Novel placement of cortical bone trajectory screws in previously instrumented pedicles for adjacent-segment lumbar disease using CT image-guided navigation

Neurosurgical Focus

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Rodriguez, Analiz ^a   Neal, Matthew T ^a   Liu, Ann ^a   Somasundaram, Aravind ^a   Hsu, Wesley ^a   Branch Jr , Charles L ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjacent segment lumbar disease; Cortical bone trajectory; O arm navigation

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEURONAVIGATION; PATHOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE SCREWS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURONAVIGATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84897667745     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10920684     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.FOCUS13521     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aiki H, Ohwada O, Kobayashi H, Hayakawa M, Kawaguchi S, Takebayashi T, et al: Adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusion requiring second operation. J Orthop Sci 10:490-495, 2005
2. Gillet P: The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:338-345, 2003
3. Helgeson MD, Bevevino AJ, Hilibrand AS: Update on the evidence for adjacent segment degeneration and disease. Spine J 13:342-351, 2013
4. Kim CH, Chung CK, Park CS, Choi B, Hahn S, Kim MJ, et al: Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study. Spine J 13:1230-1237, 2013
5. Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lee SW, Ahn YJ, Kim YT, Lee DH, et al: Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 18:1637-1643, 2009
6. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Bullis D, Betz RR, Baldus C, Schoenecker PL: Results of in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 5:433-442, 1992
7. Levin DA, Hale JJ, Bendo JA: Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 65:29-36, 2007
8. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Kato T, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K: In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [epub ahead of print], 2013
9. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Nemoto O, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K: Morphometric measurement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw insertion using computed tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:E248-E253, 2013
10. Mobbs RJ: The "medio-latero-superior trajectory technique": an alternative cortical trajectory for pedicle fixation. Orthop Surg 5:56-59, 2013
11. Mok JM, Cloyd JM, Bradford DS, Hu SS, Deviren V, Smith JA, et al: Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:832-839, 2009
12. Moses ZB, Mayer RR, Strickland BA, Kretzer RM, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, et al: Neuronavigation in minimally invasive spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus 35(2):E12, 2013
13. Okuda S, Iwasaki M, Miyauchi A, Aono H, Morita M, Yamamoto T: Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1535-1540, 2004
14. Perez-Orribo L, Kalb S, Reyes PM, Chang SW, Crawford NR: Biomechanics of lumbar cortical screw-rod fixation versus pedicle screw-rod fixation with and without interbody support. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:635-641, 2013
15. Radcliff KE, Kepler CK, Jakoi A, Sidhu GS, Rihn J, Vaccaro AR, et al: Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. Spine J 13:1339- 1349, 2013
16. Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, Rodriguez-Canessa G, Lyons AS, Henson MAW, et al: Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J 9:366-373, 2009
17. Sembrano JN, Santos ERG, Polly DW Jr: New generation intraoperative three-dimensional imaging (O-arm) in 100 spine surgeries: does it change the surgical procedure? J Clin Neurosci [epub ahead of print], 2013
18. Shin MH, Hur JW, Ryu KS, Park CK: Prospective comparison study between the fluoroscopy guided and navigation coupled with O-arm© guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbosacral spines. J Spinal Disord Tech [epub ahead of print], 2013
19. Spetzger U, Von Schilling A, Winkler G, Wahrburg J, König A: The past, present and future of minimally invasive spine surgery: a review and speculative outlook. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 22:227-241, 2013
20. Tabaraee E, Gibson AG, Karahalios DG, Potts EA, Mobasser JP, Burch S: Intraoperative cone beam-computed tomography with navigation (O-ARM) versus conventional fluoroscopy (C-ARM): a cadaveric study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and safety for spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1953-1958, 2013
21. Ueno M, Imura T, Inoue G, Takaso M: Posterior corrective fusion using a double-trajectory technique (cortical bone trajectory combined with traditional trajectory) for degenerative lumbar scoliosis with osteoporosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 19:600-607, 2013
22. Van de Kelft E, Costa F, Van der Planken D, Schils F: A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels with the use of the O-arm imaging system and StealthStation Navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E1580-E1587, 2012
23. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J: Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 19:1780-1784, 2010
24. Xia XP, Chen HL, Cheng HB: Prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:597-608, 2013