Electrical stimulation causes rapid changes in electrode impedance of cell-covered electrodes

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Newbold, Carrie ^a,b   Richardson, Rachael ^b,c   Millard, Rodney ^a,b,c   Seligman, Peter ^b,c,d   Cowan, Robert ^a,b   Shepherd, Robert ^b,c  

^a Hearing CRC   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c BIONIC EAR INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^d Research and Technology Labs   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS RESISTANCE; BIPHASIC; CELLULAR LAYERS; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CURRENT AMPLITUDE; CURRENT PULSE; ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS; ELECTRODE IMPEDANCE; ELECTRODE SURFACES; ELECTRODE-TISSUE INTERFACE; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; RAPID CHANGES; UNDERLYING MECHANISM;

ADHESION; CELL ADHESION; ELECTRODES; TISSUE;

CELLS;

PROTEIN;

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CELL; CELL ADHESION; CELL STRAIN; DYNAMICS; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRODE; ELECTRODE TISSUE INTERFACE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; IMPEDANCE; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CULTURE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS;

EID: 79957957631     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/036029     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Behrend M R et al 2008 Dynamic current density of the disk electrode double-layer IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55 1056-62
2. Busby P A et al 2002 Electrode impedance in adults and children using the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant Cochlear Implants Int. 3 87-103 (Pubitemid 35023452)
3. Charlet de Sauvage R et al 1997 Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea Hear. Res. 110 119-34
4. Ghosh P M et al 1993 Monitoring electropermeabilization in the plasma membrane of adherent mammalian cells Biophys. J. 64 1602-9 (Pubitemid 23185734)
5. Huang C Q et al 1999 Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: direct current measurement in vivo IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46 461-70 (Pubitemid 29159373)
6. Huang C Q et al 2001 Stimulus induced pH changes in cochlear implants: an in vitro and in vivo study Ann. Biomed. Eng. 29 791-802 (Pubitemid 33013702)
7. Keese C R et al 2004 Electrical wound-healing assay for cells in vitro Proc. National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America vol 101 pp 1554-9
8. McCreery D B 2004 Tissue reaction to electrodes: the problem of safe and effective stimulation of neural tissue Neuroprosthetics: Theory and Practice vol 2 ed K W Horch and G S Dhillon (Singapore: World Scientific) pp 592-612
9. McCreery D B 1988 Comparison of neural damage induced by electrical stimulation with Faradaic and capacitor electrodes Ann. Biomed. Eng. 16 463-81
10. McCreery D B et al 1990 Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37 996-1001
11. Miele S 2004 private communication
12. Newbold C et al 2004 An in vitro model for investigating impedance changes with cell growth and electrical stimulation: implications for cochlear implants J. Neural Eng. 1 218-27 (Pubitemid 41079656)
13. Newbold C et al 2010 Changes in biphasic electrode impedance with protein adsorption and cell growth J. Neural Eng. 7 056011
14. Seligman P M 2004 Electrode Impedance Variation with Stimulation and Time (Melbourne: Cochlear Ltd)
15. Shannon R V 1992 A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation IEEE Trans. Biomed. End. 39 424-6
16. Shepherd R K et al 2001 Protective effects of patterned electrical stimulation on the deafened auditory system Third Quarterly Progress Report, University of Melbourne, Melbourne
17. Wang Z 2009 Electromagnetic field interaction with biological tissues and cells School of electronic engineering and computer science. London p 206 PhD Thesis University of London
18. Weaver J C 2000 Electroporation of cells and tissues IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 28 24-33
19. Wegener J et al 2002 Recovery of adherent cells after in situ electroporation monitored electrically Biotechniques 33 348, 350, 352 passim
20. Weiland J D and Anderson D J 2000 Chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47 911-8