Deterring Gang-Involved Gun Violence: Measuring the Impact of Boston's Operation Ceasefire on Street Gang Behavior

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 113-139

  Braga, Anthony A ^a,b   Hureau, David M ^b   Papachristos, Andrew V ^b,c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Deterrence; Gang violence; Guns; Problem oriented policing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897584553     PISSN: 07484518     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10940-013-9198-x     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Apel RJ, Nagin D (2011) General deterrence: a review of recent evidence. In: Wilson JQ, Petersilia J (eds) Crime and public policy. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 411-436.
2. Apel RJ, Sweeten G (2010) Propensity score matching in criminology and criminal justice. In: Piquero A, Weisburd DL (eds) Handbook of quantitative criminology. Springer, New York, pp 543-562.
3. Austin P, Grootendorst P, Anderson G (2007) A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med 26: 734-753.
4. Berk R (2005) Knowing when to fold 'em: an essay on evaluating the impact of Ceasefire, Compstat, and Exile. Criminol Public Policy 4: 451-466.
5. Black D (1970) The production of crime rates. Am Sociol Rev 35: 733-748.
6. Blalock H (1979) Social statistics, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
7. Blumstein A (1995) Youth violence, guns, and the illicit-drug industry. J Crim Law Criminol 86: 10-36.
8. Blumstein A, Cohen J, Nagin D (eds) (1978) Deterrence and incapacitation: estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
9. Braga AA (2012) Getting deterrence right? Evaluation evidence and complementary crime control mechanisms. Criminol Public Policy 11: 201-210.
10. Braga AA, Weisburd DL (2012) The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. J Res Crime Delinq 49: 323-358.
11. Braga AA, Winship C (2006) Partnership, accountability, and innovation: clarifying Boston's experience with pulling levers. In: Weisburd DL, Braga AA (eds) Police innovation: contrasting perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 171-190.
12. Braga AA, Kennedy DM, Waring E, Piehl AM (2001) Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: an evaluation of Boston's Operation Ceasefire. J Res Crime Delinq 38: 195-225.
13. Braga AA, Hureau DM, Winship C (2008a) Losing faith? Police, black churches, and the resurgence of youth violence in Boston. Ohio State J Crim Law 6: 141-172.
14. Braga AA, Pierce G, McDevitt J, Bond BJ, Cronin S (2008b) The strategic prevention of gun violence among gang-involved offenders. Justice Q 25: 132-162.
15. Butterfield F (1996) In Boston, nothing is something. The New York Times, November 21: A20.
16. Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2005) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching (discussion paper 1588). Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn.
17. Campbell DT, Boruch RF (1975) Making the case for randomized assignment to treatment by considering the alternatives. In: Bennett C, Lumsdaine A (eds) Evaluation and experiments: some critical issues in assessing social programs. Academic Press, New York, pp 195-296.
18. Cohen J, Ludwig J (2003) Policing crime guns. In: Ludwig J, Cook PJ (eds) Evaluating gun policy: effects on crime and violence. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 217-239.
19. Cook PJ (1980) Research in criminal deterrence: laying the groundwork for the second decade. In: Morris N, Tonry M (eds) Crime and justice: an annual review of research, vol 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 211-268.
20. Cook P, Laub J (2002) After the epidemic: recent trends in youth violence in the United States. In: Tonry M (ed) Crime and justice: a review of research, vol 29. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1-38.
21. Cook PJ, Ludwig J (2006) Aiming for evidence-based gun policy. J Policy Anal Manage 48: 691-735.
22. Corsaro N, McGarrell EF (2009) Testing a promising homicide reduction strategy: reassessing the impact of the Indianapolis "pulling levers" intervention. J Exp Criminol 5: 63-82.
23. Corsaro N, Hunt ED, Hipple NK, McGarrell EF (2012) The impact of drug market pulling levers policing on neighborhood violence: an evaluation of the High Point drug market intervention. Criminol Public Policy 11: 167-200.
24. Dalton E (2002) Targeted crime reduction efforts in ten communities: lessons for the project safe neighborhoods initiative. US Attorney's Bull 50: 16-25.
25. Decker S (1996) Collective and normative features of gang violence. Justice Q 13: 243-264.
26. Decker S, Katz C, Webb V (2008) Understanding the black box of gang organization: implications for involvement in violent crime, drug sales, and violent victimization. Crime Delinq 54: 153-172.
