Dynamic energy budgets in population ecotoxicology: Applications and outlook

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 280, Issue , 2014, Pages 140-147

  Jager, Tjalling ^a   Barsi, Alpar ^b   Hamda, Natnael T ^c   Martin, Benjamin T ^d   Zimmer, Elke I ^a   Ducrot, Virginie ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

^c JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^d HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dynamic energy budget; Ecotoxicology; Population models; Review; TKTD models

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; EXTRAPOLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REVIEWS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

DYNAMIC ENERGY BUDGETS; ECO-TOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT; EXPERIMENTAL TESTING; INDIVIDUAL MODELING; POPULATION MODEL; POPULATION MODELLING; STRUCTURED POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ECOLOGY;

ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENERGY BUDGET; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION MODELING; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84897399229     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.06.024     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alda Álvarez O., Jager T., Kooijman S.A.L.M., Kammenga J.E. Responses to stress of Caenorhabditis elegans populations with different reproductive strategies. Functional Ecology 2005, 19:656-664.
2. Alda Álvarez O., Jager T., Marco Redondo E., Kammenga J.E. Physiological modes of action of toxic chemicals in the nematode Acrobeloides nanus. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2006, 25:3230-3237.
3. Ashauer R., Escher B.I. Advantages of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling in aquatic ecotoxicology and risk assessment. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 2010, 12:2056-2061.
4. Beaudouin R., Dias V., Bonzom J.M., Péry A. Individual-based model of Chironomus riparius population dynamics over several generations to explore adaptation following exposure to uranium-spiked sediments. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21:1225-1239.
5. Bernardo J. Maternal effects in animal ecology. American Zoologist 1996, 36:83-105.
6. Billoir E., Péry A.R.R., Charles S. Integrating the lethal and sublethal effects of toxic compounds into the population dynamics of Daphnia magna: a combination of the DEBtox and matrix population models. Ecological Modelling 2007, 203:204-214.
7. Billoir E., Delignette-Muller M.L., Péry A.R.R., Geffard O., Charles S. Statistical cautions when estimating DEBtox parameters. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2008, 254:55-64.
8. Billoir E., da Silva Ferrão-Filho A., Delignette-Muller M.L., Charles S. DEBtox theory and matrix population models as helpful tools in understanding the interaction between toxic cyanobacteria and zooplankton. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2009, 258:380-388.
9. Biron P.A., Massarin S., Alonzo F., Garcia-Sanchez L., Charles S., Billoir E. Population-level modeling to account for multigenerational effects of uranium in Daphnia magna. Environmental Science & Technology 2012, 46:1136-1143.
10. Bodiguel X., Maury O., Mellon-Duval C., Roupsard F., Le Guellec A.M., Loizeau V. A dynamic and mechanistic model of PCB bioaccumulation in the European hake (Merluccius merluccius). Journal of Sea Research 2009, 62:124-134.
11. De Roos A.M. Demographic analysis of continuous-time life-history models. Ecology Letters 2008, 11:1-15.
12. Ducrot V., Péry A.R.R., Mons R., Quéau H., Charles S., Garric J. Dynamic energy budget as a basis to model population-level effects of zinc-spiked sediments in the gastropod Valvata piscinalis. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2007, 26:1774-1783.
13. Ducrot V., Billoir E., Péry A.R.R., Garric J., Charles S. From individual to population level effects of toxicants in the tubicifid Branchiura sowerbyi using threshold effect models in a Bayesian framework. Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 44:3566-3571.
14. Forbes V.E., Calow P. Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population-level effects in ecotoxicology?. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 1999, 18:1544-1556.
15. ISO Water Quality - Guidance on Statistical Interpretation of Ecotoxicity Data 2006, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneve, Switzerland.
16. Jager T. Making sense of chemical stress. Applications of Dynamic Energy Budget Theory in Ecotoxicology and Stress Ecology 2012, (Version 9 April 2012). http://www.debtox.info/book.php.
17. Jager T. All individuals are not created equal; accounting for interindividual variation in fitting life-history responses to toxicants. Environmental Science & Technology 2013, 47:1664-1669.
18. Jager T., Klok C. Extrapolating toxic effects on individuals to the population level: the role of dynamic energy budgets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2010, 365:3531-3540.
19. Jager T., Kooijman S.A.L.M. A biology-based approach for quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) in ecotoxicity. Ecotoxicology 2009, 18:187-196.
20. Jager T., Zimmer E.I. Simplified dynamic energy budget model for analysing ecotoxicity data. Ecological Modelling 2012, 225:74-81.
21. Jager T., Crommentuijn T., Van Gestel C.A.M., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Simultaneous modeling of multiple endpoints in life-cycle toxicity tests. Environmental Science & Technology 2004, 38:2894-2900.
