Variability of water use efficiency in grapevines

Environmental and Experimental Botany

Volumn 103, Issue , 2014, Pages 148-157

  Tomás, Magdalena ^a   Medrano, Hipólito ^a   Escalona, Jose M ^a   Martorell, Sebastià ^a   Pou, Alicia ^a,b   Ribas Carbó, Miquel ^a   Flexas, Jaume ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Drought; Genetic variability; Grapevine; Leaf water use efficiency; Whole plant water use efficiency

Indexed keywords

ARIDITY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CULTIVAR; DROUGHT STRESS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GENETIC VARIATION; MEASUREMENT METHOD; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION; RESPIRATION; VINE; VITICULTURE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

MEDITERRANEAN REGION;

VITIS;

EID: 84897958100     PISSN: 00988472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Alsina M.M., Smart D.R., Bauerle T., De Herralde F., Biel C., Stocket C., Negron C., Savé R. Seasonal changes of whole root system conductance by a drought-tolerant grape root system. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:99-109.
2. Amthor J.S. Respiration and Crop Productivity 1989, Springer-Verlag, NY.
3. Baigorri H., Antolín C., De Luis I., Geny L., Broguedis M., Aguirrezabal F., Sanchez-Diaz M. Influence of training system on the reproductive development and hormonal levels of Vitis vinífera L. cv. Tempranillo. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 2001, 52:357-363.
4. Bota J., Flexas J., Medrano H. Genetic variability of photosynthesis and water use in Balearic grapevine cultivars. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2001, 138:353-365.
5. 14C-labelled photosynthates in Vitis vinifera. Funct. Plant Biol. 2004, 31:697-708.
6. 2 and water vapour exchange across leaf cuticle (epidermis) at various water potentials. Plant Phys. 1997, 114:185-191.
7. Boyer J.S. Plant productivity and environment. Science 1982, 218:443-448.
8. Caird M.A., Richards J.H., Donovan L.A. Nighttime stomatal conductance and transpiration in C3 and C4 plants. Plant Phys. 2007, 143:4-10.
9. Chaves M.M., Maroco J.P., Pereira J.S. Understanding plant responses to drought: from genes to the whole plant. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30:239-264.
10. Chaves M.M., Oliveira Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55:2365-2384.
11. Chaves M.M., Santos T., Souza C.R., Ortuño M.F., Rodrigues M.L., Lopes C., Maroco J., Pereira J.S. Deficit irrigation in grapevine improves water-use efficiency while controlling vigour and production quality. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2007, 150:237-252.
12. Chaves M.M., Zarrouk O., Francisco R., Costa J.M., Santos T., Regalado A.P., Rodrigues M.L., Lopes C.M. Grapevine under déficit irrigation: hints from physiological and molecular data. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105:661-676.
13. Comas L.H., Eissenstat D.M., Lakso A.N. Assessing root death and root system dynamics in a study of grape canopy pruning. New Phytol. 2000, 147:171-178.
14. Condon A.G., Richards R.A., Rebetzke G.J., Farquhar G.D. Breeding for high water-use efficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55:2447-2460.
15. Correia M.J., Pereira J.S., Chaves M.M., Rodrigues M.L., Pacheco C.A. ABA xylem concentrations determine maximum daily leaf conductance of field-grown Vitis vinifera L. plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18:511-521.
16. Costa J.M., Ortuño M.F., Lopes C.M., Chaves M.M. Grapevine varieties exhibiting differences in stomatal response to water deficit. Funct. Plant Biol. 2012, 39:179-189.
17. Costa J.M., Ortuño M.F., Chaves M.M. Deficit irrigation as strategy to save water: physiology and potential application to horticulture. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49:1421-1434.
18. Craufurd P.Q., Wheeler T.R., Ellis R.H., Summerfield R.J., Williams J.H. Effect of temperature and water deficit on the water-use efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination and specific leaf area in peanut. Crop Sci. 1999, 39:136-142.
