Re-Examining the Functional Form of the Certainty Effect in Deterrence Theory

Justice Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 712-741

  Loughran, Thomas A ^a   Pogarsky, Greg ^b   Piquero, Alex R ^c   Paternoster, Raymond ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

decision making; deterrence; nonparametric regression; perceptions; Prospect Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867281317     PISSN: 07418825     EISSN: 17459109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2011.583931     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Allais, M. 1953. Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école Américaine. Econometrica, 21: 503-546.
2. Andenaes, J. 1974. Punishment and deterrence, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3. Anwar, S., & Loughran, T. A. (2011). Testing a Bayesian learning theory of deterrence among serious juvenile offenders. Criminology, 49 (3).
4. Beccaria, C. (1985). On crimes and punishments. New York, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1764)
5. Becker, G. 1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy, 76: 169-217.
6. Berk, R. 2009. Can't tell: Comments on does the death penalty save lives?. Criminology and Public Policy, 8: 845-851.
7. Bernoulli, D. 1738. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 5: 175-192.
8. Berns, G. S., Capra, C. M., Moore, S. and Noussair, C. 2007. A shocking experiment: New evidence on probability weighting and common ratio violations. Judgment and Decision Making, 2: 234-242.
9. Brown, D. W. 1978. Arrest rates and crime rates: When does a tipping effect occur?. Social Forces, 57(2): 671-682.
10. Beccaria, C. (1985). On crimes and punishments. New york, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1764).
11. Bushway, S. and Reuter, P. 2008. Economists' contribution to the study of crime and the criminal justice system. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 37: 389-451.
12. Camerer, C. and Weber, M. 1992. Recent developments in modelling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5: 325-370.
13. Casey, J. T. and Scholz, J. T. 1991. Beyond deterrence theory: Behavioral decision theory and tax compliance. Law and Society Review, 25: 821-843.
14. Casey, J. T. and Scholz, J. T. 1991. Boundary effects of vague risk information on taxpayer decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 360-394.
15. Chamlin, M. 1991. A longitudinal analysis of the arrest-crime relationship: A further examination of the tipping effect. Justice Quarterly, 8: 187-199.
16. Chilton, R. 1982. Analyzing urban crime data: Deterrence and the limitations of arrests per offense ratios. Criminology, 19: 590-607.
17. Chiu, A. and Wu, G. 2010. "Prospect theory". In Wiley Encyclopedia of operations research and management science, Edited by: Cochran, J.J. New York, NY: Wiley.
18. Cusson, M. and Pinsonneault, P. 1986. "The decision to give up crime". In The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending, Edited by: Cornish, D. B. and Clarke, R. V. 77-82. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
19. Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75: 643-669.
20. Erickson, M. L., Gibbs, J. P. and Jensen, G. F. 1977. The deterrence doctrine and the perceived certainty of legal punishments. American Sociological Review, 42: 305-317.
21. Etchart-Vincent, N. 2004. Is probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28: 217-235.
22. Fagan, J. and Piquero, A. R. 2007. Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4: 715-748.
23. Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. 1999. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 817-868.
24. Gonzalez, R. and Wu, G. 1999. On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology, 38: 129-166.
25. Grasmick, H. G. and Bursik, R. J. Jr. 1990. Conscience, significant others, and rational choice. Extending the deterrence model. Law and Society Review, 24: 837-861.
26. Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, R. J. 1990. Generalized linear models, New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
27. Huizinga, D., Esbensen, F.-A. and Weihar, A. W. 1991. Are there multiple paths to delinquency?. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82: 83-118.
28. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47: 313-327.
29. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5: 297-323.
30. Kleck, G., Sever, B., Spencer, L. and Gertz, M. 2005. The missing link in general deterrence research. Criminology, 43: 623-659.
31. Lattimore, P. K., Baker, J. R. and Witte, A. D. 1992. The influence of probability on risky choice: A parametric examination. The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 17: 377-400.
32. Laub, J. H. and Sampson, R. J. 2001. "Understanding desistance from crime". In Crime and justice: A review of research, Edited by: Tonry, M. Vol. 28, 1-69. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33. Lieberson, S. 1985. Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34. Lochner, L. 2007. Individual perceptions of the criminal justice system. American Economic Review, 97: 444-460.
35. Loughran, T. A., Piquero, A. R., Fagan, J., & Mulvey, E. P. (in press). Differential deterrence: Studying heterogeneity and changes in perceptual deterrence among serious youthful offenders. Crime & Delinquency.
36. Logan, C. H. 1972. General deterrent effects of imprisonment. Social Forces, 51: 64-73.
37. Mansfield, E. 1988. Microeconomics, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
38. Matsueda, R. L. (in press). Rational choice research in criminology: A multi-level approach. In R. Wittek, T. Snijders, & V. Nee (Eds.), Handbook of rational choice social research. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
