In ovo inoculation of chicken embryos with probiotic bacteria and its effect on posthatch Salmonella susceptibility

Poultry Science

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 818-829

  De Oliveira, J E ^a   Van Der Hoeven Hangoor, E ^b   Van De Linde, I B ^b   Montijn, R C ^c   Van Der Vossen, J M B M ^c  

^a Cargill R D Centre Europe   (Belgium)

^b Quality and Regulatory   (Netherlands)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bacteria colonization; In ovo; Probiotic; Salmonella Enteritidis

Indexed keywords

PROBIOTIC AGENT;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL SALMONELLOSIS; ARTICLE; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BACTERIA COLONIZATION; BIRD DISEASE; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKEN; DIET; DRUG EFFECT; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; IN OVO; INTESTINE; MICROBIOLOGY; OOCYTE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; VACCINATION;

BACTERIA COLONIZATION; IN OVO; PROBIOTIC; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS;

ANIMALS; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; DIET; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; INTESTINES; OVUM; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POULTRY DISEASES; PROBIOTICS; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL; VACCINATION;

EID: 84898034276     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2013-03409     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Amit-Romach, E., D. Sklan, and Z. Uni. 2004. Microflora ecology of the chicken intestine using 16S ribosomal DNA primers. Poult. Sci. 83:1093-1098.
2. Barrow, P. A., and J. F. Tucker. 1986. Inhibition os colonization of the chicken caecum with Salmonella Typhimurium by pre-treatment with strains of Escherichia coli. J. Hyg. Camb. 96:161-169.
3. Barug, D., M. W. A. Verstegen, J. D. Jong, and A. K. Kies. 2006. Antimicrobial growth promoters: Where do we go from here? Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
4. Bohorquez, D. 2010. Nutritional influences on the ultra-structural development of the small instestinal epithelium of the perinatal turkey embryo and poult. PhD Diss. North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
5. Buchanan, N. P., J. M. Hott, S. E. Cutlip, A. L. Rack, A. Asamer, and J. S. Moritz. 2008. The effects of a natural antibiotic alternative and a natural growth promoter feed additive on broiler performance and carcass quality. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 17:202-210.
6. Button, D. K., and B. R. Robertson. 2001. Determination of DNA content of aquatic bacteria by flow cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:1636-1645.
7. Casewell, M., C. Friis, E. Marco, P. McMullin, and I. Phillips. 2003. The European ban on growth-promoting antibiotics and emerging consequences for human and animal health. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:159-161.
8. Christensen, H., R. A. Olsen, and L. R. Bakken. 1995. Flow cytometric measurements of cell volumes and DNA contents during culture of indigenous soil bacteria. Microb. Ecol. 29:49-62.
9. Cochetiere, M. F. L., C. Rouge, D. Darmaun, J. C. Roze, G. Potel, and C. G. Leguen. 2007. Intestinal microbiota and preterm infants: A review. Curr. Pediatr. Rev. 3:21-34.
10. Cox, N. A., J. S. Bailey, L. C. Blankenship, and R. P. Gildersleeve. 1992. Research note: In ovo administration of a competitive exclusion culture treatment to broiler embryos. Poult. Sci. 71:1781-1784.
11. Craven, S. E. 1995. Salmonella Typhimurium, hydrophobic antibiotics, and the intestinal colonization of broiler chicks. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 4:333-340.
12. Cukrowska, B., R. Lodínová- Žádníková C. Enders, U. Sonnenborn, J. Schulze, and H. Tlaskalová-Hogenová 2002. Specific proliferative and antibody responses of premature infants to intestinal colonization with nonpathogenic probiotic E. coli strain Nissle 1917. Scand. J. Immunol. 55:204-209. http://dx.doi. org/10.1046/j.1365-3083.2002.01005.x.
13. CVB. 2006. Veevoedertabel (Livestock Feed Table). Central Bureau for Livestock Feeding, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
