Approach-alcohol action tendencies can be inhibited by cognitive load

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 231, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 967-975

  Sharbanee, Jason M ^a   Stritzke, Werner G K ^a   Jamalludin, M Effin ^a   Wiers, Reinout W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Action tendency; Addiction; Alcohol; Approach avoidance; Inhibition; Interference suppression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ALCOHOL TASTE TEST; APPROACH ALCOHOL ACTION TENDENCY; APPROACH AVOIDANCE TASK; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERFERENCE SUPPRESSION; MALE; MENTAL LOAD; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ALCOHOL-RELATED DISORDERS; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COGNITION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOL-RELATED DISORDERS; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COGNITION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896733633     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: 14322072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-013-3318-z     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ambrose ML, Bowden SC, Whelan G (2001) Working memory impairments in alcohol-dependent participants without clinical amnesia. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 25(2):185-191
2. Aron AR (2007) The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist 13(3):214-228
3. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG (2002) The alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary care, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, New York
4. Barkby H, Dickson JM, Roper L, Field M (2012) To approach or avoid alcohol? Automatic and self-reported motivational tendencies in alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 36(2):361-368
5. Bishop SJ (2007) Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: an integrative account. Trends Cogn Sci 11(7):307-316
6. Brydges CR, Clunies-Ross K, Clohessy M, Lo ZL, Nguyen A, Rousset C, Whitelaw P et al (2012) Dissociable components of cognitive control: an event-related potential (ERP) study of response inhibition and interference suppression. PLoS ONE 7(3):e34482
7. Carey KB, Maisto SA, Carey MP, Purnine DM (2001) Measuring readiness-to-change substance misuse among psychiatric outpatients: I. Reliability and validity of self-report measures. J Stud Alcohol 62(1):79-88
8. Christiansen P, Cole JC, Goudie AJ, Field M (2012) Components of behavioural impulsivity and automatic cue approach predict unique variance in hazardous drinking. Psychopharmacology 219(2):501-510
9. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey
10. Conway A, Kane M, Bunting M, Hambrick D, Wilhelm O, & Engle R (2005) Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and user's guide. Psychon Bull Rev 12(5):769-786
11. Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18(1):193-222
12. Deutsch R, Strack F (2006) Reflective and impulsive determinants of addictive behavior. In: Wiers RW, Stacy AW (eds) Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 45-57
13. Van Dillen LF, Heslenfeld DJ, Koole SL (2009) Tuning down the emotional brain: an fMRI study of the effects of cognitive load on the processing of affective images. NeuroImage 45(4):1212-1219
14. Van Dillen LF, Koole SL (2007) Clearing the mind: a working memory model of distraction from negative mood. Emotion 7(4):715-723
15. Van Dillen L F, Papies E K & Hofmann W (2012) Turning a blind eye to temptation: how cognitive load can facilitate self-regulation. J Personal 104(3):427-443
16. Dimeff LA, Linehan M (2008) Dialectical behavior therapy for substance abusers. Addict Sci Clin Pract 4(2):39
17. Eberl C, Wiers R W, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker E. S., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2012). Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 4:38-51
18. Epler AJ, Kivlahan DR, Bush KR, Dobie DJ, Bradley KA (2005) A brief readiness to change drinking algorithm: concurrent validity in female VA primary care patients. Addict Behav 30(2):389-395
19. Erk S, Kleczar A, Walter H (2007) Valence-specific regulation effects in a working memory task with emotional context. NeuroImage 37(2):623-632
20. Friedman NP, Miyake A (2004) The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen 133(1):101-135
21. Gladwin TE, Figner B, Crone EA, Wiers RW (2011) Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 1(4):364-376
22. Harnishfeger KK (1995) The development of cognitive inhibition: theories, definitions, and research evidence. In: Dempster FN, Brainerd CJ (eds) Interference and inhibition in cognition. Academic, San Diego, pp 175-204
23. Van Hemel-Ruiter ME, de Jong PJ, Wiers RW (2011) Appetitive and regulatory processes in young adolescent drinkers. Addict Behav 36(1-2):18-26
24. Houben K, Wiers RW (2008) Measuring implicit alcohol associations via the internet: validation of web-based implicit association tests. Behav Res Methods 40(4):1134-1143
25. Koob GF, Volkow ND (2010) Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 35(1):217-238
26. Krank MD, Wall A-M (2006) Context and retrieval effects on implicit cognitions for substance use. In: Wiers RW, Stacy AW (eds) Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 281-292
