Update on the evidence for adjacent segment degeneration and disease

Spine Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 342-351

  Helgeson, Melvin D ^a   Bevevino, Adam J ^a   Hilibrand, Alan S ^b  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjacent segment; Arthrodesis; Arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION; ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTHRODESIS; ARTHROPLASTY; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL SPINE; DEGENERATION; DISEASE COURSE; DISKOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; KLIPPEL FEIL SYNDROME; LUMBAR SPINE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; SPINE DISEASE; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; SPINAL FUSION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84875502676     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: 18781632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.12.009     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. S.S. Rajaee, H.W. Bae, L.E. Kanim, and R.B. Delamarter Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008 Spine 37 2012 67 76
2. A.S. Hilibrand, G.D. Carlson, and M.A. Palumbo Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 1999 519 528
3. H. Ishihara, R. Osada, and M. Kanamori Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis J Spinal Disord 14 2001 91 99
4. V. Kulkarni, V. Rajshekhar, and L. Raghuram Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence J Neurosurg 100 1 Suppl Spine 2004 2 6
5. P. Park, H.J. Garton, and V.C. Gala Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature Spine 29 2004 1938 1944
6. G. Cheh, K.H. Bridwell, and L.G. Lenke Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up Spine 32 2007 2253 2257
7. D.A. Levin, J.J. Hale, and J.A. Bendo Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 65 2007 29 36
8. K.H. Kim, S.H. Lee, and C.S. Shim Adjacent segment disease after interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixations for isolated L4-L5 spondylolisthesis: a minimum five-year follow-up Spine 35 2010 625 634
9. P.D. Nunley, A. Jawahar, and E.J. Kerr 3rd Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty: 2-4 years follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials Spine 37 2012 445 451
10. W.R. Sears, I.G. Sergides, and N. Kazemi Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis Spine J 11 2011 11 20
11. J.S. Harrop, J.A. Youssef, and M. Maltenfort Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty Spine 33 2008 1701 1707
12. B.J. Garrido, T.A. Taha, and R.C. Sasso Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up J Spinal Disord Tech 23 2010 367 371
13. K.J. Song, B.W. Choi, and T.S. Jeon Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments Eur Spine J 20 2011 1940 1945
14. P. Fritzell, O. Hagg, P. Wessberg, and A. Nordwall 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group Spine 26 2001 2521 2532 discussion 2532-4
15. S. Okuda, M. Iwasaki, and A. Miyauchi Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF Spine 29 2004 1535 1540
16. C.S. Chen, C.K. Cheng, C.L. Liu, and W.H. Lo Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine Med Eng Phys 23 2001 483 491
17. G. Ghiselli, J.C. Wang, and N.N. Bhatia Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A 2004 1497 1503
18. M.D. Rahm, and B.B. Hall Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study J Spinal Disord 9 1996 392 400
19. M.N. Kumar, A. Baklanov, and D. Chopin Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion Eur Spine J 10 2001 314 319
20. J. Anandjiwala, J.Y. Seo, and K.Y. Ha Adjacent segment degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: a prospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up Eur Spine J 20 2011 1951 1960
21. S.L. Weinhoffer, R.D. Guyer, M. Herbert, and S.L. Griffith Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study Spine 20 1995 526 531
22. N. Boos, R. Rieder, and V. Schade 1995 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception, and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations Spine 20 1995 2613 2625
23. M.C. Jensen, M.N. Brant-Zawadzki, and N. Obuchowski Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain N Engl J Med 331 1994 69 73
24. S.D. Boden, D.O. Davis, and T.S. Dina Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 1990 403 408
25. D.G. Borenstein, J.W. O'Mara Jr., and S.D. Boden The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects: a seven-year follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A 2001 1306 1311
26. A. Elfering, N. Semmer, and D. Birkhofer Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals Spine 27 2002 125 134
27. G. Blumenkrantz, J. Zuo, and X. Li In vivo 3.0-tesla magnetic resonance T1rho and T2 relaxation mapping in subjects with intervertebral disc degeneration and clinical symptoms Magn Reson Med 63 2010 1193 1200
28. J.D. Auerbach, W. Johannessen, and A. Borthakur In vivo quantification of human lumbar disc degeneration using T(1rho)-weighted magnetic resonance imaging Eur Spine J 15 3 Suppl 2006 S338 S344
29. M.B. Dekutoski, M.J. Schendel, and J.W. Ogilvie Comparison of in vivo and in vitro adjacent segment motion after lumbar fusion Spine 19 1994 1745 1751
30. E. Chosa, K. Goto, K. Totoribe, and N. Tajima Analysis of the effect of lumbar spine fusion on the superior adjacent intervertebral disk in the presence of disk degeneration, using the three-dimensional finite element method J Spinal Disord Tech 17 2004 134 139
