Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions

Spine Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1339-1349

  Radcliff, Kristen E ^a   Kepler, Christopher K ^a   Jakoi, Andre ^b   Sidhu, Gursukhman S ^a   Rihn, Jeffrey ^a   Vaccaro, Alexander R ^a   Albert, Todd J ^a   Hilibrand, Alan S ^a  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjacent segment degeneration; Decompression; Fusion; Lumbar

Indexed keywords

ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE; ARTHRODESIS; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; DETERIORATION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LAMINECTOMY; LAMINOPLASTY; LUMBAR SPINE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE STABILIZATION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL RISK; TECHNOLOGY; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION; DECOMPRESSION; FUSION; LUMBAR;

DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 84888007595     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: 18781632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.020     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. S.D. Boden, D.O. Davis, and T.S. Dina Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 1990 403 408
2. A. Elfering, N. Semmer, and D. Birkhofer Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals Spine 27 2002 125 134
3. A.S. Hilibrand, G.D. Carlson, and M.A. Palumbo Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 1999 519 528
4. A. Kumar, J. Beastall, and J. Hughes Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years Spine 33 2008 2909 2914
5. P. Korovessis, Z. Papazisis, G. Koureas, and E. Lambiris Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results Spine 29 2004 735 742
6. J.W. Frymoyer, E.N. Hanley Jr., and J. Howe A comparison of radiographic findings in fusion and nonfusion patients ten or more years following lumbar disc surgery Spine 4 1979 435 440
7. J.H. Min, J.S. Jang, and B. Jung The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion J Spinal Disord Tech 21 2008 305 309
8. T. Iguchi, A. Kurihara, and J. Nakayama Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 25 2000 1754 1759
9. A.S. Hilibrand, and M. Robbins Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4 6 Suppl 2004 190S 194S
10. M.J. Cardoso, A.E. Dmitriev, and M. Helgeson Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? an in vitro human cadaveric assessment Spine 33 2008 2868 2873
11. L. Bresnahan, A.T. Ogden, R.N. Natarajan, and R.G. Fessler A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques Spine 34 2009 17 23
12. G.J. Regev, Y.P. Lee, and W.R. Taylor Nerve injury to the posterior rami medial branch during the insertion of pedicle screws: comparison of mini-open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion techniques Spine 34 2009 1239 1242
13. D.Y. Kim, S.H. Lee, S.K. Chung, and H.Y. Lee Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation Spine 30 2005 123 129
14. M.C. Battie, T. Videman, and J. Kaprio The twin spine study: contributions to a changing view of disc degeneration Spine J 9 2009 47 59
15. A.A. Patel, W.R. Spiker, and M. Daubs Evidence for an inherited predisposition to lumbar disc disease J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 2011 225 229
16. E. Okada, M. Matsumoto, H. Fujiwara, and Y. Toyama Disc degeneration of cervical spine on MRI in patients with lumbar disc herniation: comparison study with asymptomatic volunteers Eur Spine J 20 2011 585 591
17. T.J. Aalto, A. Malmivaara, and F. Kovacs Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review Spine 31 2006 E648 E663
18. P.M. Trief, W. Grant, and B. Fredrickson A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome Spine 25 2000 2616 2621
19. J.M. Mok, J.M. Cloyd, and D.S. Bradford Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing Spine 34 2009 832 839
20. M.O. Djurasovic, L.Y. Carreon, and S.D. Glassman Sagittal alignment as a risk factor for adjacent level degeneration: a case-control study Orthopedics 31 2008 546
21. G. Cheh, K.H. Bridwell, and L.G. Lenke Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up Spine 32 2007 2253 2257
22. K. Yamashita, K. Ohzono, and K. Hiroshima Five-year outcomes of surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study of symptom severity at standard intervals after surgery Spine 31 2006 1484 1490
23. W.R. Sears, I.G. Sergides, and N. Kazemi Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis Spine J 11 2011 11 20
24. S. Okuda, M. Iwasaki, and A. Miyauchi Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF Spine 29 2004 1535 1540
25. C.S. Lee, C.J. Hwang, and S.W. Lee Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion Eur Spine J 18 2009 1637 1643
26. G. Ghiselli, J.C. Wang, and N.N. Bhatia Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A 2004 1497 1503
27. T.W. Throckmorton, A.S. Hilibrand, and G.A. Mencio The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion Spine 28 2003 2546 2550
28. B. Yasar, S. Simsek, and U. Er Functional and clinical evaluation for the surgical treatment of degenerative stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal J Neurosurg Spine 11 2009 347 352
