What outcomes are important to patients with long term conditions? A discrete choice experiment

Value in Health

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 331-339

  Richardson, Gerry ^a   Bojke, Chris ^b   Kennedy, Anne ^c   Reeves, David ^c   Bower, Peter ^c   Lee, Victoria ^c   Middleton, Elizabeth ^c   Gardner, Caroline ^c   Gately, Claire ^c   Rogers, Anne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b PHARMERIT INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discrete choice experiment; Health economics; Quality adjusted life years; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNITED KINGDOM; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MENTAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL ISOLATION; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ECONOMIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL ISOLATION; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 60349101386     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00419.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Department of Health. The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century. London : Department of Health, 2001.
2. Department of Health. Self care - A Real Choice: Self Care Support - A Practical Option. London : Department of Health, 2005.
3. Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL, et al. Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care 2001 39 : 1217 23.
4. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, et al. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract 2001 4 : 256 62.
5. Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, et al. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61 : 254 61.
6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977 84 : 191 215.
7. Bandura A, Jeffery RW, Gajdos E. Generalizing change through participant modeling with self-directed mastery. Behav Res Ther 1975 13 : 141 52.
8. Bandura A, Adams NE, Beyer J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. J Pers Soc Psychol 1977 35 : 125 39.
9. Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R. Social cognitive theory. In : Conner M, Norman P, eds. Predicting Health Behaviour: Research and Practice with Social Cogniton Models. Maidenhead : Open University Press, 2005.
10. Gravelle H, Richardson G, Weatherly H, Ritchie G. An Assessment of the Quality of Economic Evaluations of Self Management: Primary Care Team. York : Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 2003.
11. Institute N, Clinical E. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. N London : NICE, 2004.
12. Ryan M. Discrete Choice Experiments in health care. BMJ 2004 328 : 360 61.
13. Lancaster K. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 1966 74 : 132 57.
14. Bergmann A, Hanley N, Wright R., Energy I. Valuing the Attributes of Renewable Energy Investments. 2004 European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists conference. Budapest : European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2004.
15. Manski C. The structure of random utility models. Theory Decis 1977 8 : 229 54.
16. Ryan M, Hughes J. Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Econ 1997 6 : 261 73.
17. Sculpher M, Bryan S, Fry P, et al. Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: Discrete Choice Experiment. BMJ 2004 328 : 382.
18. Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST, Jr., Wittink DR. Risk-attitude and patient treatment preferences. Lupus 2003 12 : 370 6.
19. Gerard K, Lattimer V. Preferences of patients for emergency services available during usual GP surgery hours: a Discrete Choice Experiment. Fam Pract 2005 22 : 28 36.
20. Gyrd-Hansen D. Cost-benefit analysis of mammography screening in Denmark based on discrete ranking data. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000 16 : 811 21.
21. Gyrd-Hansen D, Sogaard J. Analysing public preferences for cancer screening programmes. Health Econ 2001 10 : 617 34.
22. Hall J, Kenny P, King M, et al. Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination. Health Econ 2002 11 : 457 65.
23. Hill AR, Aspinall P, Dhillon B, et al. Utilities for quality of life from time trade-off and conjoint analysis in age related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004 45 : 3080.
24. Hundley V, Ryan M, Graham W. Assessing women's preferences for intrapartum care. Birth 2001 28 : 254 63.
25. Johnson FR, Banzhaf MR, Desvousges WH. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple-format, stated-preference approach. Health Econ 2000 9 : 295 317.
26. Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions. Health Econ 2004 13 : 563 73.
27. McKenzie L, Cairns J, Osman L. Symptom-based outcome measures for asthma: the use of discrete choice methods to assess patient preferences. Health Policy 2001 57 : 193 204.
28. Payne K, Elliott R. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to value preferences for pharmacy services. Int J Pharm Pract 2005 13 : 9 20.