14. De Herdt, P., R. Ducatelle, E. Uyttebroek, J. Hermans, A. Sneep, and R. Torbeyns. 1999. Reovirus serology in broiler parents and their progeny and its correlation with performance. Avian Dis. 43:271-278.
15. Edens, F. W., C. R. Parkhurst, I. A. Casas, and W. J. Dobrogosz. 1997. Principles of ex ovo competitive exclusion and in ovo administration of Lactobacillus reuteri. Poult. Sci. 76:179-196.
16. Flint, J. F., and M. R. Garner. 2009. Feeding beneficial bacteria: A natural solution for increasing efficiency and decreasing pathogens in animal agriculture. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 18:367-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/japr. 2008-00133.
17. Foye, O. T., and B. L. Black. 2006. Intestinal adaptation to diet in the young domestic and wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 143:184-192.
18. Grönlund, M., O. Lehtonen, E. Eerola, and P. Kero. 1999. Fecal microflora in healthy infants born by different methods of delivery: Permanent changes in intestinal flora after cesarean delivery. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 28:19-25.
19. Hashemzadeh, Z., M. A. Karimi Torshizi, S. Rahimi, V. Razban, and T. Zahraei Salehi. 2010. Prevention of Salmonella colonization in neonatal broiler chicks by using different routes of probiotic administration in hatchery evaluated by culture and PCR techniques. J. Agric. Sci. Tech. 12:425-432.
20. Hill, D. 2001. Chick length uniformity profiles as a field measurements of chick quality? Avian Poult. Biol. Rev. 12:188.
21. Hosseini-Mansoub, N., T. Vahdatpour, M. Arjomandi, and S. Vahdatpour. 2011. Comparison of different methods of probiotic prescription against Salmonella infection in hatchery broiler chicken. Adv. Environ. Biol. 5:1857-1860.
22. Jain, S., H. Yadav, and P. R. Sinha. 2009. Probiotic Dahi containing Lactobacillus casei protects against Salmonella Enteritidis infection and modulates immune response in mice. J. Med. Food 12:576-583.
23. Kim, G.-B., Y. M. Seo, C. H. Kim, and I. K. Paik. 2011. Effect of dietary prebiotic supplementation on the performance, intestinal microflora, and immune response of broilers. Poult. Sci. 90:75-82.
24. Lodinová-Zádníková R., B. Cukrowska, and H. Tlaskalova-Hogenova. 2003. Oral administration of probiotic Escherichia coli after birth reduces frequency of allergies and repeated infections later in life (after 10 and 20 years). Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 131:209-211.
25. Lourens, A., R. Molenaar, H. van den Brand, M. Heetkamp, R. Meijerhof, and B. Kemp. 2006. Effect of egg size on heat production and the transition of energy from egg to hatchling. Poult. Sci. 85:770-776.
26. Lu, J., U. Idris, B. Harmon, C. Hofacre, J. J. Maurer, and M. D. Lee. 2003. Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:6816-6824.
27. MacKinnnon, K. M., H. He, C. L. Swaggerty, J. L. McReynolds, K. J. Genovese, S. E. Duke, J. R. Nerren, and M. H. Hogut. 2009. In ovo treatment with CpG oligoxynucleotides decreases colonization of Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 127:371-375.
28. Mateos, G. G., R. Lazaro, and M. I. Gracia. 2002. The feasibility of using nutritional modifications to replace drugs in poultry feeds. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 11:437-452.
29. Meijerhof, R. 2006. Chick size matters. World Poult. 22:30-31.
30. Meijerhof, R., and R. M. Hulet. 1997. In ovo injection of competitive exclusion culture in broiler hatching eggs. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 6:260-266.
31. Menconi, A., A. D. Wolfenden, S. Shivaramaiah, J. C. Terraes, T. Urbano, J. Kuttel, C. Kremer, B. M. Hargis, and G. Tellez. 2011. Effect of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture for the treatment of Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg in neonatal broiler chickens and turkey poults. Poult. Sci. 90:561-565.
32. Mills, T. K., M. P. Lombardo, and P. A. Thorpe. 1999. Microbial colonization of the cloacae of nestling tree swallows. Auk 116:947-956.
33. Molenaar, R., I. A. Reijrink, R. Meijerhof, and H. van den Brand. 2008. Relationship between hatching length and weight on lat-er productive performance in broilers. World's Poult. Sci. J. 64:599-603.
