The neural bases of difficult speech comprehension and speech production: Two Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses

Brain and Language

Volumn 122, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 42-54

  Adank, Patti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Articulation; Auditory; FMRI; Meta analysis; Neuroimaging; Perception; PET; Production; Speech

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; ANTERIOR INSULA; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; NEUROIMAGING; PERCEPTION; SPEECH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL SULCUS; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; NEUROIMAGING; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84861973240     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Adank P., Devlin J.T. On-line plasticity in spoken sentence comprehension: Adapting to time-compressed speech. NeuroImage 2010, 49(1):1124-1132.
2. Adank P., Davis M., Hagoort P. Neural dissociation in processing noise and accent in spoken language comprehension. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(1):77-84.
3. Adank P., Evans B.G., Stuart-Smith J., Scott S.K. Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35(2):520-529.
4. Adank P., Noordzij M.L., Hagoort P. The role of Planum Temporale in processing accent variation in spoken language comprehension. Human Brain Mapping 2012, 33(2):360-372.
5. Alario F.X., Chainay H., Lehericy S., Cohen L. The role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in word production. Brain Research 2006, 1076(1):129-143.
6. Aleman A., Formisano E., Koppenhagen H., Hagoort P., de Haan E.H., Kahn R.S. The functional neuroanatomy of metrical stress evaluation of perceived and imagined spoken words. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(2):221-228.
7. Allen P.P., Amaro E., Fu C.H.Y., Williams S.C.R., Brammer M., Johns L.C., et al. Neural correlates of the misattribution of self-generated speech. Human Brain Mapping 2005, 26(1):44-53.
8. Binder J.R., Swanson S.J., Hammeke T.A., Sabsevitz D.S. A comparison of five fMRI protocols for mapping speech comprehension systems. Epilepsia 2008, 49(12):1980-1997.
9. Blank S.C., Scott S.K., Murphy K., Warburton E., Wise R.J. Speech production: Wernicke, Broca and beyond. Brain 2002, 125(8):1829-1838.
10. Bohland J.W., Guenther F.H. An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production. NeuroImage 2006, 32(2):821-841.
11. Brown S., Laird A.R., Pfordresher P.Q., Thelen S.M., Turkeltaub P., Liotti M. The somatotopy of speech: Phonation and articulation in the human motor cortex. Brain and Cognition 2009, 70(1):31-41.
12. Crescentini C., Shallice T., Macaluso E. Item retrieval and competition in noun and verb generation: An FMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22(6):1140-1157.
13. Crinion J.T., Lambon-Ralph M.A., Warburton E.A., Howard D., Wise R.S.J. Temporal lobe regions engaged during normal speech comprehension. Brain 2003, 126(5):1193-1201.
14. Crinion J.T., Price C.J. Right anterior superior temporal activation predicts auditory sentence comprehension following aphasic stroke. Brain 2005, 128(12):2858-2871.
15. Davis M.H., Ford M.A., Kherif F., Johnsrude I.S. Does semantic context benefit speech understanding through " top-down" processes? Evidence from time-resolved sparse fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(12):3914-3932.
16. Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23(8):3423-3431.
17. Dick F., Saygin A.P., Galati G., Pitzalis S., Bentrovato S., D'Amico S., et al. What is involved and what is necessary for complex linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory processing: Evidence from functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and lesion data. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19(5):799-816.
18. Dogil G., Ackermann H., Grodd W., Haider H., Kamp H., Mayer J., et al. The speaking brain: A tutorial introduction to fMRI experiments in the production of speech, prosody and syntax. Journal of Neurolinguistics 2002, 15(1):59-90.
19. Dronkers N.F., Redfern B.B., Knight R.T. The neural architecture of language disorders. The new cognitive neurosciences 2000, 949-958. MIT Press, Cambridge. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
20. Dronkers N.F., Wilkins D.P., Van Valin R., Redfern B.B., Jaeger J. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition 2004, 92(1-2):145-177.
21. Dupoux E., Green K. Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: Effects of talker and rate changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23(3):914-927.
22. Eickhoff S.B., Heim S., Zilles K., Amunts K. A systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 2009, 367(1896):2399-2421.
23. Fridriksson J., Moser D., Ryalls J., Bonilla L., Rorden C., Baylis G. Modulation of frontal lobe speech areas associated with the production and perception of speech movements. Journal of Speech, Hearing and Language Research 2009, 52:812-819.
24. Friederici A.D., Kotz S.A., Scott S.K., Obleser J. Disentangling syntax and intelligibility in auditory language comprehension. Human Brain Mapping 2010, 31(3):448-457.
25. Ghosh S.S., Tourville J.A., Guenther F.H. A neuroimaging study of premotor lateralization and cerebellar involvement in the production of phonemes and syllables. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2008, 51(5):1183-1202.
26. Golfinopoulos E., Tourville J.A., Bohland J.W., Ghosh S.S., Nieto-Castanon A., Guenther F.H. FMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech. NeuroImage 2011, 55(3):1324-1338.
