Candidates' integration of individual psychological assessment feedback

Journal of Managerial Psychology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 341-359

  Boudrias, Jean Sébastien ^a   Bernaud, Jean Luc ^b   Plunier, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b University of Paris Cité   (France)

Author keywords

Career development; Employee development; Individual psychology; Selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897945790     PISSN: 02683946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/JMP-01-2012-0016     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ajzen, I. (1991), "The theory of planned behavior" in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 179-211.
2. Anseel, F., Lievens, F., Schollaert, E. (2009), "Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback" in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 110, No. 1, pp. 23-35.
3. Armitage, C.J., Conner, M. (2001), "Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic investigation" in British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 471-499.
4. Atwater, L.E., Brett, J.F. (2005), "Antecedents and consequences of reactions to 360-degree feedback" in Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 532-548.
5. Bell, S.T., Arthur, W. (2008), "Feedback acceptance in developmental assessment centers: the role of feedback message, participant personality, and affective response to the feedback session" in Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 681-703.
6. Braken, D.W., Rose, D.S. (2011), "When does 360-degree feedback create behavior change? And how would we know it when it does?" in Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 26, pp. 183-192.
7. Brett, J.F., Atwater, L.E. (2001), "360° feedback: accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness" in Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 5, pp. 930-942.
8. Byham, T.M. (2005), "Factors affecting the acceptance and application of developmental feedback from an executive assessment program", University of Akron, Akron, OH, unpublished doctoral thesis.
9. Doverspike, D. (2011), "Lessons from the classroom: teaching an individual psychological assessment course" in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, Vol. 4, pp. 338-341.
10. Egan, G. (2010), The Skilled Helper: A Problem-Management and Opportunity-Development Approach to Helping, Brooks Cole, Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA.
11. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
12. Fletcher, C., Baldry, C. (2000), "A study of individual differences and self-awareness in the context of multisource feedback" in Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 303-319.
13. Furnam, A., Jackson, C.J. (2011), "Practitioner reactions to work-related psychological tests" in Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 26, Nos 7-8, pp. 549-565.
14. Grewald, R., Cote, J.A., Baumgardner, H. (2004), "Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: implications for theory testing" in Marketing Science, Vol. 23, pp. 519-529.
15. Hazucha, J.F., Ramesh, A., Goff, M., Crandell, S., Gerstnen, C., Sloan, E., Bank, J., Van Katwyk, P. (2011), "Individual psychological assessment: the poster child of blended science and practice" in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, Vol. 4, pp. 297-301.
16. Highhouse, S. (2002), "Assessing the candidate as a whole: a historical and critical analysis of individual psychological assessment for personnel decision making" in Personnel Psychology, Vol. 55, pp. 363-396.
17. Hurtz, G.M., Williams, K.J. (2009), "Attitudinal and motivational antecedents to participation in voluntary employee development activities" in Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 635-653.
18. Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., Taylor, S. (1979), "Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations" in Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 349-371.
19. Jawahar, I.M. (2010), "The mediating role of appraisal feedback reactions on the relationship between rater feedback-related behaviors and rated performance" in Group and Organization Management, Vol. 35, pp. 494-526.
20. Jeanneret, R., Silzer, R. (1998), Individual Psychological Assessment: Predicting Behavior in Organizational Settings, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
21. Johns, G. (2006), "The essential impact of context on organizational behavior" in Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 386-408.
22. Kinicki, A.J., Prussia, G.E., Wu, B.J., McKee-Ryan, F.M. (2004), "A covariance structure analysis of employees' response to performance feedback" in Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, No. 6, pp. 1057-1069.
23. Kudisch, J.D. (1996), "Factors related to participants' acceptance of developmental assessment center feedback", University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, unpublished doctoral thesis.
24. Kudisch, J.D., Lundquist, C., Al-Bedah, E.A. (2004), "Accepting and applying assessment center feedback: a view from the Middle East", paper presented at the 32nd International Congress on Assessment Center Methods, Las Vegas, NV.
25. Kudisch, J.D., Lundquist, C., Smith, A.F.R. (2002), "Reactions to 'dual-purpose' assessment center feedback: what does it take to get participants to buy into and actually do something with their feedback", paper presented at the 30th International Congress on Assessment Center Methods, Pittsburgh, PA.
26. London, M. (2002), Leadership Development: Paths to Self-insight and Professional Growth, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
27. Martins, W.E., Bridgmon, K.D. (2012), Quantitative and Statistical Research Methods, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
28. Meyer, P. (1998), "Communicating results for impact" in Jeanneret, R. and Silzer, R. (Eds.), Individual Psychological Assessment: Predicting Behavior in Organizational Settings, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 243-282.
29. Moses, J. (2011), "Individual psychological assessment: you pay for what you get" in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, Vol. 4, pp. 334-337.
30. Novack, K.M. (2009), "Leveraging multirater feedback to facilitate successful behavioral change" in Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, Vol. 61, pp. 280-297.
31. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. (1986), Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
32. Plunier, P., Boudrias, J.S., Savoie, A. (2013), "Appropriation cognitive du feedback en évaluation du potentiel: validation d'une mesure" in European Review of Applied Psychology, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 87-97.
33. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.M., Lee, J., Podsakoff, N.P. (2003), "Common method variance in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies" in Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, pp. 879-903.
34. Poteet, M.L., Kudisch, J.D. (2008), "Using executive coaching to leverage assessment center feedback: tips for success", paper presented at the 34th International Congress on Assessment Center Methods, Washington, DC.
35. Ripon, A. (1998), "L'appropriation des bilans de compétences" in European Review of Applied Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 295-300.
36. Ryan, A.M., Ployhart, R.E. (2000), "Applicants' perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: a critical review and agenda for the future" in Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 565-606.
37. Ryan, A.M., Brutus, S., Greguras, G.J., Hakel, M.D. (2000), "Receptivity to assessment-based feedback for management development" in Journal of Management Development, Vol. 19, pp. 252-276.
38. Saville & Holsworth Ltd (1990), Occupational Personality Questionnaire Manual and User's Guide, Saville & Holsworth, Boston, MA.
39. Schumacker, R.E., Lomax, R.G. (2010), A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed., Routledge, New York, NY.
40. Silzer, R., Jeanneret, R. (2011), "Individual psychological assessment: a science and practice in search of common ground" in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, Vol. 4, pp. 270-296.
41. Stone, D.L., Stone, E.F. (1984), "The effect of multiple source of performance feedback and feedback favorability on self-perceived task competence and perceived feedback accuracy" in Journal of Management, Vol. 10, pp. 371-378.
42. Stone, D.L., Gueutal, H.G., McCintosh, B. (1984), "The effect of feedback sequence and expertise of the rater on the perceived feedback accuracy" in Personnel Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 487-506.
43. Swann, W.B., Griffen, J.J., Predmore, S.C., Gaines, B. (1987), "The cognitive-affective cross-fire: when self-consistency confronts self-enhancement" in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 881-889.
44. Taylor, P.J., Russ-Eft, D.F., Taylor, H. (2009), "Transfer of management training from alternate perspectives" in Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 104-121.
45. Woo, S.E., Sims, C.S., Rupp, D.E., Gibbons, A.M. (2008), "Development engagement within and following developmental assessment centers: considering feedback favorability and self-assessor agreement" in Personnel Psychology, Vol. 61, pp. 727-759.