19. De Castro M., Gallardo C., Calabria S. Regional IPCC projections until 2100 in the Mediterranean area. Environmental Challenges in the Mediterranean 2000-2050 2004, 75-90. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Netherland. A. Marquina (Ed.).
20. De la Hera M.L., Romero P., Gómez-Plaza E., Martínez A. Is partial root-zone drying an effective irrigation technique to improve water use efficiency and fruit quality in field-grown wine grapes under semiarid conditions?. Agric. Water Manage. 2007, 87:261-274.
21. Dobrowsky S.Z., Pushnik J.C., Zarco-Tejada P.J., Ustin S.L. Simple reflectance indices track heat and water stress-induced changes in steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence at canopy scale. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 97:403-414.
22. Downton W.J.S., Grant W.J.R., Loveys B.R. Diurnal changes in the photosynthesis of field grown grape vines. New Phytol. 1987, 105:71-80.
23. Du T., Kang S., Zhang J., Li F., Yan B. Water use efficiency and fruit quality of table grape under alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation. Agric. Water Manage. 2008, 95:659-668.
24. Düring H. Stomatal responses to alterations of soil and air humidity in grapevines. Vitis 1987, 26:9-18.
25. Ebdon J.S., Petrovic A.M., Dawson T.E. Relationship between carbon isotope discrimination, water use efficiency and evaporation in Kentucky Bluegrass. Crop Sci. 1998, 38:157-162.
26. Escalona J.M., Flexas J., Bota J., Medrano H. Distribution of leaf photosynthesis and transpiration within grapevine canopies under different drought conditions. Vitis 2003, 42:57-64.
27. Escalona J.M., Flexas J., Medrano H. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis under water stress in field-grown grapevines. Aust. J. Plant Phys. 1999, 26:421-433.
28. Escalona J.M., Fuentes S., Tomás M., Martorell S., Flexas J., Medrano H. Responses of leaf night transpiration to wáter stress in Vitis vinífera L. Agric. Water Manage. 2013, 118:50-58.
29. Escalona J.M., Tomás M., Martorell S., Medrano H., Ribas-Carbó M., Flexas J. Carbon balance in grapevines under different soil water supply: importance of whole plant respiration. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2012, 18:308-318.
30. Farquhar G.D., Richards R.A. Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with WUE of wheat genotypes. Aust. J. Plant Phys. 1984, 11:539-552.
31. Fischer R.A., Turner N.C. Plant productivity in arid and semiarid zones. Annu. Rev. Plant Phys. 1978, 29:277-317.
32. Flexas J., Barón M., Bota J., Ducruet J.M., Gallé A., Galmés J., Jiménez M., Pou A., Ribas-Carbó M., Sajnani C., Tomàs M., Medrano M. Photosynthesis limitations during water stress acclimation and recovery in the drought adapted Vitis hybrid Richter-110 (V. berlandieri×V. rupestris). J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:2361-2377.
33. Flexas J., Bota J., Escalona J.M., Sampol B., Medrano H. Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: an evaluation of stomatal and mesophyll limitations. Funct. Plant Biol. 2002, 29:461-471.
34. Flexas J., Bota J., Loreto F., Cornic G., Sharkey T.D. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biol. 2004, 6:269-279.
35. Flexas J., Escalona J.M., Medrano H. Down regulation of photosynthesis by drought under field conditions in grapevine leaves. Aust. J. Plant Phys. 1998, 25:893-900.
36. Flexas J., Escalona J.M., Medrano H. Water stress induces different levels of photosynthesis and electron transport rate regulations in grapevines. Plant Cell Environ. 1999, 22:39-48.
37. Flexas J., Galmés J., Gallé A., Gulias J., Pou A., Ribas-Carbo M., Tomàs M., Medrano H. Improving water use efficiency in grapevines: potential physiological targets for biotechnological improvement. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2010, 16:106-121.
