Valuing patients' experiences of healthcare processes: Towards broader applications of existing methods

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 106, Issue , 2014, Pages 194-203

  Ryan, Mandy ^a   Kinghorn, Philip ^a,b   Entwistle, Vikki A ^c,d   Francis, Jill J ^c,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^e CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Capabilities approach; Economic evaluation; Patient acceptance of healthcare; Process utility; Quality of healthcare

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICES; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER; VALUATION;

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL STAFF; NURSE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PHYSICIAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CAPABILITIES APPROACH; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTHCARE; PROCESS UTILITY; QUALITY OF HEALTHCARE;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84896879469     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. AHRQ National disparities report 2011 2012, (Publication No. 12-006), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services.
2. Baker R. Economic rationality and health and lifestyle choices for people with diabetes. Social Science & Medicine 2006, 63:2341-2353.
3. Baker R., Thompson C., Mannion R. Qmethodology in health economics. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2006, 11(1):38-45.
4. de Bekker-Grob E., Ryan M., Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Economics 2012, 20:145-172.
5. Birch S., Melnikow J., Kuppermann M. Conservative versus aggressive follow up of mildly abnormal Pap smears: testing for process utility. Health Economics 2003, 12:879-884.
6. Bishai D.M., Chu Lang H. The willingness to pay for wait reduction: the disutility of queues for cataract surgery in Canada, Denmark, and Spain. Journal of Health Economics 2000, 19:219-230.
7. Bradford W.D., Kleit A., Krousel-Wood M.A., Re R.M. Comparing willingness to pay for telemedicine across a chronic heart failure and hypertension population. Telemedicine and e-Health 2005, 11(4).
8. Churchman C.W., Ackoff R.L. An approximate measure of value. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America 1954, 2:172-187.
9. Coast J., Flynn T., Natarajan L., Sproston K., Lewis J., Louviere J.J., et al. Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Social Science & Medicine 2008, 67:874-882.
10. Coast J., Flynn T., Sutton E., Al-Janabi H., Vosper J., Lavender S., et al. Investigating choice experiments for preferences of older people (ICEPOP): evaluating spaces in health economics. Journal of Health Services Research Policy 2008, 13(Suppl. 3):31-37.
11. Coast J., Smith R.D., Lorgelly P. Should the capability approach be applied in health economics?. Health Economics 2008, 17:667-670.
12. Coast J., Salisbury C., de Berker D., Noble S., Horrocks S., Peters T., et al. Preferences for aspects of a dermatology consultation. British Journal of Dermatology 2006, 155:387-391.
13. Department of Health Human rights in healthcare: A short introduction 2008, Best Practice Guidance, 07 October.
14. Department of Health Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS 2010, White Paper.
15. Dolan J.G., Isselhardt B.J., Cappuccio J.D. The analytical hierarchy process in medical decision making: a tutorial. Medical Decision Making 1989, 9(40).
16. Donaldson C. Willingness to pay and publicly funded health care: contradictions in terms?. Office of health economics seminar briefing note November 2011.
17. Elliott M.N., Lehrman W.G., Goldstein E.H., Giordano L.A., Beckett M.K., Cohea C.W., et al. Hospital survey shows improvements in patient experience. Health Affairs 2010, 29(11):2061-2067.
18. Entwistle V., Firnigl D., Ryan M., Francis J., Kinghorn P. Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2012, 17(2):70-78.
19. Entwistle V., Watt I.S. Treating patients as persons: a capabilities approach to support delivery of person-centred care. American Journal of Bioethics 2013, 13(8):29-39.
20. Flynn T., Louviere J.J., Peters T., Coast J. Best-worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it. Journal of Health Economics 2007, 26:171-189.
21. Flynn T., Louviere J.J., Peters T., Coast J. Estimating preferences for a dermatology consultation using Best-Worst Scaling: comparison of various methods of analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2008, 8:76.
22. Francis R. Independent inquiry into care provided by Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust January 2005-March 2009 2010, The Stationary Office, London.
23. Francis R. The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public enquiry 2013, The Stationary Office, London.
24. Gafni A. The standard gamble method: what is being measured and how it is interpreted. Health Services Research 1994, 29(2):207-224.
25. Gerard K., Salisbury C., Street D.J., Pope C., Baxter H. Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients' preferences. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2008, 13(S2):3-10.
26. Green C. On the societal value of health care: what do we know about the Person trade-off technique?. Health Economics 2001, 10:233-243.