27. Gonzalez-Castillo J., Talavage T. Reproducibility of fMRI activations associated with auditory sentence comprehension. NeuroImage 2011, 53(3):2138-2155.
28. Hackett T.A., Stepniewska I., Kaas J.H. Prefrontal connections of the parabelt auditory cortex in macaque monkeys. Brain Research 1999, 817(1-2):45-58.
29. Heim S., Friederici A.D., Schiller N.O., Ruschemeyer S.A., Amunts K. The determiner congruency effect in language production investigated with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping 2009, 30(3):928-940.
30. Hickok G., Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2007, 8:393-402.
31. Holt L., Lotto A. Speech perception within an auditory cognitive science framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17(1):42-46.
32. Indefrey P., Levelt W.J.M. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 2004, 92(1-2):101-144.
33. Ischebeck A.K., Friederici A.D., Alter K. Processing prosodic boundaries in natural and hummed speech: An FMRI study. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18(3):541-552.
34. Jardri R., Pins D., Bubrovszky M., Despretz P., Pruvo J.P., Steinling M., et al. Self awareness and speech processing: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 2007, 35(4):1645-1653.
35. Kell C.A., Morillon B., Kouneiher F., Giraud A. Lateralization of speech production starts in sensory cortices-A possible sensory origin of cerebral left dominance for speech. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 21(4):932-937.
36. Laird A.R., Fox P.M., Price C.J., Glahn D.C., Uecker A.M., Lancaster J.L., et al. ALE meta-analysis: Controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts. Human Brain Mapping 2005, 25:155-164.
37. Leff A.P., Schofield T.M., Stephan K.E., Crinion J.T., Friston K.J., Price C.J. The cortical dynamics of intelligible speech. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 28(49):13209-13215.
38. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking: From intention to articulation 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
39. Liberman A.M., Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 1985, 21:1-36.
40. Liberman A.M., Whalen D.H. On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(5):187-196.
41. Mattys S.L., Brooks J., Cooke M. Recognizing speech under a processing load: Dissociating energetic from informational factors. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 59:203-243.
42. Moineau S., Dronkers N.F., Bates E. Exploring the processing continuum of single-word comprehension in aphasia. Journal of Speech, Hearing and Language Research 2005, 48:884-896.
43. Munro M.J., Derwing T.M. Foreign accent comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 1995, 45(1):73-97.
44. Narain C., Scott S.K., Wise R.J., Rosen S., Leff A., Iversen S.D., et al. Defining a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI. Cerebral Cortex 2003, 13(12):1362-1368.
45. Obleser J., Eisner F., Kotz S.A. Bilateral speech comprehension reflects differential sensitivity to spectral and temporal features. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(32):8116-8123.
46. Obleser J., Kotz S.A. Expectancy constraints in degraded speech modulate the language comprehension network. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(3):633-640.
47. Obleser J., Meyer L., Friederici A.D. Dynamic assignment of neural resources in auditory comprehension of complex sentences. NeuroImage 2011, 56(4):2310-2320.
48. Obleser J., Wise R.J.S., Dresner M.A., Scott S.K. Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:2283-2289.
49. Okada K., Rong F., Venezia J., Matchin W., Hsieh I.H., Saberi K., et al. Hierarchical organization of human auditory cortex: Evidence from acoustic invariance in the response to intelligible speech. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(10):2486-2495.
50. Peelle J.E., Eason R.J., Schmitter S., Schwarzbauer C., Davis M.H. Evaluating an acoustically quiet EPI sequence for use in fMRI studies of speech and auditory processing. NeuroImage 2010, 52(4):1410-1419.
51. Peelle J.E., Johnsrude I.S., Davis M.H. Hierarchical processing for speech in human auditory cortex and beyond. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010, 4:1-3.
52. Peelle J.E., McMillan C., Moore P., Grossman M., Wingfield A. Dissociable patterns of brain activity during comprehension of rapid and syntactically complex speech: Evidence from fMRI. Brain and Language 2004, 91(3):315-325.
53. Peeva M.G., Guenther F.H., Tourville J.A., Nieto-Castanon A., Anton J.L., Nazarian B., et al. Distinct representations of phonemes, syllables, and supra-syllabic sequences in the speech production network. NeuroImage 2010, 50(2):626-638.
54. Pickering M.J., Garrod S. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11(3):105-110.
55. Poldrack R.A., Temple E., Protopapas A., Nagarajan S., Tallal P., Merzenich M., et al. Relations between the neural bases of dynamic auditory processing and phonological processing: Evidence from fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13(5):687-697.
56. Rauschecker J.P., Scott S.K. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: Nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nature Neuroscience 2009, 12(6):718-724.
57. Riecker A., Wildgruber D., Dogil G., Grodd W., Ackermann H. Hemispheric lateralization effects of rhythm implementation during syllable repetitions: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 2002, 16(1):169-176.
58. Rimol L.M., Specht K., Hugdahl K. Controlling for individual differences in fMRI brain activation to tones, syllables, and words. NeuroImage 2006, 30(2):554-562.