27. Dehejia RH, Wahba S (2002) Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev Econ Stat 84: 151-161.
28. DiPrete T, Gangl M (2004) Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociol Methodol 34: 271-310.
29. Durlauf S, Nagin D (2011) Imprisonment and crime: can both be reduced? Criminol Public Policy 10: 13-54.
30. Ellement JR (2007) 25 alleged Boston gang members charged with gun, drug offenses. The Boston Globe, May 24, p A1.
31. Engel RS, Skubak Tillyer M, Corsaro N (2011) Reducing gang violence using focused deterrence: evaluating the cincinnati initiative to reduce violence (CIRV). Justice Q. doi: 10. 1080/07418825. 2011. 619559.
32. Fagan J (2002) Policing guns and youth violence. Future Child 12: 133-151.
33. Farrington D, Gottfredson D, Sherman L, Welsh B (2002) The Maryland scientific methods scale. In: Sherman L, Farrington D, Welsh B, MacKenzie D (eds) Evidence-based crime prevention. Routledge, London, pp 13-21.
34. Gelman A (2005) Analysis of variance: why it is more important than ever. Ann Stat 33: 1-53.
35. Gibbs JP (1975) Crime, punishment, and deterrence. Elsevier, New York.
36. Heckman J, Ichimura H, Todd P (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Rev Econ Stud 64: 605-654.
37. Heckman J, LaLonde R, Smith J (1999) The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1865-2097.
38. Horney J, Marshall IH (1992) Risk perceptions among serious offenders: the role of crime and punishment. Criminology 30: 575-594.
39. Hughes L, Short J (2005) Disputes involving gang members: micro-social contexts. Criminology 43: 43-76.
40. Imbens GW (2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Rev Econ Stat 86: 4-29.
41. Imbens GW, Wooldredge J (2009) Some recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J Econ Lit 47: 5-86.
42. Kennedy DM (1997) Pulling levers: chronic offenders, high-crime settings, and a theory of prevention. Valparaiso Univ Law Rev 31: 449-484.
43. Kennedy DM (2011) Don't shoot. Bloomsbury, New York.
44. Kennedy DM, Piehl AM, Braga AA (1996) Youth violence in Boston: gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use-reduction strategy. Law Contemp Probl 59: 147-196.
45. Kennedy DM, Braga AA, Piehl AM (1997) The (un)known universe: mapping gangs and gang violence in Boston. In: Weisburd D, McEwen JT (eds) Crime mapping and crime prevention. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, pp 219-262.
46. Klein M (1993) Attempting gang control by suppression: the misuse of deterrence principles. Stud Crime Crime Prev 2: 88-111.
47. Klofas J, Hipple NK (2006) Crime incident reviews. Project safe neighborhoods: strategic interventions case study 3. US Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
48. Leuven E, Sianesi B (2003) PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Available online: http://ideas. repec. org/c/boc/bocode/s432001. html.
49. Levitt S, Venkatesh S (2000) An economic analysis of a drug-selling gang's finances. Q J Econ 115: 755-789.
50. Lipsey M, Wilson DB (2001) Practical meta-analysis. Applied social research methods series, vol 49. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
51. Long JS, Freese J (2006) Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. StataCorp, LP, College Station.
52. Loughran T, Paternoster R, Piquero A, Pogarsky G (2011a) On ambiguity in perceptions of risk: implications for criminal decision making and deterrence. Criminology 49: 1029-1061.
53. Loughran T, Pogarsky G, Piquero A, Paternoster R (2011b) Re-examining the functional form of the certainty effect in deterrence theory. Justice Q 29(5): 712-741.
54. Ludwig J (2005) Better gun enforcement, less crime. Criminol Public Policy 4: 677-716.
55. McGarrell EF, Chermak S, Weiss A, Wilson J (2001) Reducing firearms violence through directed police patrol. Criminol Public Policy 1: 119-148.
56. McGarrell EF, Chermak S, Wilson J, Corsaro N (2006) Reducing homicide through a 'lever-pulling' strategy. Justice Q 23: 214-229.
57. Morenoff JD, Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW (2001) Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology 39: 517-559.
58. Morgan SL, Winship C (2007) Counterfactuals and causal inference: methods and principals for social research. Cambridge University Press, New York.
59. Nagin D (1998) Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. In: Tonry M (ed) Crime and justice: a review of research, vol 23. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1-42.
60. Papachristos A (2009) Murder by structure: dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide. Am J Soc 115: 74-128.
61. Papachristos A, Kirk D (2006) Neighborhood effects and street gang behavior. In: Short J (ed) Studying youth gangs. Alta Mira, Landham, pp 63-84.
