ProSeal™-Laryngeal Mask Versus Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Gynaecologic Laparoscopy;Ein Vergleich der ProSeal®-Larynxmaske mit der Konventionellen Endotrachealen Intubation bei Laparoskopien in der Gynäkologie

Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 132-137

  Piper, Swen N ^a   Triem, J G ^a   Rohm K D ^a   Maleck, W H ^b   Schollhorn T A H ^a   Boldt, J ^a  

^a KLINIKUM LUDWIGSHAFEN   (Germany)

^b Spital Grenchen   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Endotracheal intubation; Gastric tube; Laparoscopy; Laryngeal mask airway; ProSeal LMA

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT; MIDAZOLAM;

ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PATIENT MONITORING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SORE THROAT; STOMACH TUBE; ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COUGHING; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PHARYNGITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, INTRAVENOUS; BLOOD PRESSURE; COUGH; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LAPAROSCOPY; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MIDDLE AGED; PHARYNGITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 1642372895     PISSN: 09392661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-814331     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA "ProSeal" - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 64: 650-654
2. Braun U, Zerbst M, Füllekrug B, Gentzel I, Hempel V, Leier M, Peters T, Hobbensiefken G, Klein U, Heuser D, Weyland A, Rey D, Weirich C, Krier C. Ein Vergleich der Larynxmaske (LMA) vom Typ "ProSeal" gegen die Standard-LMA bei anästhesierten, nicht relaxierten Patienten. Ergebnisse einer deutschen Multicenterstudie. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2002; 37: 727-733
3. Füllekrug B, Reissmann H, Pothmann W, Masch T, Schulte am Esch J. Die ProSeal-LM, eine neue Variante der Larynxmaske: Beschreibung und erste klinische Erfahrungen. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2001; 36: 213-218
4. Joshi GP, Inagaki Y, White PF, Taylor-Kennedy L, Wat LI, Gevirtz C, McCraney JM, McCulloch DA. Use of the laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to the tracheal tube during ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 573-577
5. Todd DW. A comparison of endotracheal intubation and use of the laryngeal mask airway for ambulatory oral surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60: 2-4
6. Van Damme E. Die Kehlkopfmaske in der ambulanten Anästhesie. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1994; 29: 284-286
7. Langer S, Hempel V, Ahlhelm T, Heipertz W. Die Kehlkopfmaske bei > 1900 Anästhesien - Erfahrungsbericht. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1993; 28: 156-160
8. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Wraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985; 32: 429-434
9. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postoperative recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970; 49: 924-933
10. Raatz U. Die Modifikation des White-Tests bei großen Stichproben. Biometrische Zeitschrift 1966; 8: 42-54
11. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Fick GH. LMA-Classic™ and LMA-ProSeal™ are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynaecologic laparoscopy. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 71-77
12. Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Shyr M. ProSeal versus the classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 824-827
13. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Fick GH. Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anesth 2000; 47: 622-626
14. Cunningham AJ, Brull SJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: anesthetic implications. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 1120-1133
15. Larsen R. Endotracheale Intubation und Larynxmaske. In: Anästhesie 6. Auflage. München, Wien Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg Verlag, 1999: 445-495
16. Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MFM. ProSeal laryngeal mask protects against aspiration of fluid in the pharynx. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 584-587
17. Mark DA. Protection from aspiration with the LMA-ProSeal™ after vomiting: a case report. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 78-80
18. Evans NR, Llewellyn RL, Gardner SV, James MFM. Aspiration prevented by the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: a case report. Can J Anesth 2002; 49: 413-416
19. Krier C, Georgi R. Atemwegssicherung - gibt es mehr als einen "Goldstandard"? Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2001; 36: 193-194
20. Koay CK. A case of aspiration using the Proseal LMA. Anaesth Intensive Care 2003; 31: 123
21. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Aspiration of gastric contents during use of a ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway secondary to unidentified foldovermalposition. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1192-1194
22. Holden R, Morsman CD, Butler J, Clark GS, Hughes DS, Bacon PJ. Intraocular pressure changes using the laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 922-924
23. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Fick GH. The LMA-Pro-Seal™ is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anesth 2002; 49: 857-862
24. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Lees M, Millar JM, Baskett PJF. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 527-533
25. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Füllekrug B, Agrò F, Rosenblatt W, Dierdorf SF, Garcia deLucas E, Capdevilla X, Brimacombe N. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal™ and Classic™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalysed patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 289-295