A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA® laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery

Anaesthesia

Volumn 62, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 913-918

  Hohlrieder, M ^a   Brimacombe, J ^b   Eschertzhuber, S ^a   Ulmer, H ^a   Keller, C ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEXAMETHASONE; DICLOFENAC; FENTANYL; MORPHINE; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; ROCURONIUM; TROPISETRON;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DYSPHAGIA; DYSPHONIA; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MUSCLE RELAXATION; NAUSEA; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SORE THROAT; STOMACH TUBE; VOMITING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LAPAROSCOPY; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MIDDLE AGED; MORPHINE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 34547909221     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05142.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Kelly DJ, Ahmad M, Brull SJ. Preemptive analgesia I: Physiological pathways and pharmacological modalities. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2001; 48: 1000-10.
2. Wang JJ, Ho ST, Liu HS, Tzeng JI, Tze TS, Liaw WJ. The effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. regional Anesthesia 1996; 21: 281-6.
3. Brimacombe J. Pathophysiology. In: Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia. Principles and Practice. London: W.B. Saunders, 2005: 105-37.
4. Cork RC, Depa RM, Standen JR. Prospective comparison of use of the laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube for ambulatory surgery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1994; 79: 719-27.
5. Buniatian AA, Dolbneva EL. [Laryngeal mask under total myoplegia and artificial pulmonary ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomies]. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii meditsinskikh nauk 1997; 9: 33-8.
6. Holrieder M, Brimacombe J, von Goedecke A, Keller C. Postoperative nausea, vomiting, airway morbidity and analgesic requirements are lower for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway than the tracheal tube in females undergoing breast and gynaecological surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007; in press.
7. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 104-9.
8. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal with the Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 289-95.
9. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Vosoba Judd D. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal TM laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 25-9.
10. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kurian S, Myles J. Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002; 88: 127-9.
11. Gaddis GM, Gaddis ML. Introduction to biostatistics: Part 5, Statistical inference techniques for hypothesis testing with nonparametric data. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1990; 19: 1054-9.