38. 2 as a target for increasing photosynthesis and photosynthetic water-use efficiency. Photosynth. Res. 2013, 10.1007/s11120-013-98-44-z.
39. Fraga H., Malheiro A.C., Mountinho-Pereira J., Santos J.A. An overview of climate change impacts on European viticulture. Food Energy Secur. 2013, 1:94-110.
40. Franck F., Morales J.P., Arancibia-Avendanño D., García de Cortázar V., Perez-Quezada J.F., Zurita-Silva A., Pastenes C. Seasonal fluctuations in Vitis vinifera root respiration in the field. New Phytol. 2011, 192:939-951.
41. Galmés J., Ribas-Carbó M., Medrano H., Flexas J. Response of leaf respiration to water stress in Mediterranean species with different growth forms. J. Arid Environ. 2007, 68:206-222.
42. Gaudillère J.P., van Leeuwen C., Ollat N. Carbon isotope composition of sugars in grapevine, and integrated indicator of vineyard water status. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53:757-763.
43. Ghaderi N., Talaie A.R., Ebadi A., Lessani H. The physiological response of three Iranian grape cultivars to progressive drought stress. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2011, 13:601-610.
44. Gibberd M.R., Walker R.R., Blackmore D.H., Condon A.G. Transpiration efficiency and carbon-isotope discrimination of grapevines grown under well-watered conditions in either glasshouse or vineyard. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2001, 7:110-117.
45. Giorgi F., Lionello P. Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region. Global Planet Change 2008, 63:90-104.
46. 13C) stable isotope composition of grapes cultivated in a warm climate. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2010, 16:283-289.
47. Gómez-del-Campo M., Baeza P., Ruiz C., Sotes V., Lissarrague J.R. Effect of previous water conditions on vine response to rewatering. Vitis 2007, 46:51-55.
48. Gómez-del-Campo M., Baeza P., Ruiz C., Lissarrague J.R. Water-stress induced physiological changes in leaves of four container-grown grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). Vitis 2004, 43:99-105.
49. Gómez-del-Campo M., Ruiz C., Lissarrague J.R. Effect of water stress on leaf area development, photosynthesis, and productivity in Chardonnay and Airen grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 2002, 53:138-143.
50. Huang X., Lakso A., Eissenstat D. Interactive effects of soil temperature and moisture on Concord grape root respiration. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56:2651-2660.
51. Hubick K.T., Farquhar G.D. Carbon isotope discrimination and the ratio of carbon gained to water lost in barley cultivars. Plant Cell Environ. 1989, 12:795-804.
52. Impa S.M., Nadaradjan S., Boominathan P., Shashidhar G., Bindumadhava H., Sheshshayee M.S. Carbon isotope discrimination accurately reflects variability in WUE measured at a whole plant level in rice. Crop Sci. 2005, 45:2517-2522.
53. Intrieri C., Poni S., Rebucci B., Magnanini E. Effects of canopy manipulations on whole-vine photosynthesis: results from pot and field experiments. Vitis 1997, 36:167-173.
54. IPCC Climate change: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA. S.D. Solomon, M. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (Eds.).
55. Kliewer M., Gates D. Influence of wind on microclimate, growth, productivity, and stomatal response of grapevines. Hortscience 1987, 22:1152-1153.
56. Koundouras S., Tsialtas L.T., Zioziou E., Nikolaou N. Rootstock effects on the adaptive strategies of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) under contrasting water status: leaf physiological and structural responses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 128:86-96.
57. Liu W.T., Pool R., Wenkert W., Kriedemann P.E. Changes in photosynthesis, stomatal resistance and abscisic-acid of Vitis Labruscana through drought and irrigation cycles. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 1978, 29:239-246.
58. Long S.P., Zhu X.G., Naidu S.L., Ort D.R. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields?. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29:315-330.
59. Lovisolo C., Perrone I., Carra A., Ferrandino A., Flexas J., Medrano H., Schibert A. Drought-induced changes in development and function of grapevine (Vitis spp.) organs and in their hydraulic and non-hydraulic interactions at the whole-plant level: a physiological and molecular update. Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37:98-116.
