Validity of self-reported use of assisted reproductive technology treatment among women participating in the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system in five states, 2000

Maternal and Child Health Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 427-431

  Schieve, Laura A ^a   Rosenberg, Deborah ^b   Handler, Arden ^b   Rankin, Kristin ^b   Reynolds, Meredith A ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Assisted reproductive technology; Pregnancy; Survey; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONCEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MANDATORY REPORTING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF REPORT; UNITED STATES; VALIDITY;

BIRTH WEIGHT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33749024981     PISSN: 10927875     EISSN: 15736628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-006-0078-y     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, Jeng G. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2002. In: Surveillance Summaries; 2005 Jun 3; MMWR 2005;54(No. SS02):1-24.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2002 assisted reproductive technology success rates: National summary and fertility clinic reports, Atlanta, GA: CDC, 2004. All annual assisted reproductive technology success rates reports may be accessed at http://www.cdc.gov/ART/index.htm
3. Kiely JL. What is the population-based risk of preterm birth among twins and other multiples? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1998;41:3-11.
4. Martin JA, Park MM. Trends in twin and triplet births: 1980-1997. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 1999;47:1-16.
5. MacDorman MF, Martin JA, Mathews TJ, Hoyert DL, Ventura SJ. Explaining the 2001-02 infant mortality increase: Data from the linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005;53:1-24.
6. Pharoah PO. Neurological outcome in twins. Semin Neonatol. 2002;7:223-30.
7. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1856-64.
8. Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:731-37.
9. Schieve LA, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Macaluso M, Reynolds MA, Wright VC. Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:1144-53.
10. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:725-30.
11. Ericson A, Kallen B. Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:504-09.
12. Stromberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, Finnstrom O, Koster M, Stjernqvist K. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet. 2002;359:461-65.
13. Schieve LA, Wilcox LS, Zeitz J, Jeng G, Hoffman D, Brzyski R, Toner J, Grainger D, Tatham L, Younger B. Assessment of outcomes for assisted reproductive technology: Overview of issues and the US experience in establishing a surveillance system. In: Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD editors. Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction (2001: Geneva, Switzerland) Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction: Report of a WHO Meeting. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Publications; 2002. p. 363-376.