How important is intraspecific genetic admixture to the success of colonising populations?

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 233-242

  Rius, Marc ^a   Darling, John A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; FITNESS; GENETIC STRUCTURE; RANGE EXPANSION; SELECTION; GENOTYPE; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; LOCAL ADAPTATION;

ANIMAL DISPERSAL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROSIS; POPULATION GENETICS; TRENDS;

ANIMAL DISTRIBUTION; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; HYBRID VIGOR; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84897065277     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.003     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Bell M.A., Travis M.P. Hybridization, transgressive segregation, genetic covariation, and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 20:358-361.
2. Lawson Handley L.J., et al. Ecological genetics of invasive alien species. BioControl 2011, 56:409-428.
3. Roman J., Darling J.A. Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:454-464.
4. Dlugosch K.M., Parker I.M. Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:431-449.
5. Facon B., et al. Hybridization and invasiveness in the freshwater snail Melanoides tuberculata: hybrid vigour is more important than increase in genetic variance. J. Evol. Biol. 2005, 18:524-535.
6. Verhoeven K.J.F., et al. Population admixture, biological invasions and the balance between local adaptation and inbreeding depression. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 278:2-8.
7. Rieseberg L.H., et al. Hybridization and the colonization of novel habitats by annual sunflowers. Genetica 2007, 129:149-165.
8. Ellstrand N.C., Schierenbeck K.A. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97:7043-7050.
9. Arnold M.L., Hodges S.A. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995, 10:67-71.
10. Seehausen O. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:198-207.
11. Keller S.R., et al. Bayesian inference of a complex invasion history revealed by nuclear and chloroplast genetic diversity in the colonizing plant, Silene latifolia. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:4721-4734.
12. Kolbe J.J., et al. Admixture determines genetic diversity and population differentiation in the biological invasion of a lizard species. Biol. Lett. 2008, 4:434-437.
13. Chapple D.G., et al. Divergent introduction histories among invasive populations of the delicate skink (Lampropholis delicata): has the importance of genetic admixture in the success of biological invasions been overemphasized?. Divers. Distrib. 2013, 19:134-146.
14. Dutech C., et al. The chestnut blight fungus world tour: successive introduction events from diverse origins in an invasive plant fungal pathogen. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:3931-3946.
15. Ordóñez V., et al. Mixed but not admixed: a spatial analysis of genetic variation of an invasive ascidian on natural and artificial substrates. Mar. Biol. 2013, 160:1645-1660.
16. Lenormand T. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:183-189.
17. Lockwood J.L., et al. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:223-228.
18. Simberloff D. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40:81-102.
19. Lippman Z.B., Zamir D. Heterosis: revisiting the magic. Trends Genet. 2006, 23:60-66.
20. Keller L.F., Waller D.M. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:230-241.
21. Fitzpatrick B.M., Shaffer H.B. Hybrid vigor between native and introduced salamanders raises new challenges for conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:15793-15798.
22. Lavergne S., Molofsky J. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:3883-3888.
23. Johansen-Morris A.D., Latta R.G. Fitness consequences of hybridization between ecotypes of Avena barbata: hybrid breakdown, hybrid vigor, and transgressive segregation. Evolution 2006, 60:1585-1595.
24. Drake J.M. Heterosis, the catapult effect and establishment success of a colonizing bird. Biol. Lett. 2006, 2:304-307.
25. Sakaguchi S., et al. Lineage admixture during postglacial range expansion is responsible for the increased gene diversity of Kalopanax septemlobus in a recently colonised territory. Heredity 2011, 107:338-348.
26. Praebel K., et al. Invasion genetics of vendace (Coregonus albula (L.)) in the Inari-Pasvik watercourse: revealing the origin and expansion pattern of a rapid colonization event. Ecol. Evol. 2013, 3:1400-1412.
27. Rieseberg L.H., et al. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 1999, 83:363-372.
28. Bridle J.R., Vines T.H. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:140-147.
29. Hufbauer R.A., et al. Role of propagule pressure in colonization success: disentangling the relative importance of demographic, genetic and habitat effects. J. Evol. Biol. 2013, 26:1691-1699.
30. Ahlroth P., et al. Founder population size and number of source populations enhance colonization success in waterstriders. Oecologia 2003, 137:617-620.
31. Keller S.R., Taylor D.R. Genomic admixture increases fitness during a biological invasion. J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23:1720-1731.
32. Lynch M. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 1991, 45:622-629.
33. Angert A.L., et al. Using experimental evolution to investigate geographic range limits in monkeyflowers. Evolution 2008, 62:2660-2675.