29. Petrou S, Henderson J. Preference-based approaches to measuring the benefits of perinatal care. Birth 2003 30 : 217 26.
30. Ryan M, Netten A, Skatun D, Smith P. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome - an application to social care for older people. J Health Econ 2006 25 : 927 44.
31. Cookson R. Incorporating psycho-social considerations into health valuations: an experimental study. J Health Econ 2000 19 : 369 401.
32. Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000 320 : 1530 3.
33. Ryan M, Bate A, Eastmond CJ, Ludbrook A. Use of Discrete Choice Experiments to elicit preferences. Qual Health Care 2001 10 (Suppl. 1 S55 60.
34. Kennedy A, Gately C, Rogers A. Process evaluation of the EPP Report II: examination of the implementation of the Expert Patients Programme within the structures and locality contexts of the NHS in England (PREPP study). Available from: http://www.npcrdc.ac.uk/ [Accessed June 22, 2005 G, Gravelle H, Weatherly H, Ritchie G. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to support self-care: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005 21 : 423 32.
35. Viney R, Savage E, Louviere J. Empirical investigation of experimental design properties of Discrete Choice Experiments in health care. Health Econ 2005 14 : 349 62.
36. Gyrd-Hansen D. Willingness to pay for a QALY. Health Econ 2003 12 : 1049 60.
37. Cheraghi-Sohi S, Bower P, Mead N, et al. Making sense of patient priorities: applying discrete choice methods in primary care using "think aloud" technique. Fam Pract 2007 24 : 276 82.
38. Mallinson S. Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire. Soc Sci Med 2002 54 : 11 21.
39. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Application. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2000.
40. Hahn G, Shapiro S. A Catalogue and Computer Program for the Design and Analysis of Orthogonal Symmetric and Asymmetric Fractional Factorial Experiments. New York : General Electric Research and Development Centre, 1966.
41. Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving Welfare Estimates in Discrete Choice Experiments with Multiple Choice Options. 3rd Workshop Advancing the Methodology of Discrete Choice Experiements in Health Economics; 2005 6-7 July; University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. ECOMAS Research Unit.
42. Hanley N, Ryan M, Wright R. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. Health Econ 2003 12 : 3 16.
43. Kocur G, Adler T, Hyman W, Aunet B. Guide to Forecasting Travel Demand with Direct Utility Assessment. US Dept of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Report UMTA-NH-11-0001-82-1. Washington, DC : US Department of Transportation, 1982.
44. Carlsson F, Martinsson P. Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Econ 2003 12 : 281 94.
45. Phillips KA, Maddala T, Reed Johnson F. Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing. Health Serv Res 2002 37 : 1681 705.
46. Lancsar E, Louviere J. Deleting "irrational" responses from stated choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences 3rd Workshop Advancing the Methodology of Discrete Choice Experiements in Health Economics; 2005 6-7 July; University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. ECOMAS Research Unit.
47. Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from Discrete Choice Experiments: a response to Ryan and Santos Silva. Health Econ 2004 13 : 919 24.
48. Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from Discrete Choice Experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. Health Econ 2004 13 : 901 7.
49. Santos Silva JMC. Deriving welfare measures in Discrete Choice Experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (2). Health Econ 2004 13 : 913 18.
50. San Miguel F. Testing the Assumptions of Completeness, Stability and Rationality of Preferences in Health Economics Using Discrete Choice Experiments PhD Aberdeen : University: of Aberdeen, 2000.
51. San Miguel F, Ryan M, Amaya-Amaya M. Irrational" stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation. Health Econ 2005 14 : 307 22.
52. Bech M, Gyrd-Hansen D. Effects coding in Discrete Choice Experiments. Health Econ 2005 14 : 1079 83.
53. Richardson G, Bojke C. Incorporating "psychological" outcomes into cost-effectiveness analysis. HESG paper, York 2006 2006.
54. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Generalized linear mixed effects models. In : Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G, eds. Advances in Longitudinal Data Analysis. Boca Raton, FL : Chapman & Hall Press, 2006.
55. McIntosh EMR. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to derive welfare estimates for the provision of elective surgery: implications of discontinuous preferences. J Econ Psychol 2002 23 : 367 82.
56. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. A Social Tariff for EuroQol: Results from a UK General Population Survey. York : Centre for Health Economics, 1995.