A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels with the use of the O-arm imaging system and stealthstation navigation

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 25, 2012, Pages

  Van De Kelft, Erik ^a   Costa, F ^b   Van Der Planken, D ^a   Schils, F ^c  

^a Department of Neurosurgery ^*  (Belgium)

^b HUMANITAS CLINICAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Italy)

^c Clinique Saint Joseph   (Belgium)

Author keywords

2D imaging; 3D imaging; CT; Fluoroscopy; O arm; Screw placement; Spinal surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE SURGERY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WOUND CLOSURE;

ADULT; AGED; BELGIUM; BONE SCREWS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; ITALY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REGISTRIES; ROBOTICS; SACRUM; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84870956561     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318271b1fa     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 ; 21 : 1320-4.
2. Holly LT, Foley KT. Image guidance in spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 2007 ; 38 : 451-61 ; abstract viii.
3. Holly LT, Foley KT. Percutaneous placement of posterior cervical screws using three-dimensional fl uoroscopy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006 ; 31 : 536-40 ; discussion 41.
4. Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007 ; 32 : E111-20.
5. Costa F, Cardia A, Ortolina A, et al. Spinal navigation: standard preoperative versus intraoperative computed tomography data set acquisition for computer-guidance system: radiological and clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011 ; 36 : 2094-8.
6. Schils F. O-arm guided balloon kyphoplasty: preliminary experience of 16 consecutive patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2011 ; 109 : 175-8.
7. Schils F. O-arm-guided balloon kyphoplasty: prospective singlecenter case series of 54 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2011 ; 68 : 250-6 ; discussion 6.
8. Alemo S, Sayadipour A. Role of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in lumbosacral spine fusion and instrumentation: a retrospective study. World Neurosurg 2010 ; 73 : 72-6 ; discussion e7.
9. Tian NF, Xu HZ. Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2009 ; 33 : 895-903.
10. Laine T, Schlenzka D, Makitalo K, et al. Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery. A prospective clinical trial of 30 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ) 1997 ; 22 : 1254-8.
11. Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, et al. Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998 ;354: 39-48.
12. Oertel MF, Hobart J, Stein M, et al. Clinical and methodological precision of spinal navigation assisted by 3D intraoperative O-arm radiographic imaging. J Neurosurg Spine 2011 ; 14 : 532-6.
13. Larson AN, Santos ER, Polly DW Jr, et al. Pediatric pedicle screw placement using intraoperative CT and 3D image-guided navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 ; 37 : E188-94.
14. Park P, Foley KT, Cowan JA, et al. Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation utilizing O-arm fl uoroscopy with computer-assisted navigation: feasibility, technique, and preliminary results. Surg Neurol Int 2010 ; 1 : 44.
15. Santos ER, Ledonio CG, Castro CA, et al. The accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images for the assessment of pedicle screw position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 ; 37 : E119-25.
16. Santos ER, Ledonio CG, Castro CA, et al. Validity of surgeon perception of navigated pedicle screw position: a cadaveric study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011 ; 36 : E1027-32.
17. Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A, Strombeck A, et al. Radiological and clinical outcome of screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation with low-dose computed tomography. Eur Spine J 2010 ; 19 : 96-104.
18. Zhang J, Weir V, Fajardo L, et al. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system. J Xray Sci Technol 2009 ; 17 : 305-17.
19. Foley KT, Smith MM. Image-guided spine surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1996 ; 7 : 171-86.
20. Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Jost B, et al. Accuracy of computer- assisted pedicle screw placement. An in vivo computed tomography analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ) 1997 ; 22 : 452-8.
21. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, et al. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 ; 25 : 606-14.
22. Silbermann J, Riese F, Allam Y, et al. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 2011 ; 20 : 875-81.
23. Abul-Kasim K, Soderberg M, Selariu E, et al. Optimization of radiation exposure and image quality of the cone-beam O-arm intraoperative imaging system in spinal surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012 ; 25 : 52-8.
24. Park MS, Lee KM, Lee B, et al. Comparison of operator radiation exposure between C-arm and O-arm fl uoroscopy for orthopaedic surgery [published online ahead of print April 26, 2011]. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2012 ; 148 : 431-8.