Inhibition and decay of motor and nonmotor priming

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 285-300

  Mattler, Uwe ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244466422     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206492     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. ABRAMS, R. L., & GREENWALD, A. G. (2000). Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychological Science, 11, 118-124.
2. ALLPORT, A., STYLES, E. A., & HSIEH, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
3. BAND, G. P., & VAN BOXTEL, G. J. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: Review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologies, 101, 179-211.
4. BREITMEYER, B. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. DEHAENE, S., NACCACHE, L., LE CLEC'H, G., KOECHLIN, E., MUELLER, M., DEHAENE-LAMBERTZ, G., VAN DE MOORTELE, P. F., & LE BIHAN, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395 600-604.
6. EIMER, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-313.
7. EIMER, M., HOMMEL, B., & PRINZ, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301-313.
8. EIMER, M., & SCHLAGHECKEN, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
9. EIMER, M., & SCHLAGHECKEN, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 514-520.
10. FEHRER, E., & RAAB, D. (1962). Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 143-147.
11. FRANCIS, G. (1997). Cortical dynamics of lateral inhibition: Metacontrast masking. Psychological Review, 104, 572-594.
12. GREENWALD, A. G., DRAINE, S. C., & ABRAMS, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273, 1699-1702.
13. HOMMEL, B. (1997). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 59, 248-260.
14. HOUGHTON, G., & TIPPER, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego: Academic Press.
15. KANWISHER, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token identification. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
16. KLAPP, S. T., & HINKLEY, L. B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255-269.
17. KLINGER, M. R., BURTON, P. C., & PITTS, G. S. (2000). Mechanisms of unconscious priming: I. Response competition, not spreading activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 441-455.
18. KLOTZ, W., & NEUMANN, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 976-992.
19. LAW, M. B., PRATT, J., & ABRAMS, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 402-408.
20. LEUTHOLD, H., & KOPP, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263-269.
21. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
22. MATTLER, U. (2003). Priming of mental operations by masked stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 167-187.
23. MILLIKEN, B., & TIPPER, S. P. (1998). Attention and inhibition. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 191-222). Hove, U.K.: Psychological Press.
24. MONSELL, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind (pp. 93-148). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
25. NACCACHE, L., & DEHAENE, S. (2001a). The priming method: Imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 966-974.
26. NACCACHE, L., & DEHAENE, S. (2001b). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition, 80, 215-229.
27. NEUMANN, O., & KLOTZ, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 124-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
28. PASHLER, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
29. RAYMOND, J. E., SHAPIRO, K. L., & ARNELL, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849-860.
30. RIDDERINKHOF, K. R. (2002). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 494-519). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. ROGERS, R. D., & MONSELL, S. M. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
32. SCHLAGHECKEN, F., & EIMER, M. (2000). A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1367-1382.
33. SCHLAGHECKEN, F., & EIMER, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 148-162.
34. SCHMIDT, T. (2000). Visual perception without awareness: Priming responses by color. In T. Metzinger (Ed.), Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions (pp. 157-169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. SCHMIDT, T. (2002). The finger in flight: Real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 112-118.
36. SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (1997). On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 389-403.
37. TIPPER, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
38. VORBERG, D. (1998). Reaktion auf unbewusste visuelle Reize: Umkehr von Bahnung in Hemmung. In H. Lachnit, A. Jacobs, & F. Roesler (Eds.), Experimentelle Psychologie (p. 386-387). Lengerich: Pabst.
39. VORBERG, D. (2002). Gibt es unbewusste Wahrnehmung, und wenn ja, warum nicht? In M. Baumann, A. Keinath, & J. F. Krems (Eds.), Experimentelle Psychologie (p. 8). Regensburg: Roderer Verlag.
40. VORBERG, D., & LINGNAU, A. (in press). Time course of the negative compatibility effect with central and peripheral presentation of the effective stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics.
41. VORBERG, D., MATTLER, U., HEINECKE, A., SCHMIDT, T., & SCHWARZBACH, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 6275-6280.
42. WENTURA, D. (2000). Dissociative affective and associative priming effects in the lexical decision task: Yes versus no responses to word targets reveal evaluative judgment tendencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 456-469.
43. WOLFF, P. (1989). Einfluss des maskierten Testreizes auf die Wahlreaktion auf den Maskierreiz bei Metakontrast. Paper presented at the 31st Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Bamberg, Germany.