62. Papachristos A, Meares T, Fagan J (2007) Attention felons: evaluating project safe neighborhoods in Chicago. J Emp Legal Stud 4: 223-272.
63. Paternoster R (1987) The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: a review of the evidence and issues. Justice Q 4: 173-217.
64. Piehl AM, Cooper SJ, Braga AA, Kennedy DM (2003) Testing for structural breaks in the evaluation of programs. Rev Econ Stat 85: 550-558.
65. Rosenbaum P (2002) Observational studies, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.
66. Rosenbaum P, Rubin D (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70: 41-55.
67. Rosenbaum P, Rubin D (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat 39: 33-38.
68. Rosenfeld R, Bray TM, Egley A (1999) Facilitating violence: a comparison of gang-motivated, gang-affiliated, and nongang youth homicides. J Quant Criminol 15: 495-516.
69. Rosenfeld R, Fornango R, Baumer E (2005) Did Ceasefire, Compstat, and Exile reduce homicide? Criminol Public Policy 4: 419-450.
70. Rossi PH, Lipsey M, Freeman H (2006) Evaluation: a systematic approach, 7th edn. Sage, Newbury Park.
71. Rubin DB (1990) Formal modes of statistical inferences for causal effects. J Stat Plan Inference 25: 279-292.
72. Sampson RJ, Wilson WJ (1995) Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In: Hagan J, Peterson R (eds) Crime and inequality. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 37-56.
73. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277: 918-924.
74. Schneider VW, Wiersema B (1990) Limits and use of uniform crime reports. In: MacKenzie DL, Baunach PJ, Roberg RR (eds) Measuring crime. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 21-48.
75. Seabrook J (2009) Don't shoot: a radical approach to the problem of gang violence. The New Yorker, June 22, pp 32-39.
76. Shadish W, Cook T, Campbell D (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
77. Sherman LW, Rogan D (1995) Effects of gun seizures on gun violence: 'hot spots' patrol in Kansas City. Justice Q 12: 755-782.
78. Sherman LW, Gottfredson D, MacKenzie DL, Eck JE, Reuter P, Bushway S (1997) Preventing crime: what works, what doesn't, what's promising. U. S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
79. Singer JD, Willet JB (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press, New York.
80. Smith C (2012) The influence of gentrification on gang homicides in Chicago neighborhoods, 1994 to 2005. Crime Delinq. doi: 10. 1177/0011128712446052.
81. Smith J, Todd P (2005) Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators? J Econom 125: 303-353.
82. Tita G, Greenbaum R (2009) Crime, neighborhoods, and units of analysis: putting space in its place. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma G (eds) Putting crime in its place. Springer, New York, pp 145-170.
83. Tita G, Radil S (2011) Spatializing the social networks of gangs to explore patterns of violence. J Quant Criminol 27: 521-545.
84. Tita G, Riley J, Ridgeway G, Grammich C, Abrahamse A, Greenwood P (2004) Reducing gun violence: results from an intervention in East Los Angeles. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica.
85. Travis J (1998) Crime, justice, and public policy. Plenary presentation to the American Society of Criminology, (http://www. ojp. usdoj. gov/nij/speeches/asc. htm), November 1, Washington, DC.
86. Weisburd D, Lum C, Petrosino A (2001) Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice? Annals 578: 50-70.
87. Wellford CF, Pepper JV, Petrie CV (eds) (2005) Firearms and violence: a critical review. Committee to improve research information and data on firearms. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
88. Welsh BC, Peel ME, Farrington DP, Elffers H, Braga AA (2011) Research design influence on study outcomes in crime and justice: a partial replication with public area surveillance. J Exp Criminol 7: 183-198.
89. Wilkinson L, Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) Statistical methods in psychology journals: guidelines and expectations. Am Psychol 54: 594-604.
90. Witkin G (1997) Sixteen silver bullets: smart ideas to fix the world. US News and World Report, December 29, p 67.
91. Wright B, Caspi A, Moffitt T, Paternoster R (2004) Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals? Rational choice, self-control, and crime. J Res Crime Delinq 41: 180-213.
92. Zimring F (1968) Is gun control likely to reduce violent killings? Univ Chic Law Rev 35: 21-37.
93. Zimring F (1972) The medium is the message: Firearm caliber as a determinant of death from assault. J Legal Stud 1: 97-124.
94. Zimring F, Hawkins G (1973) Deterrence: the legal threat in crime control. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.