29. B. Jonsson, M. Annertz, C. Sjoberg, and B. Stromqvist A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. part II: five-year follow-up by an independent observer Spine 22 1997 2938 2944
30. K.A. Jansson, G. Nemeth, F. Granath, and P. Blomqvist Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years-a national analysis of 9,664 operations Eur Spine J 14 2005 659 663
31. J.N. Katz, S.J. Lipson, and L.C. Chang Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 21 1996 92 98
32. S.M. Tuli, V. Kapoor, A.K. Jain, and S. Jain Spinaplasty following lumbar laminectomy for multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis to prevent iatrogenic instability Indian J Orthop 45 2011 396 403
33. Y. Kawaguchi, H. Ishihara, and M. Kanamori Adjacent segment disease following expansive lumbar laminoplasty Spine J 7 2007 273 279
34. R. Sobottke, M. Rollinghoff, and J. Siewe Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53 2010 179 183
35. D.G. Anderson, A. Patel, and M. Maltenfort Lumbar decompression using a traditional midline approach versus a tubular retractor system: comparison of patient-based clinical outcomes Spine 36 2011 E320 E325
36. B.S. Park, Y.J. Kwon, Y.S. Won, and H.C. Shin Minimally invasive muscle sparing transmuscular microdiscectomy: technique and comparison with conventional subperiosteal microdiscectomy during the early postoperative period J Korean Neurosurg Soc 48 2010 225 229
37. K.J. Stevens, D.B. Spenciner, and K.L. Griffiths Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies J Spinal Disord Tech 19 2006 77 86
38. K. Watanabe, M. Matsumoto, and T. Ikegami Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study J Neurosurg Spine 14 2011 51 58
39. M.O. Kelleher, M. Timlin, O. Persaud, and Y.R. Rampersaud Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity Spine 35 2010 E981 E987
40. F. Pellise, A. Hernandez, and X. Vidal Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion Spine 32 2007 574 579
41. D.A. Levin, J.J. Hale, and J.A. Bendo Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 65 2007 29 36
42. P. Axelsson, R. Johnsson, and B. Stromqvist Adjacent segment hypermobility after lumbar spine fusion: no association with progressive degeneration of the segment 5 years after surgery Acta Orthop 78 2007 834 839
43. M.F. Hambly, L.L. Wiltse, and N. Raghavan The transition zone above a lumbosacral fusion Spine 23 1998 1785 1792
44. M. Penta, A. Sandhu, and R.D. Fraser Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion Spine 20 1995 743 747
45. S. Seitsalo, D. Schlenzka, M. Poussa, and K. Osterman Disc degeneration in young patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis treated operatively or conservatively: a long-term follow-up Eur Spine J 6 1997 393 397
46. E.K. Wai, E.R. Santos, R.A. Morcom, and R.D. Fraser Magnetic resonance imaging 20 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion Spine 31 2006 1952 1956
47. P. Park, H.J. Garton, and V.C. Gala Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature Spine 29 2004 1938 1944
48. H. Aiki, O. Ohwada, and H. Kobayashi Adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusion requiring second operation J Orthop Sci 10 2005 490 495
49. A.C. Disch, W. Schmoelz, and G. Matziolis Higher risk of adjacent segment degeneration after floating fusions: long-term outcome after low lumbar spine fusions J Spinal Disord Tech 21 2008 79 85
50. J.N. Katz, S.J. Lipson, and R.A. Lew Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes Spine 22 1997 1123 1131
51. P. Ekman, H. Moller, and A. Shalabi A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration Eur Spine J 18 2009 1175 1186
52. M.B. Kornblum, J.S. Fischgrund, and H.N. Herkowitz Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis Spine 29 2004 726 733 discussion 733-4
53. J.N. Katz, G. Stucki, and S.J. Lipson Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 24 1999 2229 2233
54. K.A. Jansson, P. Blomqvist, F. Granath, and G. Nemeth Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden 1987-1999 Eur Spine J 12 2003 535 541
55. K. Yamashita, K. Ohzono, and K. Hiroshima Patient satisfaction as an outcome measure after surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: testing the validity and discriminative ability in terms of symptoms and functional status Spine 31 2006 2602 2608
56. B. Jonsson, L. Sjostrom, and C. Olerud Outcome after limited posterior surgery for thoracic and lumbar spine metastases Eur Spine J 5 1996 36 44
57. J.N. Katz, S.J. Lipson, and M.G. Larson The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis J Bone Joint Surg Am 73 1991 809 816
58. K. Yamashita, J. Hayashi, K. Ohzono, and K. Hiroshima Correlation of patient satisfaction with symptom severity and walking ability after surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 28 2003 2477 2481
59. A.D. Malter, B. McNeney, J.D. Loeser, and R.A. Deyo 5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery Spine 23 1998 814 820
60. J.S. Bae, S.H. Lee, and J.S. Kim Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: minimum 3 years of follow-up Neurosurgery 67 2010 1600 1607 discussion 1607-8
61. P. Gillet The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion J Spinal Disord Tech 16 2003 338 345