39. Matsueda, R. L., Kreager, D. A. and Huizinga, D. 2006. Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71: 95-122.
40. McCarthy, B. 2002. New economics of sociological criminology. Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 417-42.
41. Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Fagan, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Chassin, L., and Losoya, S. H. 2004. Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2: 213-236.
42. Nagin, D. S. 1998. "Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century". In Crime and justice: A review of research, Edited by: Tonry, M. Vol. 23, 1-42. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43. Nagin, D. S. and Paternoster, R. 1993. Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review, 27: 467-496.
44. Nagin, D. S. and Pogarsky, G. 2001. Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology, 39: 404-430.
45. Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M. and Sigmund, K. 2000. Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science, 289: 1773-1775.
46. Paternoster, R. 2010. How much do we really know about criminal deterrence?. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100: 101-156.
47. Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P. and Blumstein, A. 2003. "The criminal career paradigm". In Crime and justice: A review of research, Edited by: Tonry, M. Vol. 30, 359-506. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48. Piquero, A. R., Paternoster, R., Pogarsky, G., & Loughran, T. A. (in press). Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science.
49. Pogarsky, G. 2002. Identifying deterrable offenders: Implications for deterrence research. Justice Quarterly, 19: 431-452.
50. Pogarsky, G. 2007. Deterrence and individual differences among convicted offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23: 59-74.
51. Pogarsky, G. and Piquero, A. 2003. Why may punishment encourage offending and lower perceived sanction threats? Investigating the resetting and selection explanations. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40: 95-120.
52. Pogarsky, G., Piquero, A. R. and Paternoster, R. 2004. Modeling change in perceptions about sanction threats: The neglected linkage in deterrence theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20: 343-369.
53. Pratt, T. C. and Cullen, F. T. 2005. "Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis". In Crime and justice: A review of research, Edited by: Tonry, M. Vol. 32, 373-450. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54. Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Blevins, K. R., Daigle, L. E. and Madensen, T. D. 2006. Taking stock: The status of criminological theory-Advances in criminological theory, Edited by: Cullen, F. T., Wright, J. P. and Blevins, K. R. Vol. 15, 367-395. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Publishers.
55. Robinson, W. S. 1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15: 351-357.
56. Schubert, C. A., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Losoya, S. H., Hecker, T., and Knight, G. P. 2004. Operational lessons from the pathways to desistance project. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2: 237-255.
57. Sherman, L. W. 1990. "Police crackdowns: Initial and residual deterrence". In Crime and justice: An annual review of research, Edited by: Tonry, M. and Morris, N. Vol. 12, 1-48. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58. Shover, N. 1996. Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
59. Simon, H. A. 1979. Models of thought, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
60. Stevens, S. S. 1957. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64: 153-181.
61. Thaler, R. H. 1988. Anomalies: The ultimatum game. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2: 195-206.
62. Tittle, C. R. and Paternoster, R. 2000. Social deviance and crime, Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Press.
63. Tittle, C. R. and Rowe, A. R. 1974. Certainty of arrest and crime rates: A further test of the deterrence hypothesis. Social Forces, 54: 455-462.
64. Tonry, M. 2008. "Learning from the limitations of deterrence research". In Crime and justice: A review of research, Edited by: Tonry, M. Vol. 37, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65. Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. 1947. Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd ed., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66. Weisburd, D., Einat, T. and Kowalski, M. 2008. The miracle of the cells: An experimental study of interventions to increase payment of court-ordered fines. Criminology and Public Policy, 7: 9-36.
67. Williams, K. R. and Hawkins, R. 1986. Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical overview. Law and Society Review, 20: 545-572.
68. Wright, B. R. E., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E. and Paternoster, R. 2004. Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals?: Rational choice, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41: 180-213.
69. Wright, R. T. and Decker, S. H. 1994. Burglars on the job: Streetlife and residential break-ins, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
70. Yu, J. and Liska, A. 1993. The certainty of punishment: A reference group effect and its functional form. Criminology, 31: 447-464.
71. Zimring, F. E. and Hawkins, G. J. 1968. Deterrence and marginal groups. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 5: 100-114.
72. Zimring, F. E. and Hawkins, G. J. 1973. Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.