34. Holt R. On the evolutionary ecology of species' ranges. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2003, 5:159-178.
35. Hardie D.C., Hutchings J.A. Evolutionary ecology at the extremes of species' ranges. Environ. Rev. 2010, 18:1-20.
36. Sexton J.P., et al. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40:415-436.
37. Blair A.C., et al. Hybridization and invasion: an experimental test with diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa Lam.). Evol. Appl. 2012, 5:17-28.
38. Rius M., et al. Tracking invasion histories in the sea: facing complex scenarios using multilocus data. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e35815.
39. Rosenthal D.M., et al. Evidence for multiple sources of invasion and intraspecific hybridization in Brachypodium sylvaticum (Hudson) Beauv. in North America. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:4657-4669.
40. Kolbe J.J., et al. Multiple sources, admixture, and genetic variation in introduced Anolis lizard populations. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:1612-1625.
41. Carlton J.T. Patterns of transoceanic marine biological invasions in the Pacific Ocean. Bull. Mar. Sci. 1987, 41:452-465.
42. Suarez A.V., et al. The role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of nonnative ants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:17032-17035.
43. Kajita Y., et al. A population genetic signature of human releases in an invasive ladybeetle. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:5473-5483.
44. Duchen P., et al. Demographic inference reveals African and European admixture in the North American Drosophila melanogaster population. Genetics 2013, 193:291-301.
45. Geller J.B., et al. Genetic perspectives on marine biological invasions. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2010, 2:367-393.
46. Chun Y.J., et al. Gene flow and population admixture as the primary post-invasion processes in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) populations in France. New Phytol. 2010, 185:1100-1107.
47. Kolbe J.J., et al. Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 2004, 431:177-181.
48. Gunn B.F., et al. Independent origins of cultivated coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) in the old world tropics. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e21143.
49. Zhan A., et al. Complex genetic patterns in closely related colonizing invasive species. Ecol. Evol. 2012, 2:1331-1346.
50. Pineda M.C., et al. The whereabouts of an ancient wanderer: global phylogeography of the solitary ascidian Styela plicata. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e25495.
51. Lombaert E., et al. Bridgehead effect in the worldwide invasion of the biocontrol harlequin ladybird. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e9743.
52. Goldstien S.J., et al. Global phylogeography of the widely introduced north west Pacific ascidian Styela clava. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e16755.
53. Nolte A.W., et al. An invasive lineage of sculpins, Cottus sp. (Pisces, Teleostei) in the Rhine with new habitat adaptations has originated from hybridization between old phylogeographic groups. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2005, 272:2379-2387.
54. Chun Y.J., et al. Adaptive divergence for a fitness-related trait among invasive Ambrosia artemisiifolia populations in France. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:1378-1388.
55. Turgeon J., et al. Experimental evidence for the phenotypic impact of admixture between wild and biocontrol Asian ladybird (Harmonia axyridis) involved in the European invasion. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24:1044-1052.
56. Facon B., et al. High genetic variance in life-history strategies within invasive populations by way of multiple introductions. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:363-367.
57. Kolbe J.J., et al. Differential admixture shapes morphological variation among invasive populations of the lizard Anolis sagrei. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:1579-1591.
58. Tepolt C.K., et al. European green crabs (Carcinus maenas) in the northeastern Pacific: genetic evidence for high population connectivity and current-mediated expansion from a single introduced source population. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15:997-1009.
59. Darling J.A., et al. Genetic patterns across multiple introductions of the globally invasive crab genus Carcinus. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:4992-5007.
60. Blakeslee A.M.H., et al. A hitchhiker's guide to the Maritimes: anthropogenic transport facilitates long-distance dispersal of an invasive crab to Newfoundland. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 16:879-891.
61. Consuegra S., et al. Winning the invasion roulette: escapes from fish farms increase admixture and facilitate establishment of non-native rainbow trout. Evol. Appl. 2011, 4:660-671.
62. Rius M., Shenkar N. Ascidian introductions through the Suez Canal: the case study of an Indo-Pacific species. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2012, 64:2060-2068.
63. Lockwood J.L., et al. The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15:904-910.
64. Zenni R.D., Simberloff D. Number of source populations as a potential driver of pine invasions in Brazil. Biol. Invasions 2013, 15:1623-1639.
65. Zenni R.D., Nuñez M.A. The elephant in the room: the role of failed invasions in understanding invasion biology. Oikos 2013, 122:801-815.
