Rayner, K., & Reingold, E. M. (2013). Unsegmented text delays word identification: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Visual Cognition, 21, 38-60. 10.1080/13506285.2013.767296
40. Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2012). The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations. Memory and Cognition, 40, 1122-1131. 10.3758/s13421-012-0216-2
41. Slattery, T. J., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movements and display change detection during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1924-1938. 10.1037/a0024322
42. Wang, C.-A., & Inhoff, A. W. (2013). Extraction of linguistic information from successive words during reading: Evidence for spatially distributed lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 662-677. 10.1037/a0030242
43. Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
44. Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. W. (2004). Saccade generation during reading: Are words necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 226-261. 10.1080/09541440340000231