Vine water relations, gas exchange, and vegetative growth of seventeen Vitis species grown under irrigated and nonirrigated conditions in California

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 128, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 269-276

  Padgett Johnson, M ^a,b   Williams, L E ^a,c   Walker, M A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Allan Hancock College   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Drought tolerance; Grapevines; Photosynthesis; Stomatal conductance; Water potential

Indexed keywords

RIPARIA; VITIS; VITIS ACERIFOLIA; VITIS AESTIVALIS LINCECUMII; VITIS ARIZONICA; VITIS BERLANDIERI; VITIS CALIFORNICA; VITIS CHAMPINII; VITIS CINEREA; VITIS DOANIANA; VITIS GIRDIANA; VITIS LINCECUMII; VITIS LONGII; VITIS RIPARIA; VITIS SOLONIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 0037365621     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.128.2.0269     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Carbonneau, A. 1985. The early selection of grapevine rootstocks for resistance to drought conditions. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 36:195-198.
2. Chartzoulakis, K., B. Noitsakis, and I. Therios. 1993. Photosynthesis, plant growth and dry matter distribution in kiwifruit as influenced by water deficits. Irr. Sci. 14:1-5.
3. Chone, X., C. van Leeuwen, S. D. Dubourdieu, and J.P. Gaudillere. 2001. Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator of grapevine water status. Ann. Bot. 87:477-483.
4. Correll, D.S. and M.C. Johnston. 1970. Manual of the vascular plants of Texas, Texas Research Foundation, Renner, Texas.
5. Delas, J.J. 1992. Criteria used for rootstock selection in France, p. 1-14. In: J.A. Wolpert, M.A. Walker. and E. Weber. (eds.). Proc. Rootstock Sem.: A worldwide perspective. Amer. Soc. Enol, Viticult., Davis, Calif.
6. Düring, H. 1984. Evidence for osmotic adjustment to drought in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.). Vitis 23:1-10.
7. Düring H. 1987. Stomatal responses to alterations of soil and air humidity in grapevines. Vitis 26:9-18.
8. 2 assimilation and photorespiration of grapevine leaves: responses to light and drought. Vitis 27:199-208.
9. Düring, H. and B.R. Loveys. 1982. Diurnal changes in water relations and abscisic acid in field grown Vitis vinifera cvs. 1. Leaf water potential components under humid temperate and semiarid conditions. Vitis 21:223-232.
10. Düring, H. and A. Scienza. 1980. Drought resistance of some Vitis species and cultivars, p. 179-190. In: Proc. 3rd Intl. Symp. Grape Breeding, Univ. Calif., Davis.
11. Fregoni, M. 1977. Irrigation des vignobles. Problemes de physiologie, de biochimie, de genetique, d'agronomie, de technologie et de'economie. Bul. O.I.V. 50:3-19.
12. Galet, P. 1979. A Practical Ampelography. Cornell Univ. Press. Ithaca, N.Y.
13. Gates, F.C. 1940. Flora of Kansas. Kan. State College Agr., Agr. Expt. Sta., Kansas State Printing Plant, Topeka.
14. Grimes, D.W. and L.E. Williams. 1990. Irrigation effects on plant water relations and productivity of 'Thompson Seedless' grapevines. Crop Sci. 30:255-260.
15. Jones, F.B. 1975. Flora of the Texas Coastal Bend. Mission Press, Corpus Christi, Texas.
16. Jones, H.G. 1992. Plants and microclimate. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
17. Kearney, T.H. and R.H. Peebles. 1951. Arizona flora. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley.
18. Kirkham, M.B. 1990. Plant responses to water deficits, p. 923-342. In: B.A. Stewart and D.R. Nielsen (eds.). Irrigation of agricultural crops. ASA-CSSA-SSSA Monogr. 30.
19. Lovisolo, C. and A. Schubert. 1998. Effects of water stress on vessel size and xylem hydraulic conductivity in Vitis vinifera L. J. Expt. Bot. 49:693-700.
20. Martin, B. and N.A. Ruiz-Torres. 1992. Effects of water-deficit stress on photosynthesis, its components and component limitations, and on water use efficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol. 100:733-739.
