In vitro fertilization and adverse childhood outcomes: What we know, where we are going, and how we will get there. A glimpse into what lies behind and beckons ahead

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1887-1889

  Kalra, Suleena Kansal ^a   Barnhart, Kurt T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; PERINATAL MORBIDITY; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT;

EID: 79955049779     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.044     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Centers for Disease Control. Assisted Reproductive Technology Report. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ART/. Accessed January 21, 2011.
2. Centers for Disease Control. Assisted Reproductive Technology Report. Available at: http://cdc.gov/art/ART2007/sect2-fig5-15.htm#10/. Accessed January 21, 2011.
3. M.A. Reynolds, L.A. Schieve, J.A. Martin, G. Jeng, and M. Macalluso Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997-2000 Pediatrics 111 2003 1159 1162 (Pubitemid 36539221)
4. V.C. Wright, J. Chang, G. Jeng, M. Chen, and M. Macaluso Assisted reproductive technology surveillance-United States, 2004 MMWR Surveill Summ 56 2007 1 22
5. Practice Committee of the American Society for Assisted Reproductive Medicine Guidelines on number of embryos transferred Fertil Steril 92 2009 1518 1519
6. E.S. Jungheim, G.L. Ryan, E.D. Levens, A.F. Cunningham, G.A. Macones, and K.R. Carson Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertil Steril 94 2010 1432 1436
7. L.A. Schieve, S.F. Meikle, C. Ferre, H.B. Peterson, G. Jeng, and L.S. Wilcox Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with the use of assisted reproductive technology N Engl J Med 346 2002 731 737 (Pubitemid 34983993)
8. F.M. Helmerhorst, D.A. Perquin, D. Donker, and M.J. Keirse Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception; a systematic review of controlled studies BMJ 328 2004 261 265
9. R. Jackson, K.A. Gibson, Y.W. Wu, and M.S. Croughan Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 130 2004 551 563 (Pubitemid 40459073)
10. K. Kapiteijn, C.S. de Bruijn, E. de Boer, A.J. de Craen, C.W. Burger, F.E. van Leeuwen, and F.M. Helmerhorst Does subfertility explain the risk of poor perinatal outcome after IVF and ovarian hyperstimulation? Hum Reprod 21 2006 3228 3234 (Pubitemid 44811627)
11. S. Kansal Kalra, S.J. Ratcliffe, T.A. Molinaro, K.T. Barnhart, and C. Coutifaris Advserse outcomes associated with in vitro fertilization: a role of the endocrine environment at the time of implantation Fertil Steril 90 2008 S27
12. F. Belva, S. Henriet, E. van den Abbeel, M. Camus, P. Devroey, and J. Van der Elst Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cyropreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles Hum Reprod 23 2008 2227 2238
13. A. Pinborg, A. Loft, A.K. Henningsen, S. Rasmussen, and A.N. Andersen Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study 1995-2006 Fertil Steril 94 2010 1320 1327
14. Henningsen AK, Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, Vestergaard, Forman J, Andersen AN. Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study. Fertil Steril 2011;95:959-63.
15. W. Shih, K.K. Rushford, H. Bourne, C. Garrett, J.C. McBain, D.L. Healy, and H.W.G. Baker Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggest an adverse effect of oocyte collection Hum Reprod 23 2008 1644 1653 (Pubitemid 351809716)
16. B. Kallen, O. Finnstrom, A. Lindam, E. Nilsson, K.G. Nygren, and P.O. Olausson Blastocyst versus cleavage stage transfer in in vitro fertilization: differences in neonatal outcome? Fertil Steril 94 2010 1680 1683
17. S. Kansal Kalra, S.J. Ratcliffe, K.T. Barnhart, and C. Coutifaris Day 3 vs blastocyst embryo transfer: extended embryo culture is associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery Fertil Steril 94 2010 S242
18. M. Bonduelle, I. Liebaers, V. Deketelaere, M.P. Derde, M. Camus, P. Devroey, and A. van Steirteghem Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991-1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983-1999) Hum Reprod 20 2002 413 419
19. M. Hansen, J.J. Kurinczuk, C. Bower, and S. Webb The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization N Engl J Med 346 2002 725 730 (Pubitemid 34983992)
20. A.K. Nangia, B. Luke, W. Abdel Megid, J.F. Smith, W. Mak, and J.E. Stern National study of factors influencing assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes with male factor infertility Fertil Steril 94 2010 S33