27. Haas M., Sharma R., Stano M. Cost-effectiveness of medical and chiropractic care for acute and chronic low back pain. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2005, 11:40-46.
28. Hoinville G. Evaluating community preferences. Journal of the Market Research Society 1996, 38:483-504.
29. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Accessed 10.11.13. http://www.ihi.org/about/pages/default.aspx.
30. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America Crossing the quality chasm 2001, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
31. Ipsos MORI. The GP Patient Survey. Accessed 21.02.13. http://www.gp-patient.co.uk/.
32. Kinghorn P. Developing a capability approach to measure and value quality of life: An application to chronic pain 2010, School Of Medicine, Health Policy & Practice: University of East Anglia.
33. Lancsar E., Louviere J.J. Estimating individual level discrete choice models and welfare measures using best worst choice experiments. Health Economists' Study Group Meeting 2009, Manchester.
34. Lee J.A., Soutar G., Louviere J.J. The best-worst scaling approach: an alternative to Schwartz's value survey. Journal of Personality Assessment 2008, 90(4):335-347.
35. Longo M.F., Cohen D.R., Hood K., Edwards A., Robling M., Elwyn G., et al. Involving patients in primary care consultations: assessing preferences using discrete choice experiments. British Journal of General Practice 2006, 56:35-42.
36. Louviere J.J., Lancsar E. Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad,the ugly and toward a brighter future. Health Economics, Policy & Law 2009, 4:527-546.
37. McNamee P., Seymour J. Incorporation of process preferences within the QALY framework: a study of alternative methods. Medical Decision Making 2008, 28.
38. Murray C., Evans D.B. Health System Performance Assessment: Debate, methods and empiricism 2003, World Health Organisation, Geneva.
39. NHS Confederation Feeling better? Improving patient experience in hospital 2010, Accessed 21.02.13. http://www.nhsconfed.org/publications/reports/pages/feeling-better-improving-patient-experience-in-hospital.aspx.
40. Nussbaum M. Creating capabilities: The human development approach 2011, Harvard University Press.
41. Parkin D. Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis?. Health Economics 2006, 15(7):653-664.
42. Peacock S.J., Richardson J., Carter R., Edwards D. Priority setting in health care using multi-attribute utility theory and programme budgeting and marginal analysis. Social Science & Medicine 2007, 64(4).
43. Picker Institute Europe. NHS Surveys: Focused on patients' experience. Accessed 21.02.13. http://www.nhssurveys.org/.
44. Richards N., Coulter A. Is the NHS becoming more patient-centred? Trends from the national surveys of NHS patients in England 2002-2007 2007, Picker Institute Europe, Oxford.
45. Richardson G., Bojke C., Kennedy A., Reeves D., Bower P., Lee V., et al. What outcomes are important to patients with long term conditions? A discrete choice experiment. Value in Health 2009, 12:331-339.
46. Robeyns I. The capability approach. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy 2011, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/capability-approach/, E. Zalta (Ed.).
47. Robinson A., Thomson R., Parkin D., Sudlow M., Eccles M. How patients with atrial fibrillation value different health outcomes: a standard gamble study. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2001, 6(2):92-98.
48. Ryan M. Valuing psychological factors in the provision of assisted reproductive techniques using the economic instrument of willingness to pay. Journal of Economic Psychology 1998, 19:179-204.
49. Ryan M., Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000, 320:1530-1533.
50. Ryan M., McIntosh E., Shackley P. Using conjoint analysis to elicit the views of health service users: an application to the patient health care. Health Expectations 1998, 1:117-129.
51. Ryan M., Scott D.A., Reeves C., Bate A., van Teijlingen E., Russell E.M., et al. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technology Assessment 2001, 5(5).
52. Ryser L., Wright B.D., Aeschlimann A., Mariacher-Gehler S., Stucki G. Anew look at the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index using Rasch analysis. Arthritis Care & Research 1999, 12(5).
53. Saaty T.L. Fundamentals of the analytic network process. International Symposium on the Analytic Hierachical Process 1999, Japan.
54. Schwappach D., Strasmann T.J. Does location matter? A study of the public's preferences for surgical care provision. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2007, 13:259-264.
55. Sen A. Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers 1983, 35(2):153-169.
56. Sen A. The idea of justice 2010, Penguin, London.
57. Tennant A., McKenna S.P., Hagell P. Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments. Value in Health 2004, 7(1).
58. The Scottish Government The healthcare quality strategy for Scotland 2010.
59. Torrance G., Thomas W., Sackett D. A utility maximisation model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Services Research 1972, 7:118-133.
60. Williams B., Coyle J., Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Social Science & Medicine 1998, 47:1351-1359..
61. von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W. Decision analysis and behavioural research 1986, Cambridge University Press, New York.