60. Maroco J.P., Rodrígues M.L., Lopes C., Chaves M.M. Limitations to leaf photosynthesis in field-grown grapevine under drought - metabolic and modelling approaches. Funct. Plant Biol. 2002, 29:451-459.
61. Medrano H., Escalona J.M., Cifre J., Bota J., Flexas J. A ten-year study on the physiology of two Spanish grapevine cultivars under field conditions: effects of water availability from leaf photosynthesis to grape yield and quality. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30:607-619.
62. Medrano H., Flexas J., Ribas-Carbó M., Gulías J. Measuring water use efficiency in grapevines. Methodologies and Results in Grapevine Research 2010, 57-70. Springer, Berlin. S. Delrot, H. Medrano, E. Or, L. Bavaresco, S. Grando (Eds.).
63. Medrano H., Pou A., Tomás M., Martorell S., Gulías J., Flexas J., Escalona J.M. Average daily light interception determines leaf water use efficiency among different canopy locations in grapevine. Agric. Water Manage. 2012, 114:4-10.
64. Morison J.I.L., Baker N.R., Mullineaux P.M., Davies W.J. Improving water use in crop production. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 2008, 363:639-658.
65. Moutinho-Pereira J.M., Correia C.M., Gonçalves B.M., Bacelar E.A., Torres-Pereira J.M. Leaf gas exchange and water relations of grapevines grown in three different conditions. Photosynthetica 2004, 42:81-86.
66. Moutinho-Pereira J.M., Magalhaes N., Gonçalves B.M., Bacelar E.A., Crito M., Correia C.M. Gas exchange and water relations of three Vitis vinifera L. cultivars growing under Mediterranean climate. Photosynthetica 2007, 45:202-207.
67. Mullins M.G., Bouquet A., Williams L.E. Biology of the Grapevine 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
68. Naor A., Bravdo B. Irrigation and water relations interactions in grapevines. Acta Hortic. 2000, 526:109-113.
69. Naor A., Bravdo B., Gelobter J. Gas exchange and water relations in field-grown Sauvignon Blanc grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 2004, 45:423-427.
70. Naor A., Bravdo B., Gelobter J. Gas exchange and water relations in field-grown Sauvignon Blanc grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 1994, 45:423-427.
71. Naor A., Wample R.L. Gas exchange and water relations of field grown concord (Vitis Labruscana Bailey) grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 1994, 45:333-337.
72. OIV - Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin Balance sobre la situación de la vitivinicultura mundial en 2010 2011, 34̊ Congreso Mundial de la Viña y el Vino, Oporto (Portugal).
73. Padgett-Johnson M., Williams L.E., Walker M.A. The influence of Vitis riparia rootstock on water relations and gas exchange of Vitis vinifera cv. Carignane scion under non-irrigated conditions. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 2000, 51:137-143.
74. Padgett-Johnson M., Williams L.E., Walker M.A. Vine water relations, gas exchange, and vegetative growth of seventeen Vitis species grown under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions in California. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. 2003, 128:269-276.
75. 2 transfer mesophyll resistance and photosynthetic efficiency in grapevine cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 2003, 97:255-263.
76. Patakas A., Noitsakis B., Chouzouri A. Optimization of irrigation water use in grapevines using the relationship between transpiration and plant water status. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 106:253-259.
77. 2 assimilation and leaf anatomical characteristics in two grapevine cultivars. Agronomie 2003, 23:293-296.
78. Petrie P.R., Trought M.C.T., Howell G.S., Buchan G.D., Palmer J.W. Whole-canopy gas exchange and light interception of vertically trained Vitis vinifera L. under direct and diffuse light. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 2009, 60:173-182.
79. Poni S., Lakso A.N., Turner J.R., Melious R.E. The effects of pre- and post-veraison water stress on growth and physiology of potted Pinot Noir grapevines at varying crop levels. Vitis 1993, 32:207-214.