21. Martin, W.C. and C.R. Hutchins. 1980. A flora of New Mexico. A.R. Ganter-Verlag, Hirschberg, Germany.
22. McCree, K.J. and S.G. Richardson. 1987. Stomatal closure vs. osmotic adjustment: a comparison of stress responses. Crop Sci. 27:539-543.
23. McCutchan, H. and K.A. Shackel. 1992. Stem-water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French) J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117:607-611.
24. Mullins, M.G., A. Bouquet and L.E. Williams. 1992. Biology of the grapevine, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
25. Munson, T.V. 1909. Foundations of American grape culture. T.V. Munson and Son, Denison, Texas.
26. Munz, P.A. and D.D. Keck. 1959. A California flora. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley.
27. Ownbey, G.B. and T. Morley. 1991. Vascular plants of Minnesota. Univ. Minn. Press, Minneapolis.
28. Padgett-Johnson, M. 1999. Vine water relations, gas exchange, growth and root distribution of several Vitis species under irrigated and nonirrigated conditions. PhD thesis. Univ. Calif., Davis.
29. Padgett-Johnson, M., L.E. Williams, and M.A. Walker. 2000. The influence of Vitis riparia rootstock on water relations and gas exchange of Vitis vinifera cv. Carignane scion under non-irrigated conditions. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 51:137-143.
30. Passioura, J.B. 1994. The yield of crops in relation to drought, p. 343-359. In: K.J. Boote, J.M. Bennett, T.R. Sinclair, G.M. Paulsen (eds.). Physiology and determination of crop yield. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison Wisc.
31. Pongracz, D.P. 1983. Rootstocks for grape-vines. David Philips, Publ., Cape Town.
32. Reeves, R.G. and D.C. Bain. 1947. Flora of south central Texas. A & M College of Texas, College Station.
33. Rieger, M. and M.J. Duemmel. 1992. Comparison of drought resistance among Prunus species from divergent habitats. Tree Physiol. 11:369-380.
34. Rives, L. 1925. Recherches sur les deperissements de certains hybrids greffes. Rev. Viticult. LXII-1603:221-227.
35. Rodrigues, M.L., M.M. Chaves, R. Wendler, M.M. Davis, W.P. Quick, R.C. Leegood, M. Stitt, and J.S. Pereira. 1993. Osmotic adjustment in water stressed grapevine leaves in relation to carbon assimilation. Austral. J. Plant Physiol. 20:309-321.
36. Schultz, H.R. and M.A. Matthews. 1993. Growth, osmotic adjustment, and cell-wall mechanics of expanding grape leaves during water deficits. Crop Sci. 33:287-294.
37. Smart, R.E. and B.G. Coombe. 1983. Water relations of grapevines, p. 137-196. In: T.T. Kozlowski (ed.). Water deficits and plant growth. vol. 7. Academic Press, New York.
38. Smith, E.B. 1978. Atlas and annotated list of vascular plants of Arkansas. Univ. Ark., Fayetteville.
39. Southey, J.M. 1992. Grapevine rootstock performance under diverse conditions in South Africa, p. 27-51. In: J.A. Wolpert, M.A. Walker, and E. Weber. (eds.). Proc. Rootstock Sem.: A worldwide perspective. Amer. Soc. Enol. Viticult. Davis, Calif.
40. Steyermark, J.A. 1978. Flora of Missouri. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.
41. Stoneman, G.L., N.C. Turner, and B. Dell. 1994. Leaf growth, photosynthesis and tissue water relations of greenhouse-growth Eucalyptus marginata seedlings in response to water deficits. Tree Physiol. 14:633-646.
42. Turner, N.C. 1986. Adaptation to water deficits: A changing perspective. Austral. J. Plant Physiol. 13:175-190.
43. Winkel, T. and S. Rambal. 1990. Stomatal conductance of some grapevines growing in the field under a Mediterranean environment. Agr. For. Meterol. 51:107-121.
44. Winkler, A.J., J.A. Cook, W.M. Kliewer, and L.A. Lider. 1974. General viticulture. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley.
45. 2 assimilation. III. Influences of water stress and photoinhibition. Plant Physiol. 78:830-834.