Distribution of leaf photosynthesis and transpiration within grapevine canopies under different drought conditions

Vitis

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 57-64

  Escalona, J M ^a   Flexas, J ^a   Bota, J ^a   Medrano, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Canopy location; Canopy photosynthesis; Drought; Leaf area; Light use efficiency; Vitis vinifera; Water use efficiency

Indexed keywords

VITIS; VITIS SP.; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 0042092595     PISSN: 00427500     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BALL, J. T.; WOODROW, I. E.; BERRY, J. A.; 1987: A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: J. BIGGINS (Ed.): Progress in Photosynthesis Reserach, 221-224. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.
2. CARBONNEAU, A.; 1983: Méthode simple de la surface foliaire exposée par hectare, élément déterminant du système de conduit de la vigne. Conn. Vigne Vin 17, 281-285.
3. CHAVES, M. M.; 1991: Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. J. Exp. Bot. 42, 1-16.
4. CHAVES, M. M.; HARLEY, P. C.; TENHUNEN, J. D.; LANGE, O. L.; 1987: Gas exchange studies in two grapevine cultivars. Physiol. Plant. 70, 639-647.
5. COOPER, J. P.; 1976: Photosynthesis as an industrial source. Proc. Conference Energy Environment, 99-118. Birmingham University.
6. EDSON, C. E.; HOWELL, G. S.; FLORE, J. A.; 1993: Influence of crop load on photosynthesis and dry matter partitioning of Seyval grapevines. I. Single leaf and whole vine response pre- and postharvest. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 44, 139-147.
7. ESCALONA, J. M.; FLEXAS, J.; MEDRANO, H.; 1999: Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis under water stress in field-grown grapevines. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 26, 421-433.
8. FLEXAS, J.; BOTA, J.; ESCALONA, J. M.; SAMPOL, B.; MEDRANO, H.; 2002: Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: An evaluation of stomatal and mesophyll limitations. Funct. Plant Biol. 29, 461-471.
9. FLEXAS, J.; ESCALONA, J. M.; MEDRANO, H.; 1998: Down-regulation of photosynthesis by drought under field conditions in grapevine leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 25, 893-900.
10. FLEXAS, J.; ESCALONA, J. M.; MEDRANO, H.; 1999: Water stress induces different levels of photosynthesis and electron transport rate regulations in grapevines. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 39-48.
11. INTRIERI, C.; PONI, S.; REBUCCI, B.; MAGNANINI, E.; 1997: Effects of canopy manipulations on whole-vine photosynthesis: Results from pot and field experiments. Vitis 36, 167-173.
12. KATERJI, N.; DAUDET, F. A.; CARBONNEAU, A.; OLLAT, N.; 1994: Etude àl'échelle de la plante entière du fonctionnement hydrique et photosynthétique de la vigne: Comparaison des systèmes de conduite traditionnel et en lyre. Vitis 33, 197-203.
13. KRIEDEMANN, P. E.; SMART R. E.; 1971: Effects of irradiance, temperature, and leaf water potential on vine photosynthesis. Photosynthetica 5, 6-15.
14. KULL, O.; JARVIS, P. G.; 1995: The role of nitrogen in a simple scheme to scale up photosynthesis from leaf to canopy. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 1174-1182.
15. KULL, O.; KRUIJT, B.; 1998: Leaf photosynthetic light responses: A mechanistic model for scaling photosynthesis to leaves and canopies. Funct. Ecol. 12, 767-777.
16. LAWLOR, D. W.; 1995: The effects of water deficit on photosynthesis. In: N. SMIRNOFF (Ed.): Environment and Plant Metabolism, Flexibility and Acclimation, 129-160. BIOS Scientific Publisher, Oxford.
17. LIU, W. T.; POOL, R.; WENKERT, W.; KRIEDEMANN, P. E.; 1978: Changes in photosynthesis, stomatal resistance and abscisic acid of Vitis labruscana through drought and irrigation cycles. Am. J. Plant Physiol. 29, 239-246.
18. MILLER, D. P.; HOWELL, G. S.; FLORE, J. A.; 1997: Influence of shoot number and crop load on potted Chambourcin grapevines. II. Whole-vine vs. single-leaf photosynthesis. Vitis 36, 109-114.
