The interaction of approach-alcohol action tendencies, working memory capacity, and current task goals predicts the inability to regulate drinking behavior

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 649-661

  Sharbanee, Jason M ^a   Stritzke, Werner G K ^a   Wiers, Reinout W ^b   Young, Paul ^a   Rinck, Mike ^c   MacLeod, Colin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Action tendency; Alcohol; Approach avoidance task; Working memory capacity

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ALCOHOLISM; APPETITE; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GOAL ATTAINMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PREDICTION; SELF CONTROL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; WORKING MEMORY;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; CUES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883687838     PISSN: 0893164X     EISSN: 19391501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0029982     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Ambrose, M. L., Bowden, S. C., & Whelan, G. (2001). Working memory impairments in alcohol-dependent participants without clinical amnesia. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 25, 185-191. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2001.tb02197.x
2. Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (2002). The alcohol use disorders identification test: Guidelines for use in primary care (2nd ed.). New York, NY: World Health Organization.
3. Barkby, H., Dickson, J. M., Roper, L., & Field, M. (2012). To approach or avoid alcohol?. Automatic and self-reported motivational tendencies in alcohol dependence. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36, 361-368. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01620.x
4. Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553-573. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553
5. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5. 1252
6. Bechara, A. (2005). Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: A neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1458-1463. doi:10.1038/nn1584
7. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
8. Botvinick, M., Braver, T. S., Yeung, N., Ullsperger, M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Conflict monitoring: Computational and empirical studies. In M.I. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 91-102). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9. Broadway, J. M., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2010). Working memory capacity: Self-control is (in) the goal. Self control in society, mind, and brain (Vol. 1, pp. 163-174). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10. Burgess, G. C., & Braver, T. S. (2010). Neural mechanisms of interference control in working memory: Effects of interference expectancy and fluid intelligence. PLoS ONE, 5, e12861. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012861
11. Cahalan, D., Cisin, I. H., & Crossley, H. M. (1969). American drinking practices: A national study of drinking behavior and attitudes. Monographs of the Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.
12. Carey, K. B., Maisto, S. A., Carey, M. P., & Purnine, D. M. (2001). Measuring readiness-to-change substance misuse among psychiatric outpatients: I. Reliability and validity of self-report measures. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 79-88.
13. Christiansen, P., Cole, J. C., Goudie, A. J., & Field, M. (2012). Components of behavioural impulsivity and automatic cue approach predict unique variance in hazardous drinking. Psychopharmacology, 219, 501-510. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2396-z
14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332
16. Conway, A., Kane, M., Bunting, M., Hambrick, D., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769-786.
17. Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006
18. Cruz, J. E., Emery, R. E., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Peer network drinking predicts increased alcohol use from adolescence to early adulthood after controlling for genetic and shared environmental selection. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1390-1402. doi:10.1037/a0027515
19. de Wit, H. (2009). Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: A review of underlying processes. Addiction Biology, 14, 22-31. doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x
20. Dunbar, K., & MacLeod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 622. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.622
21. Epler, A. J., Kivlahan, D. R., Bush, K. R., Dobie, D. J., & Bradley, K. A. (2005). A brief readiness to change drinking algorithm: Concurrent validity in female VA primary care patients. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 389-395. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.05.015
22. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in experimental social psychology, 23, 75-109. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4
23. Field, M., Kiernan, A., Eastwood, B., & Child, R. (2008). Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39, 209-218. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.06. 001
24. Field, M., Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2005). Craving and cognitive biases for alcohol cues in social drinkers. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 40, 504-510. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agh213
25. Field, M., Wiers, R. W., Christiansen, P., Fillmore, M. T., & Verster, J. C. (2010). Acute alcohol effects on inhibitory control and implicit cognition: Implications for loss of control over drinking. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 34, 1346-1352.
26. Finn, P. R. (2002). Motivation, working memory, and decision making: A cognitive-motivational theory of personality vulnerability to alcoholism. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1, 183-205. doi: 10.1177/1534582302001003001
27. Frewen, P. A., Dozois, D. J. A., Joanisse, M. F., & Neufeld, R. W. J. (2008). Selective attention to threat versus reward: Meta-analysis and neural-network modeling of the dot-probe task. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 307-337. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.05.006
28. Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Wanke, M. (2008). When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 397-419.
29. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Frijda, N. H. (2010). Impulsive action and motivation. Biological Psychology, 84, 570-579. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.005
31. Gazzaley, A., & Nobre, A. C. (2012). Top-down modulation: Bridging selective attention and working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 129-135. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.014
32. Gladwin, T. E., Figner, B., Crone, E. A., & Wiers, R. W. (2011). Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 364-376. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.06.008
33. Goldman, M. S. (2002). Expectancy and risk for alcoholism: The unfortunate exploitation of a fundamental characteristic of neurobehavioral adaptation. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 26, 737-746. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2002.tb02599.x
34. Grenard, J. L., Ames, S. L., Wiers, R. W., Thush, C., Sussman, S., & Stacy, A. W. (2008). Working memory capacity moderates the predictive effects of drug-related associations on substance use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 426-432. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.426
35. Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924-936. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.3. 924
36. Heather, N. (1998). A conceptual framework for explaining drug addiction. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 12, 3-7. doi:10.1177/026988119801200101
37. Hettema, J., Steele, J., & Miller, W. R. (2005). Motivational Interviewing. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 91-111. doi:10.1146/annurev .clinpsy.1.102803.143833
38. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Roefs, A. (2009). Three ways to resist temptation: The independent contributions of executive attention, inhibitory control, and affect regulation to the impulse control of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 431-435. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008. 09.013
39. Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Friese, M., Wiers, R. W., & Schmitt, M. (2008). Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: Toward an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 962-977. doi:10.1037/a0012705
40. Hofmann, W., Rauch, W., & Gawronski, B. (2007). And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 497-504. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.004
41. Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., Friese, M., & Baddeley, A. D. (2011). Working memory and self-regulation. Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 204-225). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
42. Hou, R., Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Moss-Morris, R., Peveler, R., & Roefs, A. (2011). External eating, impulsivity and attentional bias to food cues. Appetite, 56, 424-427. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.019
43. Houben, K., Wiers, R. W., & Jansen, A. (2011). Getting a grip on drinking behavior: Training working memory to reduce alcohol abuse. Psychological Science, 22, 968-975. doi:10.1177/0956797611412392
44. Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In R.A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21-46). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45. Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 317-324. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002
46. Kokotailo, P. K., Egan, J., Gangnon, R., Brown, D., Mundt, M., & Fleming, M. (2004). Validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test in college students. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 28, 914-920. doi:10.1097/01.ALC.0000128239.87611.F5
47. Krank, M. D., & Wall, A-M. (2006). Context and retrieval effects on implicit cognitions for substance use. In R.W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 281-292). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
48. Lang, P. J., & Bradley, M. M. (2008). Appetitive and defensive motivation is the substrate of emotion. In A.J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 51-66). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
49. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., Yang, L-X., & Ecker, U. (2010). A working memory test battery for MATLAB. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 571-585. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.571
50. Loeber, S., Duka, T., Welzel, H., Nakovics, H., Heinz, A., Flor, H., & Mann, K. (2009). Impairment of cognitive abilities and decision making after chronic use of alcohol: The impact of multiple detoxifications. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 44, 372-381. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agp030
51. MacLeod, C., Koster, E. H. W., & Fox, E. (2009). Whither cognitive bias modification research?. Commentary on the special section articles. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 89-99. doi:10.1037/a0014878
52. Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (1998). A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 539-560.
53. Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 331-354. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000518
54. McClure, S. M., Botvinick, M. M., Yeung, N., Greene, J. D., & Cohen, J. D. (2007). Conflict monitoring in cognition-emotion competition. In J.J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 204-226). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
55. McEvoy, P. M., Stritzke, W. G. K., French, D. J., Lang, A. R., & Ketterman, R. L. (2004). Comparison of three models of alcohol craving in young adults: A cross-validation. Addiction, 99, 482-497. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443. 2004.00714.x
56. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
57. Miller, W., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). London, UK: Guilford Press.
58. Miller, W. R., & Tonigan, J. S. (1996). Assessing drinkers' motivation for change: The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 10, 81-89. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.10.2.81
59. Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Toward unified theories of working memory: Emerging general consensus, unresolved theoretical issues, and future research directions. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 442-482). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174909.016
60. Monti, P. M., & MacKillop, J. (2007). Advances in the treatment of craving for alcohol and tobacco. In P.M. Miller & D. J. Kavanagh (Eds.), Translation of addictions science into practice (pp. 211-237). San Diego, CA: Pergamon. doi:10.1016/B978-008044927-2/50060-2
61. Nulsen, C. E., Fox, A., & Hammond, G. (2010). Differential effects of ecstasy on short-term and working memory: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 20, 21-32. doi:10.1007/s11065-009-9124-z
62. Nulsen, C., Fox, A., & Hammond, G. (2011). Electrophysiological indices of altered working memory processes in long-term ecstasy users. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 26, 488-497. doi: 10.1002/hup.1231
63. O'Reilly, R. C., & Frank, M. J. (2006). Making working memory work: A computational model of learning in the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Neural Computation, 18, 283-328. doi:10.1162/089976606775093909
64. Ostafin, B. D., Marlatt, G. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2008). Drinking without thinking: An implicit measure of alcohol motivation predicts failure to control alcohol use. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 1210-1219. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2008.08.003
65. Ostafin, B. D., & Palfai, T. P. (2006). Compelled to consume: The implicit association test and automatic alcohol motivation. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 322-327. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.20.3.322
66. Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. D. (2003). Alcohol-related motivational tendencies in hazardous drinkers: Assessing implicit response tendencies using the modified-IAT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 1149-1162. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00018-4
67. Peeters, M., Wiers, R. W., Monshouwer, K., van de Schoot, R.,, Janssen, T., & Vollebergh, W. A. M. (2012). Automatic processes in at-risk adolescents: The role of alcohol-approach tendencies and response inhibition in drinking behavior. Addiction, 107, 1939-1946. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012. 03948.x
68. Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 105-120. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001
69. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247-291. doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P
70. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2003). Addiction. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 25. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145237
71. Rohsenow, D. J., Monti, P. M., Rubonis, A. V., Gulliver, S. B., Colby, S. M., Binkoff, J. A., & Abrams, D. B. (2001). Cue exposure with coping skills training and communication skills training for alcohol dependence: 6-and 12-month outcomes. Addiction, 96, 1161-1174. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001. 96811619.x
72. Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., De La Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993. tb02093.x
73. Schmeichel, B. J., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2010). Exercising self-control increases approach motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 162. doi:10.1037/a0019797
74. Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Gonsalkorale, K., Hugenberg, K., Allen, T. J., & Groom, C. J. (2008). The self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses. Psychological Review, 115, 314-335. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.314
75. Stritzke, W. G. K., McEvoy, P. M., Wheat, L. R., Dyer, K. R., & French, D. J. (2007). The yin and yang of indulgence and restraint: The ambivalence model of craving. Motivation of Health Behavior, 31-47.
76. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
77. Tapert, S. F., Schweinsburg, A. D., Barlett, V. C., Brown, S. A., Frank, L. R., Brown, G. G., & Meloy, M. J. (2004). Blood oxygen level dependent response and spatial working memory in adolescents with alcohol use disorders. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 28, 1577-1586. doi:10.1097/01.ALC.0000141812.81234.A6
78. Thush, C., Wiers, R. W., Ames, S. L., Grenard, J. L., Sussman, S., & Stacy, A. W. (2008). Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 94, 116-124. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.10.019
79. Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 53-67. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.53
80. Tonigan, J. S. (2003). Issues in alcohol treatment outcome assessment. In J.P. Allen & V. B. Wilson (Eds.), Assessing alcohol problems: A guide for clinicians and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 219-233). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
81. Townshend, J. M., & Duka, T. (2005). Binge drinking, cognitive performance and mood in a population of young social drinkers. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 317-325. doi:10.1097/01.ALC.0000156453. 05028.F5
82. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5
83. van Hemel-Ruiter, M. E., de Jong, P. J., & Wiers, R. W. (2011). Appetitive and regulatory processes in young adolescent drinkers. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 18-26. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.002
84. Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer series in statistics. New York, NY: Springer.
85. Verdejo-García, A., Lawrence, A. J., & Clark, L. (2008). Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: Review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 777- 810. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.11.003
86. Volkow, N. D., Wang, G-J., Fowler, J. S., Tomasi, D., Telang, F., & Baler, R. (2010). Addiction: Decreased reward sensitivity and increased expectation sensitivity conspire to overwhelm the brain's control circuit. BioEssays, 32, 748-755. doi:10.1002/bies.201000042
87. West, B. T. (2009). Analyzing longitudinal data with the linear mixed models procedure in SPSS. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 32, 207-228. doi:10.1177/0163278709338554
88. West, B. T., Welch, K. B., & Galecki, A. T. (2007). Linear mixed models: A practical guide using statistical software. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
89. Wiers, R. W., Bartholow, B. D., van den Wildenberg, E., Thush, C., Engels, R. C. M. E., Sher, K. J., Stacy, A. W. (2007). Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: A review and a model. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 86, 263-283. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2006.09.021
90. Wiers, R. W., Eberl, C., Rinck, M., Becker, E. S., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2011). Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science, 22, 490-497. doi:10.1177/0956797611400615
91. Wiers, R. W., Rinck, M., Dictus, M., & Van Den Wildenberg, E. (2009). Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes, Brain & Behavior, 8, 101-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00454.x
92. Wiers, R. W., Rinck, M., Kordts, R., Houben, K., & Strack, F. (2010). Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction, 105, 279 -287. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02775.x
93. Wiers, R. W., Schoenmakers, T., Houben, K., Thush, C., Fadardi, J. S., & Cox, W. M. (2008). Can problematic alcohol use be trained away?. New behavioural treatments aimed at changing and moderating implicit cognitive processes in alcohol abuse. In C.R. Martin (Ed.), Identification and treatment of alcohol dependency (pp. 187-208). Keswick, UK: M&K Publishing.
94. Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3-24. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3