34. Nadkarni, M. A., F. E. Martin, N. A. Jacques, and N. Hunter. 2002. Determinqtion of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology 148:257-266.
35. Nisbet, D. J., S. C. Ricke, C. M. Scanlan, D. E. Corrier, A. G. Holllster, and J. R. Deloach. 1994. Inoculation of broiler chicks with a continuous-flow derived bacterial culture facilitates early cecal bacterial colonization and increases resistance to Salmonella Typhimurium. J. Food Prot. 57:12-15.
36. Nurmi, E., and M. Rantala. 1973. New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature 241:210-211.
37. Pedroso, A. 2009. Which came first: The egg or its microbiota? Pages 1-4 in Poultry Informed Professional. University of Georgia, Athens.
38. Penders, J., C. Thijs, C. Vink, F. F. Stelma, B. Snijders, I. Kummeling, P. A. van den Brandt, and E. E. Stobberingh. 2006. Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy. Pediatrics 118:511-521.
39. Rao, S., R. Srinivasjois, and S. Patole. 2009. Prebiotic supplementation in full-term neonates: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 163:755-764.
40. SAS Institute Inc. 2008. JMP User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
41. Schneitz, C., L. Nuotio, G. Mead, and E. Nurmi. 1992. Competitive exclusion in the young bird: Challenge models, administration and reciprocal protection. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 15:241-244.
42. Schultz, M., C. Göttl,, R. J. Young, P. Iwen, and J. A. Vanderhoof. 2004. Administration of oral probiotic bacteria to pregnant women causes temporary infantile colonization. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 38:293-297.
43. Senok, A. C., A. Y. Ismaeel, and G. A. Botta. 2005. Probiotics: Facts and myths. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11:958-966.
44. Smirnov, A., E. Tako, P. R. Ferket, and Z. Uni. 2006. Mucin gene expression and mucin content in the chicken intestinal goblet cells are affected by in ovo feeding of carbohydrates. Poult. Sci. 85:669-673.
45. Stern, N. J. 2008. Salmonella species and Campylobacter jejuni cecal colonization model in broilers. Poult. Sci. 87:2399-2403.
46. Sterzo, E., J. Paiva, R. Penha Filho, and A. Berchieri Junior. 2005. Time required to protect the intestinal tract of chicks against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis using competitive exclusion. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 7:119-122.
47. Taghavi, A., B. Allan, G. Mutwiri, A. van Kessel, P. Willson, L. Babiuk, A. Potter, and S. Gomis. 2008. Protection of neonatal broiler chicks against Salmonella Typhimurium septicemia by DNA containing CpG motifs. Avian Dis. 52:398-406.
48. Tako, E., P. R. Ferket, and Z. Uni. 2004. Effects of in ovo feeding of carbohydrates and beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate on the development of chicken intestine. Poult. Sci. 83:2023-2028.
49. Uni, Z., P. R. Ferket, E. Tako, and O. Kedar. 2005. In ovo feeding improves energy status of late-term chicken embryos. Poult. Sci. 84:764-770.
50. van der Hoeven-Hangoor, E., J. M. B. M. van der Vossen, F. H. J. Schuren, M. W. A. Verstegen, J. E. de Oliveira, R. C. Montijn, and W. H. Hendriks. 2013. Ileal microbial composition of broilers fed various commercial diet compositions. Poult. Sci. 92:2713-2723.
51. Vandeplas, S., R. Dubois Dauphin, Y. Beckers, P. Thonart, and A. Thewis. 2010. Salmonella in chicken: Current and developing strategies to reduce contamination at farm level. J. Food Prot. 73:774-785.
52. Willemsen, H., N. Everaert, L. de Smith, M. Debonne, F. Verschuere, O. Garain, D. Berckmans, E. Decuypere, and V. Bruggeman. 2008. Critical assessment of chick quality measurements as an indicator of posthatch performance. Poult. Sci. 87:2358-2366.
53. Yalcin, S., S. Ozkan, M. Cabuk, and P. B. Siegel. 2003. Criteria for evaluating husbandry practices to alleviate heat stress in broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 12:382-388.
54. Yamawaki, R. A., E. L. Milbradt, M. P. Coppola, J. C. Z. Rodrigues, R. L. Andreatti Filho, C. R. Padovani, and A. S. Okamoto. 2013. Effect of immersion and enoculation in ovo of Lactobacillus spp. in embryonated chicken eggs in the prevention of Salmonella Enteritidis after hatch. Poult. Sci. 92:1560-1563.