19. MORIANA, A.; VILLALOBOS, F. J.; FERERES, E.; 2002: Stomatal and photosynthetic responses of olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves to water deficits. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 395-405.
20. PALLIOTTI, A.; CARTECHINI, A.; 2001: Photosynthetic light response curves in relation to illumination of adaxial and abaxial surfaces of sun and shade leaves of Vitis vinifera L. Vitis 40, 175-177.
21. PETRIE, P. R.; TROUGHT, C. T.; HOWELL, G. S.; 2000: Influence of leaf aging, leaf area and crop load on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and senescence of grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot noir) leaves. Vitis 39, 31-36.
22. PONI, S.; INTRIERI, C.; MAGNANINI, E.; 2000: Seasonal growth and gas exchange of conventionally and minimally pruned Chardonnay canopies. Vitis 39, 13-18.
23. PONI, S.; INTRIERI, C.; SILVESTRONI, O.; 1994: Interactions of leaf age, fruiting, and exogenous cytokinins in Sangiovese grapevines under non-irrigated conditions. I. Gas exchange. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 45, 71-78.
24. 2O fluxes at three Mediterranean evergreen sites: Revision of current hypotheses? Glob. Chan. Biol. 8, 999-1017.
25. RIOU, C.; PIERI, P.; LE CLECH, B.; 1994: Consommation d'eau de la vigne en conditions hydriques non limitantes. Formulation simplifiée de la transpiration. Vitis 33, 109-115.
26. RIOU, C.; VALANCOGNE, C.; PIERI, P.; 1989: Un modèle simple d'interception du rayonnement solaire par la vigne. Vérification expérimentale. Agronomie 9, 441-450.
27. SCHULTZ, H. R.; 1995: Grape canopy structure, light microclimate and photosynthesis. I. A two-dimensional model of the spatial distribution of surface area densities and leaf ages in two canopy systems. Vitis 34, 211-215.
28. SCHULTZ, H. R.; 1996: Water relations and photosynthetic responses of two grapevine cultivars of different geographical origin during water stress. Acta Hort. 427, 51-266.
29. SCHULTZ, H. R.; CUEVAS, E.; LISSARRAGUE, J. R.; SCHMID, J.; 1999 a: Estimating water consumption and photosynthesis of minimal pruning (MP) and vertical shoot positioned (VSP) canopies. In: GESCO (Ed.): Proceedings of the 11th Journées Groupe d'Études des Systèmes de Conduit de la Vigne, 200-210. Sicily, Italy.
30. SCHULTZ, H. R.; LEBON, E.; ROUSSEAU, C.; 1999 b: Suitability of the 'Ball, Woodrow, Berry'-model for the description of stomatal coupling to photosynthesis of different Vitis species and Vitis vinifera cultivars in different climatic regions at various levels of water deficit. Acta Hortic. 493, 17-30.
31. SCHULTZ, H. R.; MATTHEWS, M. A.; 1988: Vegetative growth distribution during water deficits in Vitis vinifera L. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 15, 641-656.
32. SELLERS, P. J.; BERRY, J. A.; COLLATZ, G. J.; FIELD, C. B.; HALL, F. G.; 1992: Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis, and transpiration. III. A re-analysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme. Rem. Sens. Environ. 42, 187-216.
33. SMART, R. E.; 1974: Photosynthesis by grapevine canopies. J. Appl. Ecol. 11, 997-1006.
34. SOMMER, K. J.; CLINGELEFFER, P. C. R.; OLLAT, N.; 1993: Effects of minimal pruning on grapevine canopy development, physiology and cropping level in both cool and warm climates. Wein-Wiss. 48, 135-139.
35. WINKEL, T.; RAMBAL, S.; 1993: Influence of water stress on grapevine growing in the field: From leaf to whole-plant response. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 20, 143-157.
36. ZUFFEREY, V.; MURISIER, F.; 1997: Orientation des ranges de vigne et interception de l'énergie lumineuse par le feuillage. Rev. Suisse Vitic. Arboric. Hortic. 29, 239-243.
37. ZUFFEREY, V.; MURISIER, F.; SCHULTZ, H. R.; 2000: A model analysis of the photosynthetic response of Vitis vinifera L. cvs Riesling and Chasselas leaves in the field. I. Interaction of age, light and temperature. Vitis 39, 19-26.