The effect of chronic intracortical microstimulation on the electrode-tissue interface

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Chen, Kevin H ^a   Dammann, John F ^a   Boback, Jessica L ^a   Tenore, Francesco V ^b   Otto, Kevin J ^c   Gaunt, Robert A ^d,e   Bensmaia, Sliman J ^a,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

electrode tissue interface; impedance; intracortical microstimulation; voltage excursion

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRODES; PROSTHETICS; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

ELECTRODE-TISSUE INTERFACE; FINE MOTOR CONTROL; IMPLANTED ELECTRODES; MICROSTIMULATION; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SENSORY SUBSTITUTION; UPPER LIMB PROSTHESIS;

TISSUE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; ELECTRODE TISSUE INTERFACE; FEMALE; IMPEDANCE; INTRACORTICAL MICROSTIMULATION; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NONHUMAN; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHESUS MONKEY; STIMULATION; STIMULUS; VOCALIZATION; ANIMAL; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HAND STRENGTH; MICROELECTRODE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TIME;

ANIMALS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MICROELECTRODES; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84897496971     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/026004     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Sainburg R L et al 1995 Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception J. Neurophysiol. 73 820-35
2. Johannes M S et al 2011 An overview of the developmental process for the modular prosthetic limb Johns Hopkins Univ. Appl. Phys. Lab. Tech. Dig. 30 207-16
3. Schwartz A B et al 2006 Brain-controlled interfaces: movement restoration with neural prosthetics Neuron 52 205-20
4. Santhanam G et al 2006 A high-performance brain-computer interface Nature 442 195-8
5. Suminski A J et al 2010 Incorporating feedback from multiple sensory modalities enhances brain-machine interface control J. Neurosci. 30 16777-87
6. O'Doherty J E et al 2011 Active tactile exploration using a brain-machine-brain interface Nature 479 228-31
7. Collinger J L et al 2013 High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia Lancet 381 557-64
8. Cipriani C, D'Alonzo M and Carrozza M C 2012 A miniature vibrotactile sensory substitution device for multifingered hand prosthetics IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59 400-8
9. Lundborg G and Rosen B 2001 Sensory substitution in prosthetics Hand Clin. 17 481-8
10. Berg J A et al 2013 Behavioral demonstration of a somatosensory neuroprosthesis IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 21 500-7
11. O'Doherty J E et al 2012 Virtual active touch using randomly patterned intracortical microstimulation IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 20 85-93
12. O'Doherty J E et al 2011 Active tactile exploration using a brain-machine-brain interface Nature 479 228-31
13. Tabot G A et al 2013 Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110 18279-84
14. London B M et al 2008 Electrical stimulation of the proprioceptive cortex (area 3a) used to instruct a behaving monkey IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 16 32-36
15. Brummer S B, Robblee L S and Hambrecht F T 1983 Criteria for selecting electrodes for electrical stimulation: theoretical and practical considerations Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 405 159-71
16. Beebe X and Rose T L 1988 Charge injection limits of activated iridium oxide electrodes with 0.2 ms pulses in bicarbonate buffered saline IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 35 494-5
17. Cogan S F, Plante T D and Ehrlich J 2004 Sputtered iridium oxide films (SIROFs) for low-impedance neural stimulation and recording electrodes Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 6 4153-6
18. Cogan S F 2008 Neural stimulation and recording electrodes Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10 275-309
19. Negi S et al 2010 In vitro comparison of sputtered iridium oxide and platinum-coated neural implantable microelectrode arrays Biomed. Mater. 5 15007
20. Negi S et al 2010 Neural electrode degradation from continuous electrical stimulation: comparison of sputtered and activated iridium oxide J. Neurosci. Methods 186 8-17
21. Davis T S et al 2012 Spatial and temporal characteristics of V1 microstimulation during chronic implantation of a microelectrode array in a behaving macaque J. Neural Eng. 9 065003
22. Koivuniemi A S and Otto K J 2011 Asymmetric versus symmetric pulses for cortical microstimulation IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 19 468-76
23. McCreery D, Pikov V and Troyk P R 2010 Neuronal loss due to prolonged controlled-current stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cat cerebral cortex J. Neural Eng. 7 036005
24. Zaaimi B et al 2013 Multi-electrode stimulation in somatosensory cortex increases probability of detection J. Neural Eng. 10 056013
25. McCreery D B et al 1990 Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37 996-1001
26. Xerri C et al 1998 Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys J. Neurophysiol. 79 2119-48
27. Parker R A et al 2011 The functional consequences of chronic, physiologically effective intracortical microstimulation Prog. Brain Res. 194 145-65
28. Koivuniemi A et al 2011 Multimodal, longitudinal assessment of intracortical microstimulation Prog. Brain Res. 194 131-44
29. Vetter R J et al 2004 Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51 896-904
30. Rousche P J and Normann R A 1999 Chronic intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of cat sensory cortex using the Utah intracortical electrode array IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 7 56-68
31. Williams J C et al 2007 Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants J. Neural Eng. 4 410-23
32. Tykocinski M, Cohen L T and Cowan R S 2005 Measurement and analysis of access resistance and polarization impedance in cochlear implant recipients Otol. Neurotol. 26 948-56
33. Paasche G et al 2009 The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients Otol. Neurotol. 30 592-8
34. Wang C et al 2013 Characteristics of electrode impedance and stimulation efficacy of a chronic cortical implant using novel annulus electrodes in rat motor cortex J. Neural Eng. 10 046010
35. Kane S R et al 2011 Electrical performance of penetrating microelectrodes chronically implanted in cat cortex EMBC'11: Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society vol 60 pp 2153-60
36. Otto K J, Johnson M D and Kipke D R 2006 Voltage pulses change neural interface properties and improve unit recordings with chronically implanted microelectrodes IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53 333-40
37. Weiland J D and Anderson D J 2000 Chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47 911-8
38. Newbold C et al 2011 Electrical stimulation causes rapid changes in electrode impedance of cell-covered electrodes J. Neural Eng. 8 036029
39. Charlet de Sauvage R et al 1997 Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea Hear. Res. 110 119-34
40. Johnson M D, Otto K J and Kipke D R 2005 Repeated voltage biasing improves unit recordings by reducing resistive tissue impedances IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13 160-5
41. Sommakia S, Rickus J L and Otto K J 2009 Effects of adsorbed proteins, an antifouling agent and long-duration DC voltage pulses on the impedance of silicon-based neural microelectrodes EMBC'11: Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society pp 7139-42
42. Liu X et al 1999 Stability of the interface between neural tissue and chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 7 315-26
43. Grill W M and Mortimer J T 1994 Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue Ann. Biomed. Eng. 22 23-33
44. Logothetis N K, Kayser C and Oeltermann A 2007 In vivo measurement of cortical impedance spectrum in monkeys: implications for signal propagation Neuron 55 809-23