31. M.O. Djurasovic, L.Y. Carreon, and S.D. Glassman Sagittal alignment as a risk factor for adjacent level degeneration: a case-control study Orthopedics 31 2008 546
32. H. Aiki, O. Ohwada, and H. Kobayashi Adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusion requiring second operation J Orthop Sci 10 2005 490 495
33. J.H. Min, J.S. Jang, and S.H. Lee Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis J Neurosurg Spine 7 2007 21 26
34. E.K. Wai, E.R. Santos, R.A. Morcom, and R.D. Fraser Magnetic resonance imaging 20 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion Spine 31 2006 1952 1956
35. M.J. Cardoso, A.E. Dmitriev, and M. Helgeson Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? An in vitro human cadaveric assessment Spine 33 2008 2868 2873
36. Q.B. Bao, and H.A. Yuan Artificial disc technology Neurosurg Focus 9 2000 e14
37. V.C. Traynelis The Prestige cervical disc replacement Spine J 4 6 Suppl 2004 310S 314S
38. H. Le, I. Thongtrangan, and D.H. Kim Historical review of cervical arthroplasty Neurosurg Focus 17 2004 E1
39. R.D. Guyer, P.C. McAfee, and R.J. Banco Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up Spine J 9 2009 374 386
40. S.H. Hochschuler, D.D. Ohnmeiss, R.D. Guyer, and S.L. Blumenthal Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States Eur Spine J 11 2 Suppl 2002 S106 S110
41. S.K. Mirza Point of view: commentary on the research reports that led to Food and Drug Administration approval of an artificial disc Spine 30 2005 1561 1564
42. Y. Morishita, H. Ohta, and M. Naito Kinematic evaluation of the adjacent segments after lumbar instrumented surgery: a comparison between rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization Eur Spine J 20 2011 1480 1485
43. S. Schaeren, I. Broger, and B. Jeanneret Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization Spine 33 2008 E636 E642
44. K.J. Schnake, S. Schaeren, and B. Jeanneret Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis Spine 31 2006 442 449
45. J.S. Bae, S.H. Lee, and J.S. Kim Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: minimum 3 years of follow-up Neurosurgery 67 2010 1600 1607 discussion 1607-8
46. D.Y. Lee, S.H. Lee, and D.H. Maeng Two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a minimum 3-year follow-up study Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 50 2010 645 650
47. P. Korovessis, Z. Papazisis, G. Koureas, and E. Lambiris Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results Spine 29 2004 735 742
48. M. Matsumoto, E. Okada, and D. Ichihara Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study Spine 35 2010 36 43
49. U.K. Chang, D.H. Kim, and M.C. Lee Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion J Neurosurg Spine 7 2007 33 39
50. M.A. Finn, D.S. Brodke, and M. Daubs Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty Eur Spine J 18 2009 1520 1527
51. M.P. Kelly, J.M. Mok, R.F. Frisch, and B.K. Tay Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial Spine 36 2011 1171 1179
52. A. Nassr, J.Y. Lee, and R.S. Bashir Does incorrect level needle localization during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion lead to accelerated disc degeneration? Spine 34 2009 189 192
53. O.A. Anakwenze, J.D. Auerbach, and A.H. Milby Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial Spine 34 2009 2001 2007
54. B.W. Cunningham, N. Hu, C.M. Zorn, and P.C. McAfee Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics Spine J 10 2010 341 349
55. D.D. Samartzis, J. Herman, J.P. Lubicky, and F.H. Shen Classification of congenitally fused cervical patterns in Klippel-Feil patients: epidemiology and role in the development of cervical spine-related symptoms Spine 31 2006 E798 E804
56. J.T. Guille, A. Miller, and J.R. Bowen The natural history of Klippel-Feil syndrome: clinical, roentgenographic, and magnetic resonance imaging findings at adulthood J Pediatr Orthop 15 1995 617 626
57. B.J. Garrido, J. Wilhite, and M. Nakano Adjacent-level cervical ossification after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 2011 1185 1189
58. J.T. Robertson, S.M. Papadopoulos, and V.C. Traynelis Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study J Neurosurg Spine 3 2005 417 423
59. J.B. Park, Y.S. Cho, and K.D. Riew Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 2005 558 563
60. J.K. Burkus, R.W. Haid, V.C. Traynelis, and P.V. Mummaneni Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial J Neurosurg Spine 13 2010 308 318
61. A. Nabhan, F. Ahlhelm, and T. Pitzen Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study Eur Spine J 16 2007 423 430
62. A.E. Dmitriev, B.W. Cunningham, and N. Hu Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model Spine 30 2005 1165 1172
63. D.K. Park, E.L. Lin, and F.M. Phillips Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis Spine 36 2011 721 730
64. S.W. Kim, M.A. Limson, and S.B. Kim Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases Eur Spine J 18 2009 218 231
65. A. Jawahar, D.A. Cavanaugh, and E.J. Kerr 3rd Total disc arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical spine: results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials Spine J 10 2010 1043 1048
66. C.V. Maldonado, R.D. Paz, and C.B. Martin Adjacent-level degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion Eur Spine J 20 3 Suppl 2011 403 407