Increased sensory evidence reverses nonconscious priming during crowding

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 13, 2011, Pages

  Faivre, Nathan ^a   Kouider, Sid ^a  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Crowding; Perceptual awareness; Priming; Sensory adaptation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CROWDING; EGO DEVELOPMENT; HABITUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AWARENESS; CROWDING; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81555208989     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.13.16     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andriessen, J. J., & Bouma, H. (1976). Eccentric vision: Adverse interactions between line segments. Vision Research, 16, 71-78.
2. Bahrami, B., Carmel, D., Walsh, V., Rees, G., & Lavie, N. (2008). Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load. Journal of Vision, 8(3):12, 1-10, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/3/12, doi:10.1167/8.3.12.
3. Barbot, A., & Kouider, S. (in press). Longer is not better: Nonconscious overstimulation reverses priming influences under interocular suppression. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
4. Bi, T., Cai, P., Zhou, T., & Fang, F. (2009). The effect of crowding on orientation-selective adaptation in human early visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 9(11):13, 1-10, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/11/13, doi:10.1167/9.11.13.
5. Blake, R., Tadin, D., Sobel, K. V., Raissian, T. A., & Chong, S. C. (2006). Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 4783-4788.
6. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
7. de Gardelle, V., Kouider, S.,&Sackur, J. (2010). An oblique illusion modulated by visibility: Non-monotonic sensory integration in orientation processing. Journal of Vision, 10(10):6, 1-9, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/10/6, doi:10.1167/10.10.6.
8. Dehaene, S., Changeux, J. P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 204-211.
9. Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1-37.
10. Desimone, R. (1996). Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 13494-13499.
11. Dupoux, E., de Gardelle, V., & Kouider, S. (2008). Subliminal speech perception and auditory streaming. Cognition, 109, 267-273.
12. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2003). Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 64, 7-26.
13. Faivre, N., & Kouider, S. (2011). Multi-feature objects elicit nonconscious priming despite crowding. Journal of Vision, 11(3):2, 1-10, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/3/2, doi:10.1167/11.3.2.
14. Fang, F., Murray, S. O., Kersten, D., & He, S. (2005). Orientation-tuned FMRI adaptation in human visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 4188-4195.
15. Ferrand, L. (1996). The masked repetition priming effect dissipates when increasing the interstimulus interval: Evidence from word naming. Acta Psychologica, 91, 15-25.
16. Gardner, J. L., Sun, P., Waggoner, R. A., Ueno, K., Tanaka, K., & Cheng, K. (2005). Contrast adaptation and representation in human early visual cortex. Neuron, 47, 607-620.
17. Gotts, S. (2003). Mechanisms underlying enhanced processing efficiency in neural systems. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
18. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., & Schuh, E. S. (1995). Activation by marginally perceptible ("subliminal") stimuli: Dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 22-42.
19. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulusspecific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 14-23.
20. He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334-337.
21. Intriligator, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171-216.
22. Kaliukhovich, D. A., & Vogels, R. (2011). Stimulus repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1547-1558.
23. Kohn, A. (2007). Visual adaptation: Physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 3155-3164.
24. Kooi, F. L., Toet, A., Tripathy, S. P., & Levi, D. M. (1994). The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision, 8, 255-279.
25. Kouider, S., Berthet, V., & Faivre, N. (2011). Preference is biased by crowded facial expressions. Psychological Science, 22, 184-189.
26. Kouider, S., & Dehaene, S. (2007). Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual masking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 362, 857-875.
27. Kouider, S., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Subliminal number priming within and across the visual and auditory modalities. Experimental Psychology, 56, 418-433.
28. Kouider, S., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., & Le Bihan, D. (2007). Cerebral bases of subliminal and supraliminal priming during reading. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2019-2029.
29. Lamme, V. A., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571-579.
30. Levi, D. M. (2008). CrowdingVAn essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review. Vision Research, 48, 635-654.
31. Lin, Z., & He, S. (2009). Seeing the invisible: The scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry. Progress in Neurobiology, 87, 195-211.
32. Montaser-Kouhsari, L., & Rajimehr, R. (2005). Subliminal attentional modulation in crowding condition. Vision Research, 45, 839-844.
33. Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 416-424.
34. Parkes, L., Lund, J., Angelucci, A., Solomon, J. A., & Morgan, M. (2001). Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 739-744.
35. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
36. Ringach, D. L., Hawken, M. J., & Shapley, R. (1997). Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex. Nature, 387, 281-284.
37. Summerfield, C., Trittschuh, E. H., Monti, J. M., Mesulam, M. M., & Egner, T. (2008). Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1004-1006.
38. Suzuki, S., & Grabowecky, M. (2003). Attention during adaptation weakens negative afterimages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 793-807.
39. VanRullen, R., & Koch, C. (2003). Is perception discrete or continuous? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 207-213.
40. Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 113-120.
41. Webster, M. A. (2011). Adaptation and visual coding. Journal of Vision, 11(5):3, 1-23, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/5/3, doi:10.1167/11.5.3.
42. Wentura, D., & Frings, C. (2005). Repeated masked category primes interfere with related exemplars: New evidence for negative semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 108-120.
43. Wiggs, C. L., & Martin, A. (1998). Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 227-233.
44. Zago, L., Fenske, M. J., Aminoff, E., & Bar, M. (2005). The rise and fall of priming: How visual exposure shapes cortical representations of objects. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1655-1665.