Estimating preferences for a dermatology consultation using Best-Worst Scaling: Comparison of various methods of analysis

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Flynn, Terry N ^a   Louviere, Jordan J ^b   Peters, Tim J ^a   Coast, Joanna ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEST WORST SCALING; CONSULTATION; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMPIRICISM; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT CARE; POLICY; RATING SCALE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DERMATOLOGY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

DERMATOLOGY; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC MODELS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 57649139182     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-76     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. JJ Louviere DA Hensher J Swait, Stated choice methods: analysis and application Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000
2. Stated Preference and Choice Models Applied to Recreation Research: A Review. JJ Louviere HJP Timmermans, Leisure Sci 1990 12 9 32
3. Best-Worst Scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it. TN Flynn JJ Louviere TJ Peters J Coast, J Health Econ 2007 26 171 189 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002 16707175
4. Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. E Lancsar JJ Louviere TN Flynn, Soc Sci Med 2007 64 1738 1753 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.007 17257725
5. Some probabilistic models of Best, Worst, and Best-Worst choices. AAJ Marley JJ Louviere, J Math Psychol 2005 49 464 480 10.1016/j.jmp.2005.05.003
6. Determining the Appropriate Response to Evidence of Public Concern: The Case of Food Safety. A Finn JJ Louviere, J Public Policy Mark 1992 11 12 25
7. Separating weight and scale value: an exploration of best-attribute scaling in health economics. E McIntosh JJ Louviere, Health Economists' Study Group meeting Brunel University 2002
8. Using conjoint analysis to evaluate health state preferences. SL Szeinbach JH Barnes WF McGhan MM Murawski R Corey, Drug Inf J 1999 33 849 858
9. Using discrete choice experiments to go beyond clinical outcomes when evaluating clinical practice. M Ryan K Major D Skatun, J Eval Clin Pract 2005 11 328 338 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00539.x 16011645
10. What you don't know might hurt you: some unresolved issues in the design and analysis of discrete choice experiments. JJ Louviere, Environ Res Econ 2006 34 173 188 10.1007/s10640-005-4817-0
11. Modelling the choices of single individuals by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information. JJ Louviere DJ Street L Burgess N Wasi T Islam AAJ Marley, Journal of Choice Modelling 2008 1 128 163
12. Probabilistic Models of Set-Dependent and Attribute-Level Best-Worst Choice. AAJ Marley TN Flynn JJ Louviere, J Math Psychol 2008 52 281 296 10.1016/j.jmp.2008.02.002
13. Preferences for aspects of a dermatology consultation. J Coast C Salisbury D de Berker A Noble S Horrocks TJ Peters, British Journal of Dermatology 2006 155 387 392 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07328.x 16882179
14. Evaluation of a general practitioner with special interest service for dermatology: randomised controlled trial. C Salisbury A Noble S Horrocks Z Crosby V Harrison J Coast, BMJ 2005 331 1441 1446 16332728 10.1136/bmj.38670. 494734.7C
15. Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interests led dermatology service in primary care. J Coast S Noble A Noble S Horrocks O Asim TJ Peters, BMJ 2005 331 1444 1449 16339217 10.1136/bmj.38676.446910.7C
16. Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments: a case study using qualitative methods. J Coast S Horrocks, J Health Serv Res Pol 2007 12 25 30 10.1258/135581907779497602
17. Maximising responses to discrete choice experiments: a randomised trial. J Coast TN Flynn C Salisbury JJ Louviere TJ Peters, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 2006 5 249 260 10.2165/00148365-200605040-00006
18. Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data. JJ Louviere G Woodworth, J Marketing Res 1983 20 350 367 10.2307/3151440
19. Stata Statistical Software. [9SE]. Stata Corporation, College Station, TX 2005
20. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. E Lancsar E Savage, Health Econ 2004 13 901 907 10.1002/hec.870 15362181
21. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. M Bech D Gyrd-Hansen, Health Econ 2005 14 1079 1083 10.1002/hec.984 15852455
22. The relationship between Luce's Choice Axiom, Thurstone's Theory of Comparative Judgment, and the Double Exponential Distribution. JI Yellott, J Math Psychol 1977 15 109 144 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90026-8
23. Analysis of categorical data by linear models. J Grizzle CF Starmer GG Koch, Biometrics 1969 25 489 504 10.2307/2528901 5824401
24. Dermatology life quality index (DLQI) - a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. AY Finlay GK Khan, Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 1994 19 210 216 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01167.x
25. Modeling the Effects of Including/Excluding Attributes in Choice Experiments on Systematic and Random Components. JJ Louviere T Islam P Burke, Int J Res Mark 2007 24 289 300 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.04.002
26. What if consumer experiments impact variances as well as means: Response variability as a behavioural phenomenon. JJ Louviere, J Consum Res 2001 28 506 511 10.1086/323739