22. Jager T., Heugens E.H.W., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Making sense of ecotoxicological test results: towards application of process-based models. Ecotoxicology 2006, 15:305-314.
23. Jager T., Vandenbrouck T., Baas J., De Coen W.M., Kooijman S.A.L.M. A biology-based approach for mixture toxicity of multiple endpoints over the life cycle. Ecotoxicology 2010, 19:351-361.
24. Jager T., Martin B.T., Zimmer E.I. DEBkiss or the quest for the simplest generic model of animal life history. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2013, 328:9-18.
25. Klanjscek T., Caswell H., Neubert M.G., Nisbet R.M. Integrating dynamic energy budgets into matrix population models. Ecological Modelling 2006, 196:407-420.
26. Klok C., De Roos A.M. Population level consequences of toxicological influences on individual growth and reproduction in Lumbricus rubellus (Lumbricidae, Oligochaeta). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 1996, 33:118-127.
27. Klok C., Holmstrup M., Damgaard C. Extending a combined dynamic energy budget matrix population model with a Bayesian approach to assess variation in the intrinsic rate of population increase. An example in the earthworm Dendrobaena octaedra. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2007, 26:2383-2388.
28. Kooijman S.A.L.M. Quantitative aspects of metabolic organization: a discussion of concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 2001, 356:331-349.
29. Kooijman S.A.L.M. Dynamic Energy Budget Theory for Metabolic Organisation 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
30. Kooijman S.A.L.M., Bedaux J.J.M. Analysis of toxicity tests on Daphnia survival and reproduction. Water Research 1996, 30:1711-1723.
31. Kooijman S.A.L.M., Metz J.A.J. On the dynamics of chemically stressed populations: the deduction of population consequences from effects on individuals. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 1984, 8:254-274.
32. Kooijman S.A.L.M., Van der Hoeven N., Van der Werf D.C. Population consequences of a physiological model for individuals. Functional Ecology 1989, 3:325-336.
33. Kooijman S.A.L.M., Sousa T., Pecquerie L., Van der Meer J., Jager T. From food-dependent statistics to metabolic parameters, a practical guide to the use of dynamic energy budget theory. Biological Reviews 2008, 83:533-552.
34. Lika K., Kooijman S.A.L.M. The comparative topology of energy allocation in budget models. Journal of Sea Research 2011, 66:381-391.
35. Lika K., Kearney M.R., Freitas V., Van der Veer H.W., Van der Meer J., Wijsman J.W.M., Pecquerie L., Kooijman S.A.L.M. The covariation method" for estimating the parameters of the standard dynamic energy budget model I: philosophy and approach. Journal of Sea Research 2011, 66:270-277.
36. Martin B.T., Zimmer E.I., Grimm V., Jager T. Dynamic energy budget theory meets individual-based modelling: a generic and accessible implementation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2012, 3:445-449.
37. Martin B.T., Jager T., Nisbet R.M., Preuss T.G., Grimm V. Predicting population dynamics from the properties of individuals: a cross-level test of dynamic energy budget theory. American Naturalist 2013, 181:506-519.
38. Martin B.T., Jager T., Nisbet R.M., Preuss T.G., Hammers-Wirtz M., Grimm V. Extrapolating ecotoxicological effects from individuals to populations: a generic approach based on dynamic energy budget theory and individual-based modeling. Ecotoxicology 2013, 22:574-583.
39. Muller E.B., Nisbet R.M., Berkley H.A. Sublethal toxicant effects with dynamic energy budget theory: model formulation. Ecotoxicology 2010, 19:48-60.
40. Nisbet R.M., Muller E.B., Lika K., Kooijman S.A.L.M. From molecules to ecosystems through dynamic energy budget models. Journal of Animal Ecology 2000, 69:913-926.
41. OECD Current Approaches in the Statistical Analysis of Ecotoxicity Data: A Guidance to Application, Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 54 2006, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris, France.
42. Péry A.R.R., Mons R., Flammarion P., Lagadic L., Garric J. A modeling approach to link food availability, growth, emergence and reproduction for the midge Chironomus riparius. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2002, 21:2507-2513.
43. Pieters B.J., Jager T., Kraak M.H.S., Admiraal W. Modeling responses of Daphnia magna to pesticide pulse exposure under varying food conditions: intrinsic versus apparent sensitivity. Ecotoxicology 2006, 15:601-608.
44. Sibly R.M., Grimm V., Martin B.T., Johnston A.S.A., Kulakowska K., Topping C.J., Calow P., Nabe-Nielsen J., Thorbek P., DeAngelis D.L. Representing the acquisition and use of energy by individuals in agent-based models of animal populations. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2013, 4:151-161.
45. Sousa T., Domingos T., Poggiale J.C., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Dynamic energy budget theory restores coherence in biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2010, 365:3413-3428.
46. Van der Meer J. Metabolic theories in ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2006, 21:136-140.
47. Van Haren R.J.F., Schepers H.E., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Dynamic energy budgets affect kinetics of xenobiotics in the marine mussel Mytilus edulis. Chemosphere 1994, 29:163-189.
48. Zimmer E.I., Jager T., Ducrot V., Lagadic L., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Juvenile food limitation in standardized tests: a warning to ecotoxicologists. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21:2195-2204.