Supraglottic airway devices versus tracheal intubation for airway management during general anaesthesia in obese patients

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 9, 2013, Pages

  Nicholson, Amanda ^a   Cook, Tim M ^b   Smith, Andrew F ^c   Lewis, Sharon R ^c   Reed, Stephanie S ^c  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL UNITED HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL LANCASTER INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; BLOOD OXYGEN TENSION; BRONCHOCONSTRICTION; COUGHING; DEVICE SAFETY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; HYPOXEMIA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LARYNX SPASM; OBESITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATION CONTROL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; COMPLICATION; DEVICES; LAPAROSCOPY; LARYNGEAL MASK; META ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); EQUIPMENT; METHODOLOGY;

AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LAPAROSCOPY; LARYNGEAL MASKS; OBESITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84898021421     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010105.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Carron M, Veronese S, Gomiero W, Foletto M, Nitti D, Ori C, et al. Hemodynamic and hormonal stress responses to endotracheal tube and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway for laparoscopic gastric banding. Anesthesiology. 2012/05/23 2012; Vol. 117, issue 2:309-20. [ISRCTN18342801]
2. Zoremba M, Aust H, Eberhart L, Braunecker S, Wulf H. Comparison between intubation and the laryngeal mask airway in moderately obese adults. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2009; Vol. 53, issue 4:436-42. [19226293]
3. Abdi W, Amathieu R, Adhoum A, Poncelet C, Slavov V, Kamoun W, et al. Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme (TM) and the ETT. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2010; Vol. 54, issue 2:141-6. [WOS:000273448700004]
4. Arslan ZI, Ozdamar D, Yildiz TS, Solak ZM, Toker K. Tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients: a comparison of the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway and Laryngeal Mask Airway CTrach. Anaesthesia 2012;67(3):261-5. [PUBMED: 22321082]
5. Borkowski A, Perl T, Heuer J, Timmermann A, Braun U. The applicability of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for laparotomies. Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie 2005; Vol. 40, issue 8:477-86. [WOS:000231183300005]
6. Dhonneur G, Ndoko SK, Yavchitz A, Foucrier A, Fessenmeyer C, Pollian C, et al. Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: LMA CTrach vs direct laryngoscopy. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006;97(5):742-5. [PUBMED: 16997840]
7. Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, Eschertzhuber S, Ulmer H, Keller C. A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2007/08/19 2007; Vol. 62, issue 9:913-8. [NCT00402870]
8. Khazin V, Ezri T, Yishai R, Sessler DI, Serour F, Szmuk P, et al. Gastroesophageal regurgitation during anesthesia and controlled ventilation with six airway devices. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2008; Vol. 20, issue 7:508-13. [WOS:000261708800005]
9. Larsson A. LMA: a big choice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009/03/26 2009; Vol. 53, issue 4:421-2. [19317859]
10. Li RP, Xue FS, Cheng Y, Liao X. Comparative performance of GlideScope((R)) videolaryngoscope and Fastrach intubation laryngeal mask airway in the morbidly obese patients. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2013; Vol. 57, issue 2:262-3. [PUBMED: 22998074]
11. Lim Y, Goel S, Brimacombe JR. The ProSeal (TM) laryngeal mask airway is an effective alternative to laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2007; Vol. 35, issue 1:52-6. [WOS:000245610100009]
12. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert D, Fick GH. The LMA-ProSeal is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2002; Vol. 49, issue 8:857-62. [12374716]
13. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Fick GH. LMA-Classic and LMA-ProSeal are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2003; Vol. 50, issue 1:71-7. [12514155]
14. Mann V, Mann STW, Rupp D, Rohrig R, Weigand MA, Muller M. Influence of head position and neuromuscular block on the clinical efficacy of supraglottic airway devices. A prospective randomized study to compare the laryngeal tube suction (LT(TM)) with the ProSeal((TM)) laryngeal mask. Notfall and Rettungsmedizin 2012; Vol. 15, issue 2:136-41. [WOS:000304153300007]
15. Miller DM, Camporota L. Advantages of ProSeal (TM) and SLIPA (TM) airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie 2006; Vol. 53, issue 2:188-93. [WOS:000234952200014]
16. Olsen KS. Laryngeal mask or endotracheal tube for back surgery in the prone position. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01041352. 2012.
