Sources of chemical information, toxicity data and assessment of their quality

Issues in Toxicology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 98-126

  Madden, J C ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897568553     PISSN: 17577179     EISSN: 17577187     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1039/9781849734400-00098     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. V. T. Politano and A. M. Api, The Research Institute for Fragrance Materials human repeated insult patch test protocol, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2008, 52, 35.
2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 1992, Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, No. 406. Skin Sensitisation.
3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2004 Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, No. 429. Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay.
4. G. Maxwell, P. Aeby, T. Ashikaga, S. Bessou-Touya, W. Diembeck, F. Gerberick, P. Kern, M. Marrec-Fairley, J. M. Ovigne, H. Sakaguchi, K. Schroeder, M. Tailhardat, S. Teissier, and P. Winkler, Skin Sensitisation: The Colipa strategy for developing and evaluating non-animal test methods for risk assessment, Altex, 2011, 28, 50.
5. R. J. Kavlock, D. J. Dix, K. A. Houck, R. S. Judson, M. T. Martin and A. Richard, ToxCast: Developing predictive signatures for chemical toxicity AATEX (Special Issue Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences., 2007, 14, 623.
6. M. T. D. Cronin, Finding the Data to Develop and Evaluate (Q)SARs and Populate Categories for Toxicity Prediction in In Silico Toxicology: Principles and Applications, ed. M. T. D. Cronin and J. C. Madden, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge., 2010, p. 31.
7. J. A. H. Schwöbel, Y. K. Koleva, S. J. Enoch, F. Bajot, M. Hewitt, J. C. Madden, D. W. Roberts, T. W. Schultz, and M. T. D. Cronin, Measurement and estimation of electrophilic reactivity for predictive toxicology, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 2562
8. A. S. Kalgutkar, I. Gardner, R. S. Obach, C. L. Shaffer, E. Callegari, K. R. Henne, A. E. Mutlib, D. K. Dalvie, J. S. Lee, Y. Nakai, J. P. O'Donnell, J. Boer and S. P. Harriman, A comprehensive listing of bioactivation pathways of organic functional groups, Curr. Drug Metab., 2005, 6, 161.
9. D. Fourches, J. C. Barnes, N. C. Day, P. Bradley, J. Z. Reed, and A. Tropsha, Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species, Chem. Res. Tox., 2010, 23, 171.
10. S. J. Enoch, C. M. Ellison, T. W. Schultz, and M. T. D. Cronin, A review of the electrophilic reaction chemistry involved in covalent protein binding relevant to toxicity, Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 2011, 41, 783.
11. S. J. Enoch and M. T. D. Cronin, Development of new structural alerts suitable for chemical category formation for assigning covalent and noncovalent mechanisms relevant to DNA binding, Mutat. Res.-Genetic Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen, 2012, 743, 10.
12. M. Nendza, T. Aldenberg, E. Benfenati, R. Benigni, M. Cronin, S. Escher, A. Fernandez, S. Gabbert, F. Giralt, M. Hewitt, M. Hrovat, S. Jeram, D. Kroese, J. C. Madden, I. Mangelsdorf, R. Rallo, A. Roncaglioni, E. Rorije, H. Segner, B. Simon-Hettich and T. Vermeire, data quality assessment for in silico methods: a survey of approaches and needs in in silico toxicology: principles and applications, ed. M. T. D. Cronin and J. C. Madden, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2010, p. 59.
13. K. R. Przybylak, J. C. Madden, M. T. D. Cronin and M. Hewitt, Assessing toxicological data quality: basic principles existing schemes and current limitations, SAR QSAR Env. Res., 2012, 23, 435.
14. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.4: Evaluation of available information. Available at: http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13643/information- requirements-r4-en.pdf (Accessed April 2013).
15. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Series on Testing and Assessment, Number 34: Guidance document on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard assessment ENV/JM/MON., 2005, 14 Available from http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/ displaydocumentpdf/?cote5env/jm/mono(2005)14&doclanguage5en (Accessed April 2013).
16. T. H. Webb and L. Morlacci, calculation of physico-chemical and environmental fate properties, in in silico toxicology: principles and applications, ed. M. T. D. Cronin and J. C. Madden, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridg., 2010, p. 118.
17. H. -J. Klimisch, M. Andreae and U. Tillmann, A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1997, 25, 1.
18. J. C. Madden, M. Hewitt, K. Przybylak, R. J. Vandebriel and A. H. Piersma, Strategies for the optimisation of in vivo experiments in accordance with the 3Rs philosophy, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2012, 63, 140.
19. P. G. P. C. Zweers and T. G. Vermeire, Data: Needs, Availability, Sources and Evaluation in Risk Assessment of Chemicals: An Introduction (2nd Ed), ed C. J. van Leeuwen and T. G. Vermeire, Springer, The Netherland., 2007, p. 357.
20. C. Kilkenny, W. J. Browne, I. C. Cuthill, M. Emerson and D. G. Altman, Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research, PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000412.
21. X. Fu, A. Wojak, D. Neagu, M. Ridley and K. Travis, Data governance in predictive toxicology: A review, J. Cheminformatics., 2011, 3, 24.
22. K. Schneider, M. Schwarz, I. Burkholder, A. Kopp-Schneider, L. Edler, A. Kinsner-Ovaskainen, T. Hartung and S. Hoffmann S, "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data, Toxicol. Lett., 2009, 189, 138.
23. E. Tielemans, H. Marquart, J. De Cock, M. Groenewold and J. Van Hemmen, A proposal for evaluation of exposure data, Ann. Occup. Hyg, 2002, 46, 287.
24. D. A. Hobbs, M. S. Warne and S. J. Markich, Evaluation of criteria used to assess the quality of aquatic toxicity data. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage., 2005, 1, 174.
25. US EPA, Determining the adequacy of existing data, guideline for the HPV challenge program, Available at http://www.epa.gov/hpv/pubs/general/datadfin.htm (Accessed April 2013).
26. L. Yang, D. Neagu, M. T. D. Cronin, M. Hewitt, S. J. Enoch, J. C. Madden and K. Przybylak, Towards a fuzzy expert system on toxicological data quality assessment, Mol. Inf, 2013, 32, 65.
27. M. Agerstrand, M. Breitholtz and C. Ruden, Comparison of four different methods for reliability evaluation of ecotoxicity data: a case study of nonstandard test data used in environmental risk assessments of pharmaceutical substances, Environ. Sci. Eur., 2011, 23, 17.
28. P. N. Judson, P. A. Cooke, N. G. Doerrer, N. Greene, R. P. Hanzlik, C. H. Hardy, A. Hartmann, D. Hinchliffe, J. Holder, L. Muller, T. Steger-Hartmann, A. Rothfuss, M. Smith, K. Thomas, J. D. Vessey and E. Zeiger, Towards the creation of an international toxicology information centre, Toxicology, 2005, 213, 117.