Methodology for establishing a population-based birth cohort focusing on couple fertility and children's development, the upstate KIDS study

Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 191-202

  Louis, Germaine M Buck ^a   Hediger, Mary L ^a   Bell, Erin M ^b   Kus, Christopher A ^c   Sundaram, Rajeshwari ^a   McLain, Alexander C ^d   Yeung, Edwina ^a   Hills, Elaine A ^b,c   Thoma, Marie E ^a   Druschel, Charlotte M ^b,c  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

assisted reproductive technologies; children; fecundity; in vitro fertilization; infertility

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; CLOMIFENE CITRATE; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; LEUPRORELIN; MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; METFORMIN; RECOMBINANT CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSISTED HATCHING; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; BIRTH; BIRTH CERTIFICATE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUPLE FERTILITY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FAMILY ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILITY; FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER; GAMETE INTRAFALLOPIAN TRANSFER; GESTATIONAL AGE; HORMONAL THERAPY; HUMAN; INFANT; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MOTHER; POPULATION; PUERPERIUM; REGISTER; REPRODUCTIVE HISTORY; SELF REPORT; TWINS; BIRTH RATE; CHILD; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FAMILY SIZE; HEALTH SURVEY; MALE; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRESCHOOL CHILD; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; BIRTH CERTIFICATES; BIRTH RATE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MULTIPLE BIRTH OFFSPRING; NEW YORK; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; TWINS;