80. Poni S., Bernizzoni F., Civardi S. Response of "Sangiovese" grapevines to partial root-zone drying: gas exchange, growth and grape composition. Sci. Hortic. 2007, 114:96-103.
81. Poni S., Bernizzoni F., Civardi S., Gatti M., Porro D., Camin F. Performance and water-use efficiency (single-leaf vs. whole-canopy) of well-watered and half-stressed split-root Lambrusco grapevines grown in Po Valley (Italy). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 129:97-106.
82. Pou A., Flexas J., Alsina M.M., Bota J., Carambula C., De Herralde F., Galmés J., Lovisolo C., Jiménez M., Ribas-Carbo M., Rusjan D., Secchi F., Tomàs M., Zsófi Z., Medrano H. Adjustments of water-use efficiency by stomatal regulation during drought and recovery in the drought-adapted Vitis hybrid Richter-110 (V. berlandieri×V. rupestris). Phys. Plant 2008, 134:313-323.
83. Pou A., Medrano H., Tomás M., Martorell S., Ribas-Carbó M., Flexas J. An anisohydric grapevine variety performs better under moderate water stress and recovery than isohydric varieties. Plant Soil 2012, 359:335-349.
84. Prieto J.A., Lebon E., Ojeda H. Stomatal behavior of different grapevine cultivars in response to soil water status and air water vapor pressure deficit. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin 2010, 44:9-20.
85. Quick W.P., Chaves M.M., Wendler R., David M., Rodrigues M.L., Passaharinho J.A., Pereira J.S., Adcock M.D., Leegood R.C., Stitt M. The effect of water stress on photosynthetic carbon metabolism in 4 species grown under field conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 1992, 15:25-35.
86. Read J.J., Johnson D.A., Asay K.H., Tieszen L.L. Carbon isotope discrimination, gas exchange, and water-use efficiency in Creasted Wheatgrass clones. Crop Sci. 1991, 31:1203-1208.
87. Rodrigues M.L., Chaves M.M., Wendler R., David M.M., Quick W.P., Leegood R.C., Stitt M., Pereira J.S. Osmotic adjustment in water stressed grapevine leaves in relation to carbon assimilation. Aust J. Plant Phys. 1993, 20:309-321.
88. Rogiers S.Y., Greer D.-H., Hutton R.J., Landsberg J.J. Does night-time transpiration contribute to anisohydric behaviour in a Vitis vinifera cultivar?. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:3751-3763.
89. Rogiers S., Greer D.H., Hutton R.J., Clarke S.J. Transpiration efficiency of the grapevine cv. Semillon is tied to VPD in warm climates. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2011, 158:106-114.
90. Rogiers S.Y., Simon J.C. Nocturnal and daytime stomatal conductance respond to root-zome temperature in "Shiraz" grapevines. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111:433-444.
91. Romero P., Dodd I.C., Martínez-Cutillas A. Contrasting physiological effects of partial root zone drying in field-grown grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Monastrell) according to total soil water availability. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63:4071-4083.
92. Roux D.L., Stock W.D., Bond W.J., Maphanga D. Dry mass allocation, water use efficiency and d13C in clones of Eucalyptus grandis, E. grandis×camaldulensis and E. grandis×nitens grown under two irrigation regimes. Tree Phys. 1996, 16:497-502.
93. Santesteban L.G., Miranda C., Royo J.B. Effect of water déficit and rewatering on leaf gas exchange and transpiration decline of excised leaves of four grapevine (Vitis vinífera L.) cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 121:434-439.
94. Santos T., Lopes C.M., Rodrigues M.L., Souza C.R., Maroco J., Pereira J.S., Silva J.R., Chaves M.M. Partial rootzone drying irrigation affects cluster microclimate improving fruit composition of 'Moscatel' field-grown grapevines. Sci. Hortic. 2007, 112:321-330.
