Predicting memory performance under conditions of proactive interference: Immediate and delayed judgments of learning

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 827-838

  Wahlheim, Christopher N ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Delayed JOLs; Judgments of learning; Metacognition; Proactive interference

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS;

EID: 80055029656     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-010-0065-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Memory (2nd ed., pp. 237-313). San Diego: Academic Press.
2. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The english lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39,445-459.
3. Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
4. Diaz, M., & Benjamin, A. S. (2011). The effects of proactive interference (PI) and release from PI on judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0010-y.
5. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
6. Jacoby, L. L., Wahlheim, C. N., Rhodes, M. G., Daniels, K. A., & Rogers, C. S. (2010). Learning to diminish the effects of proactive interference: Reducing false memory for young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 38, 819-828.
7. Kimball, D. R., & Metcalfe, J. (2003). Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 918-929.
8. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know what we know? The accessibility model of feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
9. Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 311-333.
10. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
11. Koriat, A., Ma'ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationship between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause and effect relationship between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 36-69.
12. Krinsky, R., & Nelson, T. O. (1985). The feeling of knowing for different types of retrieval failure. Acta Psychologica, 58, 141-158.
13. Maki, R. H. (1999). The roles of competition, target accessibility, and cue familiarity in metamemory for words pairs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1011-1023.
14. Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008). Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1084-1097.
15. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 851-861.
16. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available at http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
17. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
18. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect." Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
19. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1992). How shall we explain the delayed-judgments-of-learning effect? Psychological Science, 3, 317-318.
20. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, (vol. 26, pp. 125-173). New York: Academic Press.
21. Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204-221.
22. Spellman, B. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). People's judgments of learning are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall when retrieval practice mediates both tasks. Psychological Science, 3, 315-316.
23. Wahlheim, C. N., & Jacoby, L. L. (2011). Experience with proactive interference diminishes its effects: Mechanisms of change. Memory & Cognition. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0017-4.