Proactive effects of memory in young and older adults: The role of change recollection

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 950-964

  Wahlheim, Christopher N ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Change detection; Change recollection; Metacognition; Proactive interference; Reminding

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; AGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RECALL; TIME FACTOR; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY DISORDERS; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897360857     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0411-4     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anderson, M. C., & McCulloch, K. C. (1999). Integration as a general boundary condition on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 25, 608–629. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.608
2. Balota, D. A., Dolan, P. O., & Duchek, J. M. (2000). Memory changes in healthy older adults. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 395–409). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchinson, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B.,.. Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi:10.3758/BF03193014
4. Barnes, J. M., & Underwood, B. J. (1959). “Fate” of first-list associations in transfer theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 97–105. doi:10.1037/h0047507
5. Campbell, K. L., Hasher, L., & Thomas, R. C. (2010). Hyper-binding: A unique age effect. Psychological Science, 21, 399–405. doi:10.1177/0956797609359910
6. Craik, F. I. M., & Jennings, J. M. (1992). Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 51–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Grady, C. L., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Changes in memory processing with age. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10, 224–231.
9. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9
10. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2006). Aging and long term memory: Deficits are not inevitable. In E. Bialystok & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 162–177). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11. Hay, J. F., & Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Separating habit and recollection in young and older adults: Effects of elaborative processing and distinctiveness. Psychology and Aging, 14, 122–134. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.14.1.122
12. Healey, M. K., Hasher, L., & Campbell, K. L. (2013). The role of suppression in resolving interference: Evidence for an age-related deficit. Psychology and Aging, 28, 721–728. doi:10.1037/a0033003
13. Hintzman, D. L. (2010). How does repetition affect memory? Evidence from judgments of recency. Memory & Cognition, 38, 102–115. doi:10.3758/MC.38.1.102
14. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 25, 3–22. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.3
15. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306–340. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306
16. Jacoby, L. L., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2013). On the importance of looking back: The role of recursive remindings in recency judgments and cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 41, 625–637. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0298-5
17. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honor of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Jacoby, L. L., Debner, J. A., & Hay, J. F. (2001). Proactive interference, accessibility bias, and process dissociations: Valid subject reports of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 27, 686–700. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.686
19. Jacoby, L. L., Bishara, A. J., Hessels, S., & Toth, J. P. (2005a). Aging, subjective experience, and cognitive control: Dramatic false remembering by older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 131–148. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.131
20. Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Daniels, K. A., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005b). Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: Depth of retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 852–857. doi:10.3758/BF03196776
21. Jacoby, L. L., Wahlheim, C. N., Rhodes, M. G., Daniels, K. A., & Rogers, C. S. (2010). Learning to diminish the effects of proactive interference: Reducing false memory for young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 38, 820–829. doi:10.3758/MC.38.6.820
22. Jacoby, L. L., Wahlheim, C. N., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2013). The role of detection and recollection of change in list discrimination. Memory & Cognition, 41, 638–649. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0313-x
23. Kane, M. J. (2002). Interference. In G. Maddox (Ed.), Encyclopedia of aging (pp. 514–516). New York, NY: Springer.
24. Kausler, D. H. (1994). Learning and memory in normal aging. New York, NY: Academic Press.
25. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
26. Light, L. L. (1991). Memory and aging: Four hypotheses in search of data. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 333–376. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002001
27. Lindenberger, U., & Ghisletta, P. (2009). Cognitive and sensory declines in old age: Gauging the evidence for a common cause. Psychology and Aging, 24, 1–16. doi:10.1037/a0014986
28. Logan, J. M., & Balota, D. A. (2003). Conscious and unconscious lexical retrieval blocking in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 18, 537–550.
29. Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208. doi:10.3758/BF03204766
30. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 19, 851–861. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.851
31. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 26, 1170–1187. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1170
32. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved from http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
33. Postman, L. (1964). Studies of learning to learn: II. Changes in transfer as a function of practice. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 437–447.
34. Putnam, A. L., Wahlheim, C. N., & Jacoby, L. L. (2014). Memory for flip-flopping: Detection and recollection of political contradictions. Manuscripts under revision.
35. Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Mental models and the fan effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 17, 940–953. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.5.940
36. Radvansky, G. A., Zacks, R. T., & Hasher, L. (2005). Age and inhibition: The retrieval of situation models. Journals of Gerontology, 60B, P276–P278.
37. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
38. Shipley, W. C. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
39. Tzeng, O. J., & Cotton, B. (1980). A study-phase retrieval model of temporal coding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 705–716. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.6.705
40. Wahlheim, C. N. (2011). Predicting memory performance under conditions of proactive interference: Immediate and delayed judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition, 39, 827–838. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0065-9
41. Wahlheim, C. N., & Jacoby, L. L. (2011). Experience with proactive interference diminishes its effects: Mechanisms of change. Memory & Cognition, 39, 185–195. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0017-4
42. Wahlheim, C. N., & Jacoby, L. L. (2013). Remembering change: The critical role of recursive remindings in proactive effects of memory. Memory & Cognition, 41, 1–15. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0246-9
43. Wilson, M. (1988). MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 6–10. doi:10.3758/BF03202594
44. Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M. (1983). Paired-associate learning in institutionalized and noninstitutionalized old people: An analysis of interference and context effects. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 455–464.
45. Winograd, E., & Soloway, R. M. (1985). Reminding as a basis for temporal judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 11, 262–271. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.11.2.262