66. Ricciardi A. Are modern biological invasions an unprecedented form of global change?. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:329-336.
67. Krehenwinkel H., Tautz D. Northern range expansion of European populations of the wasp spider Argiope bruennichi is associated with global warming-correlated genetic admixture and population-specific temperature adaptations. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22:2232-2248.
68. Knopp T., Merila J. The postglacial recolonization of Northern Europe by Rana arvalis as revealed by microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analyses. Heredity 2009, 102:174-181.
69. Seifertová M., et al. Multiple Pleistocene refugia and post-glacial colonization in the European chub (Squalius cephalus) revealed by combined use of nuclear and mitochondrial markers. J. Biogeogr. 2012, 39:1024-1040.
70. Schmitt T., Müller P. Limited hybridization along a large contact zone between two genetic lineages of the butterfly Erebia medusa (Satyrinae, Lepidoptera) in Central Europe. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2007, 45:39-46.
71. Vila M., et al. The importance of time scale and multiple refugia: incipient speciation and admixture of lineages in the butterfly Erebia triaria (Nymphalidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol 2005, 36:249-260.
72. Huertz M., et al. Nuclear microsatellites reveal contrasting patterns of genetic structure between western and southeastern European populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Evolution 2004, 58:976-988.
73. Petit R.J., et al. Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 2003, 300:1563-1565.
74. Taylor D.R., Keller S.R. Historical range expansion determines the phylogenetic diversity introduced during contemporary species invasion. Evolution 2007, 61:334-345.
75. Tishkoff S.A., et al. The genetic structure and history of Africans and African Americans. Science 2009, 324:1035-1044.
76. Montana G., Pritchard J.K. Statistical tests for admixture mapping with case-control and cases-only data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 75:771-789.
77. Schlebusch C.M., et al. Genomic variation in seven Khoe-San groups reveals adaptation and complex African history. Science 2012, 338:374-379.
78. Emerson B.C., Gillespie R.G. Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:619-630.
79. Wolkovich E.M., Cleland E.E. The phenology of plant invasions: a community ecology perspective. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 9:287-294.
80. Jones E.I., Gomulkiewicz R. Biotic interactions, rapid evolution, and the establishment of introduced species. Am. Nat. 2012, 179:E28-E36.
81. Choisy M., et al. Estimating admixture proportions with microsatellites: comparison of methods based on simulated data. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:955-968.
82. François O., et al. Principal component analysis under population genetic models of range expansion and admixture. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:1257-1268.
83. Simon-Bouhet B., et al. Multiple introductions promote range expansion of the mollusc Cyclope neritea (Nassariidae) in France: evidence from mitochondrial sequence data. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:1699-1711.
84. Roman J. Diluting the founder effect: cryptic invasions expand a marine invader's range. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:2453-2459.
85. Slatkin M., Hudson R.R. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics 1991, 129:555-562.
86. Navascués M., et al. Characterization of demographic expansions from pairwise comparisons of linked microsatellite haplotypes. Genetics 2009, 181:1013-1019.
87. Gillis N.K., et al. Higher genetic diversity in introduced than in native populations of the mussel Mytella charruana: evidence of population admixture at introduction sites. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15:784-795.
88. Rollins L.A., et al. Mitochondrial DNA offers unique insights into invasion history of the common starling. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:2307-2317.
89. Rand D.M. Neutrality tests of molecular markers and the connection between DNA polymorphism, demography, and conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 1996, 10:665-671.
90. Corander J., et al. BAPS 2: enhanced possibilities for the analysis of genetic population structure. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:2363-2369.
91. Pritchard J.K., et al. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155:945-959.
92. Ma J., Amos C.I. Principal components analysis of population admixture. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e40115.
93. Jombart T., et al. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 2010, 11:94.
94. Cornuet J-M., et al. Inference on population history and model checking using DNA sequence and microsatellite data with the software DIYABC (v1.0). BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:401.
95. Price A.L., et al. Sensitive detection of chromosomal segments of distinct ancestry in admixed populations. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000519.
96. Nielsen E.E., et al. HYBRIDLAB (version 1.0): a program for generating simulated hybrids from population samples. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6:971-973.
97. Ray N., et al. SPLATCHE2: a spatially explicit simulation framework for complex demography, genetic admixture and recombination. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:2993-2994.
98. Bryc K., et al. Genome-wide patterns of population structure and admixture in West Africans and African Americans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:786-791.
99. De Carvalho D., et al. Admixture facilitates adaptation from standing variation in the European aspen (Populus tremula L.), a widespread forest tree. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:1638-1650.