EID: 84897985572     PISSN: 02695022     EISSN: 13653016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12121     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bower C, Hansen M,. Assisted reproductive technologies and birth outcomes: overview of recent systematic reviews. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 2005; 17: 329-333.
2. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS,. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 103: 551-563.
3. Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS,. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. New England Journal of Medicine 2002; 346: 731-737.
4. Schieve LA, Cohen B, Nannini A, Ferre C, Reynolds MA, Zhang Z, et al. A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2007; 11: 517-525.
5. Hansen M, Colvin L, Petterson B, Kurinczuk JJ, de Klerk N, Bower C,. Twins born following assisted reproductive technology: perinatal outcome and admission to hospital. Human Reproduction 2009; 24: 2321-2331.
6. McDonald S, Murphy K, Beyene J, Ohlsson A,. Perinatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 193: 141-152.
7. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C,. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update 2013; 19: 330-353.
8. Kalra SK, Barnhart KT,. In vitro fertilization and adverse childhood outcomes: what we know, where we are going, and how we will get there. A glimpse into what lies behind and beckons ahead. Fertility and Sterility 2011; 95: 1887-1889.
9. Hart R, Norman RJ,. The long-term health outcomes for children born as a result of IVF treatment: part 1-General health outcomes. Human Reproduction Update 2013; 19: 232-243.
10. Hart R, Norman RJ,. The longer-term health outcomes for children born as a result of IVF treatment. Part II: mental health and developmental outcomes. Human Reproduction Update 2013; 19: 244-250.
11. Hediger ML, Bell EA, Druschel CM, Buck Louis GM,. Assisted reproductive technologies and children's neurodevelopmental status. Fertility and Sterility 2013; 99: 311-317.
12. Hvidtjorn D, Schieve L, Schendel D, Jacobsson B, Svaerke C, Thorsen P,. Cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorders, and developmental delay in children born after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2009; 163: 72-83.
13. Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Flowers L, Anderson JE, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance-United States. MMWR. Surveillance Summaries: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2012; 61: 1-23.
14. Hammoud AO, Gibson M, Stanford J, White G, Carrell DT, Peterson CM,. In vitro fertilization availability and utilization in the United States: a study of demographic, social and economic factors. Fertility and Sterility 2009; 91: 1630-1635.
15. Buck Louis GM,. Fecundity and fertility. In: Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology. Editors:, Buck Louis GM, Platt RW,. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011; pp. 16-61.
16. Axmon A, Hagmar L,. Time to pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. Fertility and Sterility 2005; 84: 966-974.
17. Williams MA, Goldman MB, Mittendorf R, Monson RR,. Subfertility and the risk of low birth weight. Fertility and Sterility 1991; 56: 668-671.
18. Källén B, Olausson PO, Nygren KG,. Neonatal outcome in pregnancies from ovarian stimulation. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002; 100: 414-419.
19. Cooney MA, Buck Louis GM, Sundaram R, McGuiness BM, Lynch CD,. Validity of self-reported time to pregnancy. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) 2009; 26: 56-59.
20. Kapiteijn K, de Bruijn CS, de Boer E, de Craen AJ, Burger CW, van Leeuuen FE, et al. Does subfertility explain the risk of poor perinatal outcome after IVF and ovarian hyperstimulation? Human Reproduction 2006; 21: 3228-3234.
21. Buck GM, Schisterman EF, Dukic VM, Schieve LA,. Research hurdles complicating the analysis of infertility treatment on child health. Human Reproduction 2005; 20: 12-18.
22. Barnhart KT,. Assisted reproductive technologies and perinatal morbidity: interrogating the association. Fertility and Sterility 2013; 99: 299-302.
23. American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Children with Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee, and Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 405-420.
24. American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Children with Disabilities. Role of the medical home in family-centered early intervention services. Pediatrics 2007; 120: 1153-1158.
25. Roohan PJ, Josberger RE, Acar J, Dabir P, Feder HM, Gagliano PJ,. Validation of birth certificate data in New York State. Journal of Community Health 2003; 28: 335-346.
26. Squires J, Bricker D, Potter L,. Revision of a parent-completed developmental screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 1997; 22: 313-328.
27. Squires J, Potter L, Bricker D,. The ASQ User's Guide, 2nd edn. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., 1999.
28. Squires J, Bricker D,. Ages and Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ-3™). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., 2009.
29. Robbins DL, Dumont-Mathieu TM,. Early screening for autism spectrum disorders: update on the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers and other measures. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 2006; 27: 111-119.
30. Gollenberg AL, Lynch CD, Jackson LW, McGuinness BM, Msall ME,. Concurrent validity of the parent-completed Ages and Stages Questionnaires, 2nd Ed. with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II in a low risk sample. Child: Care, Health and Development 2010; 36: 485-490.
31. Pepe MS,. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford Statistical Science Series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
32. Schieve LA, Rosenberg D, Handler A, Rankin K, Reynolds MA,. Validity of self-reported use of assisted reproductive technology treatment among women participating in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in five states, 2000. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2006; 10: 427-431.
33. Northam S, Knapp TR,. The reliability and validity of birth certificates. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 2006; 35: 3-12.
34. Zhang Z, Macaluso M, Cohen B, Schieve L, Nannini A, Chen M, et al. Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on the Massachusetts birth certificate, 1997-2000. Fertility and Sterility 2010; 94: 1657-1661.
35. Lynch CD, Buck Louis GM, Lahti MC, Pekow PS, Nasca PC, Cohen B,. The birth certificate as an efficient means of identifying children conceived with the help of infertility treatment. American Journal of Epidemiology 2011; 174: 211-218.
36. Martin JA, Wilson EC, Osterman MJK, Saadi EW, Sutton SR, Hamilton BE,. Assessing the Quality of Medical and Health Data from the 2003 Birth Certificate Revision: Results from Two States, Vol. 62, no. 2, National Vital Statistics Reports. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2013.
37. Vinikoor LC, Messer LC, Laraia BA, Kaufman JS,. Reliability of variables on the North Carolina birth certificate: a comparison with directly queried values from a cohort study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2010; 24: 102-112.
38. Stephan EH, Chandra A,. Declining estimates of infertility in the United States: 1982-2002. Fertility and Sterility 2006; 86: 516-523.
39. Thoma ME, McLain AC, Louis JF, King RB, Trumble AC, Sundaram R,. The prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach. Fertility and Sterility 2013; 99: 1324-1331.
40. Schieve LA, Devine O, Boyle CA, Petrini JR, Warner L,. Estimation of the contribution of non-assisted reproductive technology ovulation stimulation fertility treatments to US singleton and multiple births. American Journal of Epidemiology 2009; 170: 1396-1407.
41. Simonsen SE, Baksh L, Stanford JB,. Infertility treatment in a population-based sample: 2004-2005. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2012; 16: 877-886.
42. Nohr EA, Frydenberg M, Henriksen TB, Olsen J,. Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias? Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) 2006; 17: 413-418.
43. Moreau C, Bouyer J, Ducot B, Spira A, Slama R,. When do involuntary infertile couples choose to seek medical help? Fertility and Sterility 2010; 93: 737-744.
44. Andrade SE, Scott PE, Davis RL, Li DK, Getahun D, Cheetham TC, et al. Validity of health plan and birth certificate data for pregnancy research. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 2013; 22: 7-15. Development Development