A study of individual differences and self-awareness in the context of multi-source feedback

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 303-319

  Fletcher, Clive ^a   Baldry, Caroline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034258393     PISSN: 09631798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/096317900167047     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (1998). 360 degree feedback and leadership development. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 35-44.
2. Ashford, S. J. (1989). Self-assessments in organizations: A literature review and integrative model. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 11, 133-174.
3. Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1992). Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Personnel Psychology, 45, 141-164.
4. Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. L. (1997). Self-other rating agreement: A review and model. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 15, 121-174.
5. Atwater, L. E., Ostroff, C., Yammarino, F. J., & Fleenor, J. W. (1998). Self-other agreement: Does it really matter? Personal Psychology, 51, 3, 577-598.
6. Bass, B. M., & Yammarino, F. J. (1991). Congruence of self and others' ratings of naval officers for understanding successful performance. Applied Psychology - An International Review, 40, 437-454.
7. Belbin, R. M. (1981). Management teams: Why they succeed or fail. London: Heinemann.
8. Bettenhausen, K. L., & Fedor, D. B. (1997). Peer and upward appraisals: A comparison of their benefits and problems. Group and Organization Management, 22(2), 236-263.
9. Church, A. H. (1994). Managerial self-awareness in high performing individuals in organisations. Dissertation Abstracts International, 55-05B, 2028. University of Microfilms No. AA19427924.
10. Church, A. H. (1997). Do you see what I see? An exploration of congruence in ratings from multiple perspectives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 983-1020.
11. Dulewicz, V. (1995). A validation of Belbin's Team Roles from 16PF and OPQ using bosses ratings of competence. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 68, 81-99.
12. Edwards, J. R. (1993). Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research. Personnel Psychology, 46, 641-665.
13. Ferguson, J., & Fletcher, C. (1989). An investigation of some cognitive factors involved in person perception during selection interviews. Psychological Reports, 3(1), 735-745.
14. Fletcher, C. (1997). Self-awareness - a neglected attribute in selection and assessment? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5, 183-187.
15. Fletcher, C. (1999). The implications of research on gender differences in self assessment and 360 degree appraisal. Human Resource Management Journal, 9(1), 39-46.
16. Fletcher, C., & Baldry, C. (1999). Multi-source feedback systems: A research perspective. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 149-193). Chichester: Wiley.
17. Fletcher, C., Taylor, P., & Glanfield, K. (1996). Acceptance of personality questionnaire feedback - the role of individual difference variables and source of interpretation. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 151-156.
18. Funderberg, S. A., & Levy, P. B. (1997). The influence of individual and contextual variables on 360-degree feedback system attitudes. Group and Organization Management, 22(2), 210-235.
19. Furnham, A., & Stringfield, P. (1994). Correlates of self and subordinate ratings of managerial practices as a correlate of supervisor evaluation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 57-67.
20. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.
21. Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43-62.
22. Herold, D. M., Parsons, C. K., & Rensvold, R. B. (1996). Individual differences in the generation and processing of performance feedback. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1), 5-25.
23. Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.
24. Kendall, B., & McHenry, R. (1997). Firo-B user's manual. European English Translation. Oxford: Psychologists Press.
25. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention, theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
26. Lane, J., & Herriot, P. (1990). Self-ratings, supervisor ratings, positions and performance. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 77-88.
27. London, M. (1994). Interpersonal insight in organizations: Cognitive models for human resource development. Human Resource Management Review, 4, 311-332.
28. London, M., & Smither, J. W. (1995). Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations and performance related outcomes? Theory-based applications and directions for research. Personnel Psycholog, 48, 803-839.
29. Mabe, P. A., & West, S. G. (1982). Validity of self-evaluation of ability-a review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 280-296.
30. Mathews, B. P., & Redman, T. (1997). The attitudes of service industry managers towards upward appraisal. Career Developmental International, 2, 46-53.
31. McEvoy, G. M. (1990). Public sector managers' reactions to appraisal by subordinates. Public Personnel Management, 19, 201-212.
32. McBvoy, G. M., & Buller, P. F. (1987). User acceptance of peer appraisals in an industrial setting. Personnel Psychology, 40, 785-797.
33. Nasby, W. (1989). Private self-consciousness, self-awareness and the reliability of self-reports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 950-957.
34. Nilsen, D., & Campbell, D. P. (1993). Self-observer rating discrepancies - once an overrater, always an overrater? Human Resource Management, 32, 265-281.
35. Nydegger, R. V. (1975). Developmental changes in abstractness and moral reasoning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 4109A. University Microfilms No. 72-03, 831.
36. Pollack, D. M., & Pollack, L. J. (1996). Using 360° feedback in performance appraisal. Public Personnel Management, 25, 507-528.
37. Psychological Corporation (1991). Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Form C. Sidcup: Psychological Corporation.
38. Raphael, D., Moss, S. W., & Rosser, M. F. (1979). Evidence concerning the construct validity of conceptual level as a personality variable. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 11, 427-439.
39. Roush, P. E., & Atwater, L. (1992). Using the MBTI to understand transformational leadership and self-perception accuracy. Military Psychology, 4(1), 17-34.
40. Rubin, R. (1995). Upward appraisal: What do subordinates consider important in evaluating their supervisors? Library and Information Science Research, 17(2), 151-161.
41. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167-177.
42. VanVelsor, E., Taylor, S., & Leslie, J. B. (1993). An examination of the relationships among self-perception accuracy, self-awareness, gender and leader effectiveness. Human Resource Management, 32, 249-263.
43. Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Antonioni, D. (1998). Has 360 degree feedback gone amok? Academy of Management Executives, 12, 86-94.
44. Wohlers, A. J., & London, M. (1989). Ratings of managerial characteristics-evaluation difficulty, co-worker agreement and self-awareness. Personnel Psychology, 42, 235-261.
45. Yammarino, F. J., & Atwater, L. E. (1993). Understanding self-perception accuracy-implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 32, 231-247.
46. Yammarino, F. J., & Atwater, L. E. (1997). Do managers see themselves as others see them? Implications of self-other rating agreement for human resources management. Organizational Dynamics, 25(4), 35-44.