Evaluating single-case research data for systematic review: A commentary for the special issue

Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 237-241

  Maggin, Daniel M ^a   Odom, Samuel L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Effect size; Meta analysis; Single case research; Single subject research; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84897641586     PISSN: 00224405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Borenstein M., Hedges L.V., Higgins J.P., Rothstein H.R. Introduction to meta-analysis 2009, Wiley, West Sussex, UK.
2. Campbell J.M. Commentary on PND at 25. Remedial and Special Education 2013, 34:20-25.
3. Campbell J.M., Herzinger C.V. Statistics and single-subject research methodology. Single-subject research methodology in behavioral sciences 2010, 417-453. Routledge, New York. D.L. Gast (Ed.).
4. Cooper H., Hedges L.V. Research synthesis as a scientific process. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis 2009, 3-16. Sage, New York, NY. 2nd ed. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, J.C. Valentine (Eds.).
5. Danov S.E., Symons F.J. A survey evaluation of the reliability of visual inspection and functional analysis graphs. Behavior Modification 2008, 32:828-839.
6. Fisher W.W., Kelley M.E., Lomas J.E. Visual aids and structured criteria for improving visual inspection and interpretation of single-case designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2003, 36:387-406.
7. Gast D.L. Replication. Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences 2010, 199-233. Routledge, New York, NY. D.L. Gast (Ed.).
8. Hagopian L.P., Fisher W.W., Thompson R.H., Owen-DeSchryver J., Iwata B.A., Wacker D.P. Toward the development of structured criteria for interpretation of functional analysis data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1997, 30:313-326.
9. Horner R.H., Carr E.G., Halle J., Mcgee G., Odom S., Wolery M. The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children 2005, 71:165-179.
10. Horner R.H., Swaminathan H., Sugai G., Smolkowski K. Considerations for the systematic analysis and use of single-case research. Education and Treatment of Children 2012, 35:269-290.
11. Johnston J.M., Pennypacker H.S. Strategies and tactics of human behavior research 2009, Routledge, New York, NY. 3rd ed.
12. Kratochwill T.R., Hitchcock J.H., Horner R.H., Levin J.R., Odom S.L., Rindskopf D.M., et al. Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education 2013, 34:26-38.
13. Lambert M.C., Cartledge G., Heward W.L., Lo Y.Y. Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 2006, 8:88-99.
14. Lieberman R.G., Yoder P.J., Reichow B., Wolery M. Visual analysis of multiple baseline across participants graphs when change is delayed. School Psychology Quarterly 2010, 25:28.
15. Maggin D.M., Johnson A.H., Chafouleas S.M., Ruberto L.M., Berggren M. A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology 2012, 50:625-654.
16. Mercer S.H., Sterling H.E. The impact of baseline trend control on visual analysis of single-case data. Journal of School Psychology 2012, 50:403-419.
17. Moeyaert M., Ferron J.F., Beretvas S.N., Van den Noortgate W.V. From a single-level analysis to a multilevel analysis of single-case experimental designs. Journal of School Psychology 2014, 52(2):83-103. (in this issue).
18. Mooney P., Epstein M.H., Reid R., Nelson J.R. Status of and trends in academic intervention research for students with emotional disturbance. Remedial and Special Education 2003, 24:273-287.
19. Perone M. Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Experimental control is better. The Behavior Analyst 1999, 22:109.
20. Rindskopf D. Nonlinear Bayesian analysis of single-case designs. Journal of School Psychology 2014, 52(2):71-81. (in this issue).
21. Scruggs T.E., Mastropieri M.A. PND at 25: Past, present, and future trends in summarizing single-subject research. Remedial and Special Education 2013, 34:9-19.
22. Shadish W.R. Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs: An introduction. Journal of School Psychology 2014, 52(2):1-14. (in this issue).
23. Shadish W.R., Hedges L.V., Pustejovsky J.E. Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: A primer and application. Journal of School Psychology 2014, 52(2):15-39. (in this issue).
24. Shadish W.R., Kyse E.N., Rindskopf D.M. Analyzing data from single-case designs using multilevel models: New applications and some agenda items for future research. Psychological Methods 2013, 18:385.
25. Shadish W.R., Rindskopf D.M. Methods for evidence-based practice: Quantitative synthesis of single-subject designs. New Directions for Evaluation 2007, 113:95-109.
26. Shadish W.R., Zuur A.F., Sullivan K.J. Using generalized additive (mixed)models to analyze single-case designs. Journal of School Psychology 2014, 52(2):41-70. (in this issue).
27. Simpson R.L. Policy-related research issues and perspectives. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 2003, 18:192-196.
28. Strain P.S., Kohler F.W., Gresham F. Problems in logic and interpretation with quantitative syntheses of single-case research: Mathur and Colleagues (1998) as a case in point. Behavioral Disorders 1998, 24:74-85.
29. Swaminathan H., Rogers H.J., Horner R.H. An effect size measure and Bayesian analysis of single-case designs. Journal of School Psychology 2014, 52(2):105-122. (in this issue).
30. Van den Noortgate W., Onghena P. A multilevel meta-analysis of single-subject experimental design studies. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 2008, 2:142-151.
31. Wong C., Odom S.L., Hume K., Cox A.W., Fettig A., Kucharczyk S., et al. Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder 2013, The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group, Chapel Hill, NC.