Water-stress induced physiological changes in leaves of four container-grown grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.)

Vitis - Journal of Grapevine Research

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 99-105

  Gomez Del Campo M ^a   Baeza, P ^a   Ruiz, C ^a   Lissarrague, J R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Drought; Dry matter; Night respiration; Photosynthesis; Stomatal conductance; Transpiration; Vitaceae; Water stress

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE; VITIS; VITIS SP.; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 7444223634     PISSN: 00427500     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ALBRIZIO, R.; STEDUTO, P.; 2003: Photosynthesis, respiration and conservative carbon use efficiency of four field grown crops. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 116, 19-36.
2. ALBUQUERQUE-REGINA, M.; 1993: Réponses des cépages de Vitis vinifera L. aux variations de l'environnement: Effets de la contrainte hydrique sur la photosynthèse, la photorespiration et la teneur en acide abscissique des feuilles. Doc. Diss. Univ. Bordeaux II, France.
3. AMTHOR, J. S.; 1989: Respiration and Crop Productivity. Springer Verlag, New York.
4. BARTOLOMÉ, M. C.; 1993: Respuestas de la vid (V. vinifera L.) a condiciones de estrés hídrico: Efectos sobre las relaciones agua-planta, el crecimiento, la producción y la calidad (cv. Tempranillo). Doc. Diss., Madrid Polytechnic Univ., Spain.
5. BEGG, J. E.; TURNER, N. C.; 1976: Crop water deficits. Adv. Agron. 28, 161-217.
6. BOTA, J.; FLEXAS, J.; MEDRANO, H.; 2001: Genetic variability of photosynthesis and water use in Balearic grapevine cultivars. Ann. Appl. Biol. 138, 353-361.
7. BRAVDO, B.; LAVEE, S.; SAMISH, R. M.; 1972: Analysis of water consumption of various grapevine cultivars. Vitis 10, 279-291.
8. CARBONNEAU, A; 1998: Irrigation, vignoble et produits de la vigne. In: J. R. TIERCELIN (Ed.): Traité de Irrigation, 25-37. Tec & Doc. Paris.
9. CHAVES, M. M.; 1986: Fotossíntese e repartiçao dos produtos de assimilaçao em Vitis vinifera L. Doc. Diss., Univ. Lisbon, Portugal.
10. CHAVES, M. M., HARLEY, P. C.; TENHUNEN, J. D.; LANGE, O. L.; 1987: Gas exchange studies in two Portuguese grapevine cultivars. Physiol. Plant. 70, 639-647.
11. DURING, H.; 1980: Stomatafrequenz bei Blättern von Vitis-Arten und Sorten. Vitis 19, 91-98.
12. DÜRING, H.; 1984: Evidence for osmotic adjustment to drought in grapevine. Vitis 23, 1-10.
13. DÜRING, H.; 1987: Stomatal responses to alterations of soil and air humidity in grapevines. Vitis 26, 9-18.
14. DÜRING, H.; 1990: Stomatal adaptation of grapevine leaves to water stress. Vitis, Special Issue, 366-370.
15. DÜRING, H.; 1991: Determination of the photosynthetic capacity of grapevine leaves. Vitis 30, 49-56.
16. DÜRING, H.; BROQUEDIS, M.; 1980: Effects of abscisic acid and benzyladenine on irrigated and non-irrigated grapevines. Sci. Hort. 13, 253-260.
17. DURING, H.; LOVEYS, B. R.; 1996: Stomatal patchiness of field-grown Sultana leaves: Diurnal changes and light effects. Vitis 35, 7-10.
18. DURING, H., LOVEYS, B. R.; DRY, P. R.; 1996: Root signals affect water use efficiency and shoot growth. Acta Hortic. 427, 1-13.
19. DURING, H.; SCIENZA, A.; 1980: Drought resistance of some Vitis species and cultivars. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Grapevine Breeding, 179-190. Dept. Vitic. Enol. Univ. California, Davis.
20. EIBACH, R.; ALLEWELDT, G.; 1984: Einfluss der Wasserversorgung auf Wachstum, Gaswechsel und Substanzproduktion traubentragender Reben. II. Der Gaswechsel. Vitis 23, 11-20.
21. FANIZZA, G.; RICCIARDI, L.; 1990: Influence of drought stress, leaf growth, leaf water potential, stomatal resistance in wine grape genotypes (Vitis vinifera L.). Vitis, Special Issue, 371-381.
22. FLEXAS, J.; ESCALONA, J. M.; MEDRANO, H.; 1998: Down-regulation of photosynthesis by drought under field conditions in grapevine leaves. Aust. J. Physiol. 25, 893-900.
23. FLEXAS, J.; BOTA, J.; ESCALONA, J.M.; SAMPOL, B.; MEDRANO, H.; 2002: Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: an evaluation of stomatal and mesophyll limitations. Funct. Plant Biol. 29, 461-471.
