Temporal structure coding with and without awareness

Cognition

Volumn 131, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 404-414

  Faivre, N ^a   Koch, C ^a,b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b ALLEN INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

Apparent motion; Biological motion; Consciousness; Continuous flash suppression; Temporal integration

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONSCIOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISIBILITY; VISUAL ACUITY; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; BIOMECHANICS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AWARENESS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896955988     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Akyürek E.G., Meijerink S.K. The deployment of visual attention during temporal integration: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology 2012, 49:885-898. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01380.x.
2. Anstis S., Giaschi D., Cogan A.I. Adaptation to apparent motion. Vision Research 1985, 25:1051-1062.
3. Anstis S.M. The perception of apparent movement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 1980, 290:153-168.
4. Bahrami B., Carmel D., Walsh V., Rees G., Lavie N. Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(3):1-10. http://journalofvision.org/8/3/12/. 10.1167/8.3.12.
5. Barbot A., Kouider S. Longer is not better: Nonconscious overstimulation reverses priming influences under interocular suppression. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2012, 74:174-184.
6. Blake R., Ahlström U., Alais D. Perceptual priming by invisible motion. Psychological Science 1999, 10:145-150.
7. Blake R., Lee S.H. The role of temporal structure in human vision. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 2005, 4:21-42.
8. Blake R., Tadin D., Sobel K.V., Raissian T.A., Chong S.C. Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:4783-4788.
9. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
10. Cohen M.A., Cavanagh P., Chun M.M., Nakayama K. The attentional requirements of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2012, 16:411-417.
11. Cutting J.E., Kozlowski L.T. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1977, 9:353-356.
12. Dawson M.R. The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: Modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem. Psychological Review 1991, 98:569-603.
13. Dehaene S., Changeux J.P. Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron 2011, 70:200-227.
14. Downing P.E., Jiang Y., Shuman M., Kanwisher N.A. Cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 2001, 293:2470-2473.
15. Engel A.K., Singer W. Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends in cognitive sciences 2001, 5(1):16-25.
16. Faivre N., Kouider S. Increased sensory evidence reverses nonconscious priming during crowding. Journal of Vision 2011, 11(13:1):1-13.
17. Faivre N., Kouider S. Multi-feature objects elicit nonconscious priming despite crowding. Journal of Vision 2011, 11(3:):1-10.
18. Faivre, N. & Koch, C., Inferring the direction of implied motion depends on visual awareness, Journal of Vision, in press.
19. Faivre N., Charron S., Roux P., Lehéricy S., Kouider S. Nonconscious emotional processing involves distinct neural pathways for pictures and videos. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(14):3736-3744.
20. Geisler W.S. Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction. Nature 1999, 400:65-69.
21. Giese M.A., Poggio T. Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2003, 4:179-192.
22. Grossman E., Donnelly M., Price R., Pickens D., Morgan V., Neighbor G., et al. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:711-720.
23. Hasson U., Malach R., Heeger D.J. Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14:40-48.
24. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 1973, 14:201-211.
25. Jordan H., Fallah M., Stoner G.R. Adaptation of gender derived from biological motion. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9:738-739.
26. Kanai R., Verstraten F.A.J. Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: Motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization. Vision Research 2005, 45:3109-3116.
27. Koch C., Tsuchiya N. Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in cognitive sciences 2007, 11(1):16-22.
28. Kohler A., Haddad L., Singer W., Muckli L. Deciding what to see: The role of intention and attention in the perception of apparent motion. Vision Research 2008, 48:1096-1106.
29. Kouider S., Berthet V., Faivre N. Preference is biased by crowded facial expressions. Psychological Science 2011, 22:184-189.
30. Kruse P., Stadler M., Wehner T. Direction and frequency specific processing in the perception of long-range apparent movement. Vision Research 1986, 26:327-335.
31. Lamme V.A., Roelfsema P.R. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences 2000, 23(11):571-579.
32. Lamme V.A. Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:12-18.
33. Lange J., Lappe M. A model of biological motion perception from configural form cues. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:2894-2906.
34. Lin Z., He S. Seeing the invisible: The scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry. Progress in Neurobiology 2009, 87:195-211.
35. Lu Z.L., Sperling G. Attention-generated apparent motion. Nature 1995, 377(6546):237-239.
36. Mather G., Murdoch L. Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences 1994, 258:273-279.
37. Mattler U. Inhibition and decay of motor and nonmotor priming. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67:285-300.
38. Muckli L., Kriegeskorte N., Lanfermann H., Zanella F.E., Singer W., Goebel R. Apparent motion: Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging of perceptual switches and States. Journal of Neuroscience 2002, 22. RC219.
39. Mudrik L., Breska A., Lamy D., Deouell L.Y. Integration Without Awareness Expanding the Limits of Unconscious Processing. Psychological Science 2011, 22(6):764-770.
40. Neri P., Morrone M.C., Burr D.C. Seeing biological motion. Nature 1997, 395(894-896):1998.
41. Pelli D. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
42. R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
43. Rajimehr R., Vaziri-Pashkam M., Afraz S.R., Esteky H. Adaptation to apparent motion in crowding condition. Vision Research 2004, 44:925-993.
44. Ramachandran V.S. Suppression of apparent movement during binocular rivalry. Nature 1975, 256:122-123.
45. Ramsøy T., Overgaard M. Introspection and subliminal perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2004, 3(1):1-23.
46. Sackur J., Dehaene S. The cognitive architecture for chaining of two mental operations. Cognition 2009, 111(2):187-211.
47. Thompson J., Parasuraman R. Attention, biological motion, and action recognition. Neuroimage 2012, 59(1):4-13.
48. Thurman, S.M., & Grossman, E.D. (2008). Temporal "Bubbles" reveal key features for point-light biological motion.
49. Tononi G. Information integration: Its relevance to brain function and consciousness. Archives Italiennes de Biologie 2010, 148:299-322.
50. Troje N.F. Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision 2002, 2:371-387.
51. Troje N.F., Sadr J., Geyer H., Nakayama K. Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of gender from biological motion. Journal of Vision 2006, 6:850-857.
52. Troje N.F. Retrieving information from human movement patterns. Represent, and act on events 2008, 308-334. Oxford University Press. T.F. Shipley, J.M. Zacks (Eds.).
53. Tsuchiya N., Koch C. Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1096-1101.
54. Tsuchiya N., Koch C., Gilroy L.A., Blake R. Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 2006, 6:1068-1078.
55. Visser T.A.W., Enns J.T. The role of attention in temporal integration. Perception 2001, 30(2):135-145.
56. Wang X.-J. Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits. Neuron 2002, 36:955-968.
57. Whelan R. Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record 2010, 58:9.
58. Wiesenfelder H., Blake R. Apparent motion can survive binocular rivalry suppression. Vision Research 1991, 31:1589-1599.
59. Yeshurun Y., Levy L. Transient spatial attention degrades temporal resolution. Psychological Science 2003, 14(3):225-231.
60. Yeshurun Y., Marom G. Transient spatial attention and the perceived duration of brief visual events. Visual Cognition 2008, 16(6):826-848.
61. Yeshurun Y., Hein E. Transient attention degrades perceived apparent motion. Perception 2011, 40(8):905-918.