62. R.A. Deyo, B.I. Martin, and W. Kreuter Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 2011 1979 1986
63. W.A. Abdu, J.D. Lurie, and K.F. Spratt Degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion method influence outcome? four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial Spine 34 2009 2351 2360
64. T.S. Videbaek, N. Egund, and F.B. Christensen Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion: the impact of anterior column support: a randomized clinical trial with an eight- to thirteen-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up Spine 35 2010 1955 1964
65. J. Anandjiwala, J.Y. Seo, and K.Y. Ha Adjacent segment degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: a prospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up Eur Spine J 20 2011 1951 1960
66. T.S. Videbaek, C.E. Bunger, and M. Henriksen Sagittal spinal balance after lumbar spinal fusion: the impact of anterior column support results from a randomized clinical trial with an eight- to thirteen-year radiographic follow-up Spine 36 2011 183 191
67. J.C. Liao, W.J. Chen, and L.H. Chen Surgical outcomes of degenerative spondylolisthesis with L5-S1 disc degeneration: comparison between lumbar floating fusion and lumbosacral fusion at a minimum 5-year follow-up Spine 36 2011 1600 1607
68. P. Zencica, R. Chaloupka, J. Hladikova, and M. Krbec Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 77 2010 124 130
69. D.W. Green, T.W. Lawhorne 3rd, and R.F. Widmann Long-term magnetic resonance imaging follow-up demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Spine 36 2011 1948 1954
70. S.J. Luhmann, L.G. Lenke, K.H. Bridwell, and M. Schootman Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis Spine 34 2009 2191 2197
71. K.J. Cho, S.I. Suk, and S.R. Park Short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis Eur Spine J 17 2008 650 656
72. B.L. Chen, F.X. Wei, and K. Ueyama Adjacent segment degeneration after single-segment PLIF: the risk factor for degeneration and its impact on clinical outcomes Eur Spine J 20 2011 1946 1950
73. C.H. Yu, J.E. Lee, and J.J. Yang Adjacent segment degeneration after single-level PLIF: comparison between spondylolytic spondylolisthesis, degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis Asian Spine J 5 2011 82 90
74. D.W. Hwang, S.H. Jeon, and J.W. Kim Radiographic progression of degenerative lumbar scoliosis after short segment decompression and fusion Asian Spine J 3 2009 58 65
75. P. Korovessis, T. Repantis, Z. Papazisis, and P. Iliopoulos Effect of sagittal spinal balance, levels of posterior instrumentation, and length of follow-up on low back pain in patients undergoing posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: a multifactorial analysis Spine 35 2010 898 905
76. T. Kaito, N. Hosono, and Y. Mukai Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space J Neurosurg Spine 12 2010 671 679
77. T. Kaito, N. Hosono, and T. Fuji Disc space distraction is a potent risk factor for adjacent disc disease after PLIF Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131 2011 1499 1507
78. Y.J. Kim, K.H. Bridwell, and L.G. Lenke An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis? Spine 31 2006 2343 2352
79. Y.J. Kim, K.H. Bridwell, and L.G. Lenke Sagittal thoracic decompensation following long adult lumbar spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: causes, prevalence, and risk factor analysis Spine 31 2006 2359 2366
80. F. Schwab, V. Lafage, A. Patel, and J.P. Farcy Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient Spine 34 2009 1828 1833
81. A. Jawahar, D.A. Cavanaugh, and E.J. Kerr 3rd Total disc arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical spine: results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials Spine J 10 2010 1043 1048
82. R.V. Botelho, O.J. Moraes, and G.A. Fernandes A systematic review of randomized trials on the effect of cervical disc arthroplasty on reducing adjacent-level degeneration Neurosurg Focus 28 2010 E5
83. R.D. Guyer, P.C. McAfee, and R.J. Banco Prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up Spine J 9 2009 374 386
84. R.C. Sasso, D.M. Foulk, and M. Hahn Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: Initial results for treatment of discogenic pain Spine 33 2008 123 131
85. J. Zigler, R. Delamarter, and J.M. Spivak Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease Spine 32 2007 1155 1162 discussion 1163
86. M.F. Gornet, J.K. Burkus, R.F. Dryer, and J.H. Peloza Lumbar disc arthroplasty with MAVERICK disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial Spine 36 2011 E1600 E1611
87. M. Kanayama, D. Togawa, and T. Hashimoto Motion-preserving surgery can prevent early breakdown of adjacent segments: comparison of posterior dynamic stabilization with spinal fusion J Spinal Disord Tech 22 2009 463 467
88. S. Schaeren, I. Broger, and B. Jeanneret Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization Spine 33 2008 E636 E642
89. D.H. Heo, Y.J. Cho, and S.M. Cho Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar dynamic stabilization using pedicle screws and a nitinol spring rod system with 2-year minimum follow-up J Spinal Disord Tech 25 2011 509 514