59. Rodd J.M., Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(8):1261-1269.
60. Rodd J.M., Longe O.L., Randall B., Tyler L.K. The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: Evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(5):1324-1335.
61. Saur D., Schelte B., Schnell S., Kratochvil D., Küpper D., Kellmeyer P., et al. Combining functional and anatomical connectivity reveals brain networks for auditory language comprehension. NeuroImage 2010, 49(3187-3197).
62. Schmitter S., Diesch E., Amann M., Kroll A., Moayer M., Schad L.R. Silent echo-planar imaging for auditory FMRI. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 2008, 21(5):317-325.
63. Schon D., Gordon R., Campagne A., Magne C., Astesano C., Anton J.L., et al. Similar cerebral networks in language, music and song perception. NeuroImage 2010, 51(1):450-461.
64. Schroeder M.R. Reference signal for signal quality studies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1968, 44:1735-1736.
65. Scott S.K., Blank C.C., Rosen S., Wise R.J. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 2000, 123(12):2400-2406.
66. Scott S.K., Rosen S., Lang H., Wise R.J.S. Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded speech - A positron emission tomography study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 120(2):1075-1083.
67. Seifritz E., Di Salle F., Esposito F., Herdener M., Neuhoff J.G., Scheffler K. Enhancing BOLD response in the auditory system by neuro-physiologically tuned fMRI sequence. NeuroImage 2006, 29(3):1013-1022.
68. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995, 270:303-304.
69. Sharp D.J., Awad M., Warren J.E., Wise R.J., Vigliocco G., Scott S.K. The neural response to changing semantic and perceptual complexity during language processing. Human Brain Mapping 2010, 31(3):365-377.
70. Shuster L.I. The effect of sublexical and lexical frequency on speech production: An fMRI investigation. Brain Lang 2009, 111(1):66-72.
71. Shuster L.I., Lemieux S.K. An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words. Brain and Language 2005, 93(1):20-31.
72. Skipper J.I., Nusbaum H.C., Small S.L. Lending a helping hand to hearing: Another motor theory of speech perception. Action to language via the mirror neuron system 2006, 250-285. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M.A. Arbib (Ed.).
73. Soros P., Sokoloff L.G., Bose A., McIntosh A.R., Graham S.J., Stuss D.T. Clustered functional MRI of overt speech production. NeuroImage 2006, 32(1):376-387.
74. Stevenson R.A., James T.W. Audiovisual integration in human superior temporal sulcus: Inverse effectiveness and the neural processing of speech and object recognition. NeuroImage 2009, 44(3):1210-1223.
75. Stowe L.A., Broere C.A., Paans A.M., Wijers A.A., Mulder G., Vaalburg W., et al. Localizing components of a complex task: Sentence processing and working memory. Neuroreport 1998, 9(2995-2999).
76. Tremblay P., Small S.L. On the context-dependent nature of the contribution of the ventral premotor cortex to speech perception. NeuroImage 2011.
77. Turkeltaub P.E., Coslett H.B. Localization of sublexical speech perception components. Brain and Language 2010, 114:1-15.
78. Turkeltaub P.E., Eden G.F., Jones K.M., Zeffiro T.A. Meta_analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single word reading: Method and validation. NeuroImage 2002, 16:765-780.
79. Tyler L.K., Shafto M.A., Randall B., Wright P., Marslen-Wilson W.D., Stamatakis E.A. Preserving syntactic processing across the adult life span: The modulation of the frontotemporal language system in the context of age-related atrophy. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(2):352-364.
80. Utman J., Blumstein S.E., Sullivan K. Mapping from sound to meaning: reduced lexical activation in Broca's aphasics. Brain and Language 2001, 79:444-472.
81. Vigneau M., Beaucousin V., Herve P., Jobard G., Petit L., Crivello F., et al. What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis. NeuroImage 2011, 54(1):577-593.
82. Whalen D., Benson R.R., Richardson M., Swainson B., Clark V.P., Lai S., et al. Differentiation of speech and nonspeech processing within primary auditory cortex. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 119(1):575-581.
83. Whitney C., Weis S., Krings T., Huber W., Grossman M., Kircher T. Task-dependent modulations of prefrontal and hippocampal activity during intrinsic word production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(4):697-712.
84. Wildgruber D., Hertrich I., Riecker A., Erb M., Anders S., Grodd W., et al. Distinct frontal regions subserve evaluation of linguistic and emotional aspects of speech intonation. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14(12):1384-1389.
85. Wilson S.M., Molnar-Szakacs I., Iacoboni M. Beyond superior temporal cortex: Intersubject correlations in narrative speech comprehension. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18(1):230-242.
86. Wilson S.M., Saygin A.P., Sereno M.I., Iacoboni M. Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:701-702.
87. Wong P.C.M., Uppanda A.K., Parrish T.B., Dhar S. Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Hearing and Language Research 2008, 51:1026-1041.
88. Zheng Z.Z., Munhall K.G., Johnsrude I.S. Functional overlap between regions involved in speech perception and in monitoring one's own voice during speech production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 22(8):1770-1781.