24. FREGONI, M.; SCIENZA, A.; MIRAVALLE, R.; 1977: Évaluation précoce de la résistance des porte-greffes à la sécheresse. In: Génétique et Amelioration de la Vigne, 287-296. INRA, Bordeaux.
25. GRIMES, D. W.; WILLIAMS, L. E.; 1990: Irrigation effects on plant water relations and productivity of Thompson seedless grapevines. Crop Sci. 30, 255-260.
26. HSIAO, T. C; 1973: Plant responses to water stress. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24, 519-570.
27. JONES, H. G.; 1983: Plants and microclimate: A quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. Cambridge Univ. Press, U.K.
28. KLIEWER, W. M.; FREEMAN, B. M.; HOSSOM, C.; 1983: Effect of irrigation, crop level and potassium fertilization on Carignane vines. I. Degree of water stress and effect on growth and yield. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 34, 186-196.
29. KLIEWER, W. M.; KOBRIGER, J. M.; LIRA, R. H.; LAGIER, S. T.; DI COLLALTO, G.; 1985: Performance of grapevines under wind and water stress conditions. In: D. A. HEATHERBELL; P. B. LOMBARD; F. W. BODYFELT (Eds.): Int. Symp. Cool Climate Vitic. Enol., 198-216, Oregon.
30. KRIEDEMANN, P. E.; SMART, R. E.; 1971: Effects of irradiance, temperature and leaf water potential on photosynthesis of vine leaves. Photosynthetica 5, 6-15.
31. LAKSO, A. N.; 1985: The effects of water stress on physiological processes in fruit crops. Acta Hortic. 171, 275-289.
32. LOVEYS, B. R.; DURING, H.; 1984: Diurnal changes in water relations and abscisic acid in field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. II. Abscisic acid changes under semi-arid conditions. New Phytol. 97, 37-47.
33. LOVISOLO, C.; HARTUNG, W.; SCHUBERT, A; 2002: Whole-plant hydraulic conductance and root-to-shoot flow of abscisic acid are independently affected by water stress in grapevines. Funct. Plant Biol. 29, 1349-1356.
34. 3 plants in response to progressive drought: Stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann. Bot. 89, 895-905.
35. MEDRANO, H.; ESCALONA, J. M.; CIFRE, J.; BOTA, J.; FLEXAS, J.; 2003: A tenyear study on the physiology of two Spanish grapevine cultivars under field conditions: Effects of water availability from leaf photosynthesis to grape yield and quality. Funct. Plant Biol. 30, 607-619.
36. PEREIRA, J. S.; CHAVES, M. M.; 1993: Plant water deficits in Mediterranean ecosystems. In: J. A. C. SMITH, H. GRIFFITHS (Eds.): Water Deficits Plant Responses from Cell to Community. 237-251. Oxford Bios Scientific Publ. Ltd. U.K.
37. SCHULTZ, H. R.; 1996: Water relations and photosynthetic responses of two grapevine cultivars of different geographical origin during water stress. Acta Hortic. 427, 251-266.
38. SCHULTZ, H. R.; 2003: Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant, Cell Environ. 26, 1393-1405.
39. SCHULTZ, H. R.; MATTHEWS, M. A.; 1993: Growth, osmotic adjustment, and cell-wall mechanics of expanding grape leaves during water deficits. Crop Sci. 33, 287-294.
40. SMART, R. E.; COOMBE, B. G; 1983: Water relations of grapevines. In: T. T. KOZLOWSKI (Ed.): Water deficits and Plant Growth. Vol. VII. Chapter 4, 137-196. Academic Press, New York, USA.
41. SPRING, J. L.; 1997: Comportement physiologique des cépages Chasselas, Sylvaner, Gamay et Pinot noir dans les conditions sèches du Valais central. Rev. Suisse Vitic. Arboric. Hortic. 29, 265-271.
42. TURNBULL, M. H.; MURTHY, R.; GRIFFIN, K. L.; 2002: The relative impacts of day-time and night-time warming on photosynthetic capacity in Populus deltoides. Plant, Cell Environ. 25, 1729-1737.
43. VAN ZYL, J. L.; 1987: Diurnal variation in grapevine water stress as a function of changing soil water status and meteorological conditions. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 8, 45-52.
44. WILLIAMS, L. E., DOKOOZLIAN, N. K.; WAMPLE, R.; 1994: Grape. In: B. SCHAFFER, P. C. ANDERSEN (Eds.): Handbook of Environmental Physiology of Fruit Crops. Vol. I: Temperate crops, 85-133. CRC Press, Orlando.
45. WINKEL, T., RAMBAL, S.; 1993: Influence of water stress on grapevines growing in the field: from leaf to whole-plant response. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 20, 143-157.