Role of propagule pressure in colonization success: Disentangling the relative importance of demographic, genetic and habitat effects

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1691-1699

  Hufbauer, R A ^a,b   Rutschmann, A ^b   Serrate, B ^a   Vermeil de Conchard, H ^c   Facon, B ^c  

^a CENTRE DE BIOLOGIE ET DE GESTION DES POPULATIONS   (France)

^b Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^c Moulis   (France)

Author keywords

Biological control; Colonization; Conservation; Founder; Genetic by environment interactions; Heterosis; Inbreeding; Invasion; Reintroduction

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COLONIZATION; DEMOGRAPHY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HABITAT TYPE; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; PROPAGULE; REINTRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; STOCHASTICITY;

ALEYRODIDAE; BEMISIA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL; COLONIZATION; CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; FOUNDER; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENETIC BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS; GENETICS; HEMIPTERA; HETEROSIS; INBREEDING; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVASION; MALE; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REINTRODUCTION;

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; COLONIZATION; CONSERVATION; FOUNDER; GENETIC BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS; HETEROSIS; INBREEDING; INVASION; REINTRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; FOUNDER EFFECT; HEMIPTERA; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MALE; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 84881028014     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12167     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agashe, D., Falk, J.J. & Bolnick, D.I. 2011. Effects of founding genetic variation on adaptation to a novel resource. Evolution 65: 2481-2491.
2. Ahlroth, P., Alatalo, R.V., Holopainen, A., Kumpulainen, T. & Suhonen, J. 2003. Founder population size and number of source populations enhance colonization success in waterstriders. Oecologia 137: 617-620.
3. Armstrong, D.P. & Seddon, P.J. 2008. Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 20-25.
4. Ayres, D.R., Smith, D.L., Zaremba, K., Klohr, S. & Strong, D.R. 2004. Spread of exotic cordgrasses and hybrids (Spartina sp.) in the tidal marshes of San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Biol. Invasions 6: 221-231.
5. Beirne, B.P. 1975. Biological control attempts by introductions against pest insects in the field in Canada. Can. Entomol. 107: 225-236.
6. Blackburn, T.M., Pysek, P., Bacher, S., Carlton, J.T., Duncan, R.P., Jarosik, V. et al. 2011. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 333-339.
7. Boykin, L.M., Shatters, R.G., Rosell, R.C., McKenzie, C.L., Bagnall, R.A., De Barro, P. et al. 2007. Global relationships of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) revealed using Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial COI DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 44: 1306-1319.
8. Brown, J.K., Frohlich, D.R. & Rosell, R.C. 1995. The sweet potato or silverleaf whiteflies: biotypes of Bemisia tabaci or a species complex. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40: 511-534.
9. Brown, J.K., Perring, T.M., Cooper, A.D., Bedford, I.D. & Markham, P.G. 2000. Genetic analysis of Bemisia (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) populations by isoelectric focusing electrophoresis. Biochem. Genet. 38: 13-25.
10. Cassey, P., Blackburn, T.M., Sol, S., Duncan, R.P. & Lockwood, J.L. 2004. Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds. Proc. R Soc. B Biol. Sci. 271: S405-S408.
11. Cheptou, P.O. & Donohue, K. 2011. Environment-dependent inbreeding depression: its ecological and evolutionary significance. New Phytol. 189: 395-407.
12. Colautti, R.I., Grigorovich, I.A. & MacIsaac, H.J. 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 8: 1023-1037.
13. Crawford, K.M. & Whitney, K.D. 2010. Population genetic diversity influences colonization success. Mol. Ecol. 19: 1253-1263.
14. Czosnek, H. & Laterrot, H. 1997. A worldwide survey of tomato yellow leaf curl viruses. Arch. Virol. 142: 1391-1406.
15. Drake, J.M. 2006. Heterosis, the catapult effect and establishment success of a colonizing bird. Biol. Lett. 2: 304-307.
16. Duggan, I.C., Rixon, C.A.M. & MacIsaac, H.J. 2006. Popularity and propagule pressure: determinants of introduction and establishment of aquarium fish. Biol. Invasions 8: 377-382.
17. Elam, D.R., Ridley, C.E., Goodell, K. & Ellstrand, N.C. 2007. Population size and relatedness affect fitness of a self-incompatible invasive plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 549-552.
18. Ellner, S.P., Geber, M.A. & Hairston, N.G. 2011. Does rapid evolution matter? Measuring the rate of contemporary evolution and its impacts on ecological dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 14: 603-614.
19. Escobar, J.S., Nicot, A. & David, P. 2008. The different sources of variation in inbreeding depression, heterosis and outbreeding depression in a metapopulation of Physa acuta. Genetics 180: 1593-1608.
