Simplified Dynamic Energy Budget model for analysing ecotoxicity data

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 225, Issue , 2012, Pages 74-81

  Jager, Tjalling ^a   Zimmer, Elke I ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

DEBtox; Dose response analysis; Dynamic Energy Budgets; Parameter estimation; TKTD modelling

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZES; DAPHNIA MAGNA; DEBTOX; DOSE-RESPONSE ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC ENERGY BUDGETS; ECOTOXICITY DATA; ECOTOXICOLOGICAL TESTS; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FLUORANTHENE; LIFE HISTORY; MODEL CURVE; MODEL PREDICTION; ON DYNAMICS; PARAMETER ESTIMATE; STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK; TIME POINTS; TKTD MODELLING; TOXICITY TEST;

BUDGET CONTROL; CURVE FITTING; INVESTMENTS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; TOXICITY;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS;

BODY SIZE; CRUSTACEAN; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENERGY BUDGET; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PARAMETERIZATION; TOXICITY TEST;

DAPHNIA; DAPHNIA MAGNA;

EID: 83455195679     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alda álvarez O., Jager T., Marco Redondo E., Kammenga J.E. Physiological modes of action of toxic chemicals in the nematode Acrobeloides nanus. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2006, 25:3230-3237.
2. Ashauer R., Caravatti I., Hintermeister A., Escher B.I. Bioaccumulation kinetics of organic xenobiotic pollutants in the freshwater invertebrate Gammarus pulex modeled with prediction intervals. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2010, 29(7):1625-1636.
3. Barata C., Baird D.J. Determining the ecotoxicological mode of action of chemicals from measurements made on individuals: results from instar-based tests with Daphnia magna Straus. Aquatic Toxicology 2000, 48(2-3):195-209.
4. Bedaux J.J.M., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Statistical analysis of bioassays based on hazard modelling. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 1994, 1:303-314.
5. Billoir E., Delignette-Muller M.L., Péry A.R.R., Charles S. A Bayesian approach to analyzing ecotoxicological data. Environmental Science & Technology 2008, 42:8978-8984.
6. Billoir E., Delignette-Muller M.L., Péry A.R.R., Geffard O., Charles S. Statistical cautions when estimating DEBtox parameters. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2008, 254(1):55-64.
7. Jager T., Albert C., Preuss T.G., Ashauer R. General unified threshold model of survival - a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic framework for ecotoxicology. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45:2529-2540.
8. Jager T., Crommentuijn T., Van Gestel C.A.M., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Simultaneous modeling of multiple endpoints in life-cycle toxicity tests. Environmental Science & Technology 2004, 38:2894-2900.
9. Jager T., Klok C. Extrapolating toxic effects on individuals to the population level: the role of dynamic energy budgets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 2010, 365:3531-3540.
10. Jager T., Vandenbrouck T., Baas J., De Coen W.M., Kooijman S.A.L.M. A biology-based approach for mixture toxicity of multiple endpoints over the life cycle. Ecotoxicology 2010, 19:351-361.
11. Klanjscek T., Caswell H., Neubert M.G., Nisbet R.M. Integrating dynamic energy budgets into matrix population models. Ecological Modelling 2006, 196(3-4):407-420.
12. Klok C., De Roos A.M. Population level consequences of toxicological influences on individual growth and reproduction in Lumbricus rubellus (Lumbricidae, Oligochaeta). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 1996, 33:118-127.
13. Kooijman S.A.L.M. Dynamic Energy Budget Theory for Metabolic Organisation 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 3rd ed.
14. Kooijman S.A.L.M., Bedaux J.J.M. Analysis of toxicity tests on fish growth. Water Research 1996, 30(7):1633-1644.
15. Kooijman S.A.L.M., Bedaux J.J.M. Analysis of toxicity tests on Daphnia survival and reproduction. Water Research 1996, 30(7):1711-1723.
16. Kooijman S.A.L.M., Metz J.A.J. On the dynamics of chemically stressed populations: the deduction of population consequences from effects on individuals. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 1984, 8:254-274.
17. Kooijman S.A.L.M., Sousa T., Pecquerie L., Van der Meer J., Jager T. From food-dependent statistics to metabolic parameters, a practical guide to the use of dynamic energy budget theory. Biological Reviews 2008, 83:533-552.
18. Muller E.B., Nisbet R.M., Berkley H.A. Sublethal toxicant effects with dynamic energy budget theory: model formulation. Ecotoxicology 2010, 19(1):48-60.
19. Neal R.M. Slice sampling. Annals of Statistics 2003, 31(3):705-741.
20. Nisbet R.M., Muller E.B., Lika K., Kooijman S.A.L.M. From molecules to ecosystems through dynamic energy budget models. Journal of Animal Ecology 2000, 69:913-926.
21. Nogueira A.J.A., Baird D.J., Soares A.M.V.M. Testing physiologically-based resource allocation rules in laboratory experiments with Daphnia magna Straus. Annales De Limnologie-International Journal of Limnology 2004, 40(4):257-267.
22. Pawitan Y. In All Likelihood: Statistical Modelling and Inference using Likelihood 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
23. Pieters B.J., Jager T., Kraak M.H.S., Admiraal W. Modeling responses of Daphnia magna to pesticide pulse exposure under varying food conditions: intrinsic versus apparent sensitivity. Ecotoxicology 2006, 15:601-608.
24. Swain S., Wren J.F., Stuerzenbaum S.R., Kille P., Morgan A.J., Jager T., Jonker M.J., Hankard P.K., Svendsen C., Owen J., Hedley B.A., Blaxter M., Spurgeon D.J. Linking toxicant physiological mode of action with induced gene expression changes in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Systems Biology 2010, 4:32.