27. Kreusch F, Vilenne A & Quertemont E. (2013). Response inhibition toward alcohol-related cues using an alcohol go/no-go task in problem and non-problem drinkers. Addictive Behaviors 38(10):2520-2528
28. Lawrence AJ, Luty J, Bogdan NA, Sahakian BJ, Clark L (2009) Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling. Psychopharmacology 207(1):163-172
29. Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K, Yang L-X, Ecker U (2010) A working memory test battery for MATLAB. Behav Res Methods 42(2):571-585
30. Linehan M (1993) Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. Guilford, New York
31. Logan GD, Zbrodoff NJ (1979) When it helps to be misled: facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Mem Cogn 7(3):166-174
32. MacLeod CM (1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull 109(2):163-203
33. Mathews A, & Mackintosh B (1998) A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cogn Ther Res 22(6):539-560
34. McClure SM, Botvinick MM, Yeung N, Greene JD, Cohen JD (2007) Conflict monitoring in cognition-emotion competition. In: Gross JJ (ed) Handbook of emotion regulation. Guilford, New York, pp 204-226
35. McEvoy PM, Stritzke WGK, French DJ, Lang AR, Ketterman RL (2004) Comparison of three models of alcohol craving in young adults: a cross-validation. Addiction 99(4):482-497
36. Van der Meer T, Te Grotenhuis M, Pelzer B (2010) Influential cases in multilevel modeling. Am Sociol Rev 75(1):173-178
37. Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24(1):167-202
38. Miyake A, Friedman NP (2012) The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 21(1):8-14
39. Miyake A, Shah P (1999) Toward unified theories of working memory: emerging general consensus, unresolved theoretical issues, and future research directions. In: Miyake A, Shah P (eds) Models of working memory: mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 443-481
40. Munakata Y, Herd SA, Chatham CH, Depue BE, Banich MT, O'Reilly RC (2011) A unified framework for inhibitory control. Trends Cogn Sci 15(10):453-459
41. Nederkoorn C, Baltus M, Guerrieri R, Wiers RW (2009) Heavy drinking is associated with deficient response inhibition in women but not in men. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 93(3):331-336
42. Nigg J (2000) On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychol Bull 126(2):220-246
43. Noël X, Van Der Linden M, D'Acremont M, Bechara A, Dan B, Hanak C, Verbanck P (2007) Alcohol cues increase cognitive impulsivity in individuals with alcoholism. Psychopharmacology 192(2):291-298
44. Noël X, Van der Linden M, Brevers D, Campanella S, Verbanck P, Hanak C, Kornreich C, et al (2012) Separating intentional inhibition of prepotent responses and resistance to proactive interference in alcohol-dependent individuals. Drug Alcohol Depend 128(3):200-205
45. Peeters M, Monshouwer K, van de Schoot R A G J, Janssen T, Vollebergh W A M, & Wiers R W (2013) Automatic processes and the drinking behavior in early adolescence: a prospective study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 37(10):1737-1744
46. Peeters M, Wiers RW, Monshouwer K, van de Schoot R, Janssen T, Vollebergh WAM (2012) Automatic processes in at-risk adolescents: the role of alcohol-approach tendencies and response inhibition in drinking behavior. Addiction 107(11):1939-1946
47. Pieters S, Burk WJ, Van der Vorst H, Wiers RW, Engels RCME (2012) The moderating role of working memory capacity and alcohol-specific rule-setting on the relation between approach tendencies and alcohol use in young adolescents. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 36(5):915-922
48. Rinck M, Becker ES (2007) Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 38(2):105-120
49. Schneider W, Shiffrin RM (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev 84(1):1-66
50. Sharbanee J M, Stritzke W. G K, Wiers R W & MacLeod C (2013a) Alcohol-related biases in selective attention and action tendencies make distinct contributions to dysregulated drinking behaviour. Addiction 108(10):1758-1766
51. Sharbanee J M, Stritzke W G, Wiers R W, Young P, Rinck M, & MacLeod C. (2013b) The interaction of approach-alcohol action tendencies, working memory capacity, and current task goals predicts the inability to regulate drinking behavior. Psychol Addict Behav 27(3):649-661
52. Sternberg S (1966) High-speed scanning in human memory. Science 153(3736):652-654
53. Watson P, de Wit S, Hommel B, Wiers RW (2012) Motivational mechanisms and outcome expectancies underlying the approach bias toward addictive substances. Frontiers in Cognition 3:440
54. West BT (2009) Analyzing longitudinal data with the linear mixed models procedure in SPSS. Eval Health Prof 32(3):207-228
55. Wendt M, Luna-Rodriguez A (2009) Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference. Experimental Psychology (formerly "Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie") 56(3):206-217
56. Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenberg E, Thush C, Engels RCME, Sher KJ, Grenard J et al (2007) Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86(2):263-283
57. Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J (2011) Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci 22(4):490-497
58. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Kordts R, Houben K, Strack F (2010) Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction 105(2):279-287
59. Wiers RW, Stacy AW (2006) Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Sage, Thousand Oaks