20. Facon, B., Jarne, P., Pointier, J.P. & David, P. 2005. Hybridization and invasiveness in the freshwater snail Melanoides tuberculata: hybrid vigour is more important than increase in genetic variance. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 524-535.
21. Fauvergue, X., Vercken, E., Malausa, T. & Hufbauer, R.A. 2012. The biology of small, introduced populations, with special reference to biological control. Evol. Appl. 5: 424-443.
22. Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D.B. 2000. An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biol. Conserv. 96: 1-11.
23. Fisher, R. 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd edn. Dover, New York, NY.
24. Forsman, A., Wennersten, L., Karlsson, M. & Caesar, S. 2012. Variation in founder groups promotes establishment success in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279: 2800-2806.
25. Forsyth, D.M. & Duncan, R.P. 2001. Propagule size and the relative success of exotic ungulate and bird introductions to New Zealand. Am. Nat. 157: 583-595.
26. Fox, C.W. & Reed, D.H. 2011. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution 65: 246-258.
27. Glémin, S. 2003. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating. Evolution 57: 2678-2687.
28. Green, R.E. 1997. The influence of numbers released on the outcome of attempts to introduce exotic bird species to New Zealand. J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 25-35.
29. Grevstad, F.S. 1999. Experimental invasions using biological control introductions: the influence of release size on the chance of population establishment. Biol. Invasions 1: 313-323.
30. Gurevitch, J., Fox, G.A., Wardle, G.M., Inderjit & Taub, D. 2011. Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions. Ecol. Lett. 14: 407-418.
31. Hemmings, N., West, M. & Birkhead, T.R. 2012. Causes of hatching failure in endangered birds. Biol. Lett. 8: 964-967.
32. Henter, H.J. 2003. Inbreeding depression and haplodiploidy: experimental measures in a parasitoid and comparisons across diploid and haplodiploid insect taxa. Evolution 57: 1793-1803.
33. Hughes, A.R., Inouye, B.D., Johnson, M.T.J., Underwood, N. & Vellend, M. 2008. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol. Lett. 11: 609-623.
34. Jones, D.R. 2003. Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 109: 195-219.
35. Keller, L.F. & Waller, D.M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 230-241.
36. van Kleunen, M., Dawson, W., Schlaepfer, D., Jeschke, J.M. & Fischer, M. 2010. Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecol. Lett. 13: 947-958.
37. Kolar, C.S. & Lodge, D.M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 199-204.
38. Kolbe, J.J., Glor, R.E., Schettino, L.R.G., Lara, A.C., Larson, A. & Losos, J.B. 2004. Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431: 177-181.
39. Lockwood, J.L., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 223-228.
40. Marrs, R.A., Sforza, R. & Hufbauer, R.A. 2008. Evidence for multiple introductions of Centaurea stoebe micranthos (spotted knapweed, Asteraceae) to North America. Mol. Ecol. 17: 4197-4208.
41. McCauley, D.E. 1991. Genetic consequences of local-population extinction and recolonization. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 5-8.
42. Memmott, J., Craze, P.G., Harman, H.M., Syrett, P. & Fowler, S.V. 2005. The effect of propagule size on the invasion of an alien insect. J. Anim. Ecol. 74: 50-62.
43. Newman, D. & Pilson, D. 1997. Increased probability of extinction due to decreased genetic effective population size: experimental populations of Clarkia pulchella. Evolution 51: 354-362.
44. Perring, T.M. 2001. The Bemisia tabaci species complex. Crop Prot. 20: 725-737.
45. Pray, L.A., Schwartz, J.M., Goodnight, C.J. & Stevens, L. 1994. Environmental dependency of inbreeding depression: implications for conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 8: 562-568.
46. SAS Institute. JMP Version 9.0.2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
47. SAS Institute. I. SAS/STAT Software: changes and enhancements through release 9.1. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC, USA.
48. Simberloff, D. 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 81-102.
49. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1998. Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Compny, New York, NY, USA.
50. Szucs, M., Eigenbrode, S.D., Schwarzlander, M. & Schaffner, U. 2012. Hybrid vigor in the biological control agent, Longitarsus jacobaeae. Evol. Appl. 5: 489-497.
51. Tayeh, A., Estoup, A., Hufbauer, R.A., Ravigne, V., Goryacheva, I., Zakharov, I.A. 2013. Investigating the genetic load of an emblematic invasive species: the case of the invasive harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis. Ecol. Evol. 3: 864-871.
52. Von Holle, B. & Simberloff, D. 2005. Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86: 3212-3218.
53. White, T.H., Collar, N.J., Moorhouse, R.J., Sanz, V., Stolen, E.D. & Brightsmith, D.J. 2012. Psittacine reintroductions: common denominators of success. Biol. Conserv. 148: 106-115.