95. Satisha J., Prakash G.S., Venugopalan R. Statistical modeling of the effect of physio-biochemical parameters on water use efficiency of grape varieties, rootstocks and their stionic combinations under moisture stress conditions. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2006, 30:261-271.
96. Schultz H.R., Stoll M. Some critical issues in environmental physiology of grapevines: future challenges and current limitations. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2010, 16:4-24.
97. Schultz H.R. Water relations and photosynthetic responses of two grapevine cultivars of different geographical origin during water stress. Acta Hortic. 1996, 427:251-566.
98. Schultz H.R. Climate change and viticulture: a European perspective on climatology, carbon dioxide and UV-B effects. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2000, 6:2-112.
99. Schultz H.R. Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26:1393-1405.
100. Sharma-Natu P., Ghildiyal M.C. Potential targets for improving photosynthesis and crop yield. Curr. Sci. 2005, 88:1918-1928.
101. Sivilotti P., Bonetto C., Paladin M., Peterlunger E. Effect of soil moisture availability on Merlot: from leaf water potential to grape composition. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 2005, 56:9-18.
102. Soar C.J., Dry P.R., Loveys B.R. Scion photosynthesis and leaf gas exchange in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz: mediation of rootstock effect via xylem sap ABA. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2006, 12:82-96.
103. Souza C.R., Maroco J.P., dos Santos T.P., Rodrigues M.L., Lopes C., Pereira J.S., Chaves M.M. Control of stomatal aperture and carbon uptake by déficit irrigation in two grapevine cultivars. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 106:261-274.
104. Tarara J.M., Perez-Peña J.E., Schreiner R.P., Keller M., Smithyman P. Net carbon exchange in grapevine canopies responds rapidly to timing and extent of regulated deficit irrigation. Funct. Plant Biol. 2011, 38:386-400.
105. Tardieu F., Simonneau T. Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J. Exp. Bot. 1998, 49:419-432.
106. Terashima I., Hikosaka K. Comparative ecophysiology of leaf and canopy photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18:1111-1128.
107. Tomás M., Medrano H., Pou A., Escalona J.M., Martorell S., Ribas-Carbó M., Flexas J. Water use efficiency in grapevine cultivars grown under controlled conditions: effects of water stress at the leaf and whole plant level. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2012, 18:164-172.
108. Vandeleur R.K., Mayo G., Shelden M.C., Gilliham M., Kaiser B.N., Tyerman S.D. The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine. Plant Phys. 2009, 149:445-460.
109. Virgona J.M., Hubick K.T., Rawson H.M., Farquhar G.D., Downes R.W. Genotypic variation in transpiration efficiency, carbon-isotope discrimination and carbon allocation during early growth of sunflower. Aust. J. Plant Phys. 1990, 17:207-214.
110. Weyand K., Schultz H.R. Light interception, gas exchange and carbon balance of different canopy zones of minimally and cane-pruned field-grown Riesling grapevines. Vitis 2006, 45:105-114.
111. Williams, L.E., Matthews, M.A., 1990. Grapevine. In: Irrigation of Agricultural Crops-Agronomy (Monograph nor. 30, ASA-CSSA-SSSA), pp. 1019-1055.
112. Winkel T., Rambal S. Influence of water stress on grapevines growing in the field from leaf to whole plant response. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 1993, 20:143-157.
113. Xu L.K., Hsiao T. Predicted versus measured photosynthetic water-use efficiency of crop stands under dynamically changing field environments. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55:2395-2411.
114. Zsófi Z., Gál L., Szilágy Z., Szücs E., Marschall M., Nagy Z., Bálo B. Use of stomatal conductance and pre-dawn water potential to classify terroir for the grape variety Kékfrankos. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2009, 15:36-47.
115. Zufferey V., Murisier F., Schultz H.R. A model analysis of the photosynthetic response of Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Riesling and Chasselas leaves in the field: I. Interaction of age, light and temperature. Vitis 2000, 39:19-26.