17. Uppal V, Fletcher G, Kinsella J. Comparison of the i-gel with the cuffed tracheal tube during pressure-controlled ventilation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009; Vol. 102, issue 2:264-8. [WOS:000262518400018]
18. Weber U, Oguz R, Potura LA, Kimberger O, Kober A, Tschernko E. Comparison of the i-gel and the LMA-Unique laryngeal mask airway in patients with mild to moderate obesity during elective short-term surgery. Anaesthesia 2011; Vol. 66, issue 6:481-7. [21568982]
19. Ydemann M, Rovsing L, Lindekaer AL, Olsen KS. Intubation of the morbidly obese patient: GlideScope((R)) vs. Fastrach. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2012;56(6):755-61. [PUBMED: 22524487]
20. Adams JP, Murphy PG. Obesity in anaesthesia and intensive care. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000;85(1):91-108. [PUBMED: 10927998]
21. Bernardini A, Natalini G. Risk of pulmonary aspiration with laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube: analysis on 65 712 procedures with positive pressure ventilation. Anaesthesia 2009;64(12):1289-94. [PUBMED: 19860753]
22. Brain AI, McGhee TD, McAteer EJ, Thomas A, Abu-Saad MA, Bushman JA. The laryngeal mask airway. Development and preliminary trials of a new type of airway. Anaesthesia. 1985/04/01 1985; Vol. 40, issue 4:356-61. [PUBMED: 4003736]
23. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal'-a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2000/06/09 2000; Vol. 84, issue 5:650-4. [PUBMED: 10844848]
24. Brimacombe J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis (Structured abstract). Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 1995; Vol. 42, issue 11:1017-23. [CENTRAL: DARE-11995003157]
25. Brimacombe JR, Berry A. The incidence of aspiration associated with the laryngeal mask airway: a meta-analysis of published literature. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 1995; Vol. 7, issue 4:297-305. [PUBMED: 7546756]
26. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2005/08/17 2005; Vol. 52, issue 7:739-60. [PUBMED: 16103390]
27. Cook TM, Gibbison B. Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway by one anaesthetist at a district general hospital. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007;99(3):436-9. [PUBMED: 17604305]
28. Cook TM, Howes B. Supraglottic airway devices: recent advances. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain 2011; Vol. 11, issue 2:56-61.
29. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011/03/31 2011; Vol. 106, issue 5:617-31. [PUBMED: 21447488]
30. Frappier J, Guenoun T, Journois D, Philippe H, Aka E, Cadi P, et al. Airway management using the intubating laryngeal mask airway for the morbidly obese patient. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2003/04/23 2003; Vol. 96, issue 5:1510-5, table of contents. [12707159]
31. Goldmann K, Gerlach M, Borntrager C. [ProSealTM laryngeal mask in normal weight and obese patients: oxygenation under pressure-controlled ventilation and different end-expiratory pressures]. Anaesthesist 2011; Vol. 60, issue 10:908-15. [21796447]
32. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?. BMJ. 2008/05/06 2008; Vol. 336, issue 7651:995-8. [PUBMED: 18456631]
33. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org.
34. Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, von Goedecke A, Keller C. Postoperative nausea, vomiting, airway morbidity, and analgesic requirements are lower for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway than the tracheal tube in females undergoing breast and gynaecological surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2007/07/10 2007; Vol. 99, issue 4:576-80. [17617554]
35. Juvin P, Lavaut E, Dupont H, Lefevre P, Demetriou M, Dumoulin JL, et al. Difficult tracheal intubation is more common in obese than in lean patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2003/07/23 2003; Vol. 97, issue 2:595-600, table of contents. [PUBMED: 12873960]
36. Karkouti K, Rose DK, Wigglesworth D, Cohen MM. Predicting difficult intubation: a multivariable analysis. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2000/08/25 2000; Vol. 47, issue 8:730-9. [PUBMED: 10958088]
37. Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. International Journal of Obesity (2005) 2008;32(9):1431-7. [PUBMED: 18607383]
38. Kristensen MS. Airway management and morbid obesity. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2010/08/07 2010; Vol. 27, issue 11:923-7. [20689440]
39. Lundstrom LH, Moller AM, Rosenstock C, Astrup G, Wetterslev J. High body mass index is a weak predictor for difficult and failed tracheal intubation: a cohort study of 91, 332 consecutive patients scheduled for direct laryngoscopy registered in the Danish Anesthesia Database. Anesthesiology. 2009/02/06 2009; Vol. 110, issue 2:266-74. [PUBMED: 19194154]
40. Malhotra A, Hillman D. Obesity and the lung: 3. Obesity, respiration and intensive care. Thorax 2008;63(10):925-31. [PUBMED: 18820119]
41. Marley RA, Hoyle B, Ries C. Perianesthesia respiratory care of the bariatric patient. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing 2005;20(6):404-31; quiz 432-4. [PUBMED: 16387272]
42. Natalini G, Franceschetti ME, Pletti C, Recupero D, Lanza G, Bernardini A. Impact of laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube on pulmonary function during the early postoperative period. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2002;46(5):525-8. [PUBMED: 12027846]
43. Natalini G, Franceschetti ME, Pantelidi MT, Rosano A, Lanza G, Bernardini A. Comparison of the standard laryngeal mask airway and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in obese patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2003; Vol. 90, issue 3:323-6. [12594145]
44. Obesity and the economics of prevention: Fit not fat. http://www.oecd.org/health/healthpoliciesanddata/obesityandtheeconomicsofpreventionfitnotfat.htm (accessed 9 October 2012).
45. OECD. Obesity update. http://www.oecd.org/health/49716427.pdf (accessed 22 May 2013).
46. Piper SN, Triem JG, Rohm KD, Maleck WH, Schollhorn TAH, Boldt J. ProSeal (TM) laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy (Retracted article. See vol. 46, pg. 490, 2011). Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie 2004; Vol. 39, issue 3:132-7. [WOS:000220327200003]
47. Qamarul Hoda M, Samad K, Ullah H. ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adult patients undergoing elective surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009026]
48. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
49. Tanaka A, Isono S, Ishikawa T, Sato J, Nishino T. Laryngeal resistance before and after minor surgery: endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 2003;99(2):252-8. [PUBMED: 12883396]
50. Verghese C, Brimacombe JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11, 910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1996; Vol. 82, issue 1:129-33. [PUBMED: 8712387]
51. Voyagis GS, Photakis D, Kellari A, Kostanti E, Kaklis S, Secha-Dousaitou PN, et al. The laryngeal mask airway: a survey of its usage in 1, 096 patients. Minerva Anestesiologica 1996;62(9):277-80. [PUBMED: 9038036]
52. World Health Organisation. 10 facts on obesity. http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/obesity/facts/en/index1.html. Accessed on 2 September 2013.
53. Woodall NM, Cook TM. National census of airway management techniques used for anaesthesia in the UK: first phase of the Fourth National Audit Project at the Royal College of Anaesthetists. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2011; Vol. 106, issue 2:266-71.
54. Yu SH, Beirne OR. Laryngeal mask airways have a lower risk of airway complications compared with endotracheal intubation: a systematic review (Structured abstract). Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2010; Vol. 68, issue 10:2359-76. [CENTRAL: DARE-12010007389]
55. Zhang YJ, Liu XZ, Liu B. Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tubes for intraoperative airway management during laparoscopic biliary tract surgery: a systematic review (Provisional abstract). Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 2009; Vol. 9, issue 5:552-7. [CENTRAL: DARE-12009105697]
56. Nicholson A, Cook TM, Lewis SR, Reed SS, Smith AF. Supraglottic airway devices versus tracheal intubation for airway management during general anaesthesia in obese patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010105]