A novel colonoscopy reporting system enabling quality assurance

Endoscopy

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 181-187

  Van Doorn, Sascha C ^a   Van Vliet, Joost ^b   Fockens, Paul ^a,c   Dekker, Evelien ^a,c  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Olympus Nederland BV   (Netherlands)

^c Center for Colonoscopy   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CECUM INTUBATION; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLONOSCOPY REPORTING SYSTEM; COLORECTAL CANCER; ENDOSCOPIST; FAMILY HISTORY; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ADENOMA; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CECUM; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

ADENOMA; CECUM; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84896722807     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1364877     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Zauber A. G., Winawer S. J., O'Brien M. J. et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med: 2012; 366 687 696
2. Singh H., Nugent Z., Demers A. A. et al. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology: 2010; 139 1128 1137
3. Bressler B., Paszat L. F., Vinden C. et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology: 2004; 127 452 456
4. Baxter N. N., Goldwasser M. A., Paszat L. F. et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med: 2009; 150 1 8
5. Brenner H., Hoffmeister M., Arndt V. et al. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst: 2010; 102 89 95
6. Bressler B., Paszat L. F., Zhongliang C. et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology: 2007; 132 96 102
7. Van Rijn J. C., Reitsma J. B., Stoker J. et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 343 350
8. Kaminski M. F., Regula J., Kraszewska E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med: 2010; 362 1795 1803
9. Rex D. K., Petrini J. L., Baron T. H. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 873 885
10. National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Endoscopy Quality Assurance Group Quality assurance guidelines for colonoscopy publication no. 6. National Health Service: 2011; http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/ publications/nhsbcsp06.pdf
11. RIVM National Institute for Public Health and the Environment NVMDL (Netherlands Association of Gastroenterohepatologists) Protocol for the authorization and auditing of colonoscopy centres and endoscopists - National screening programme for bowel cancer - the Netherlands. Version 1: 06 2012; http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=rivmp:186626&type= org&disposition=inline
12. Barclay R. L., Vicari J. J., Doughty A. S. et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med: 2006; 355 2533 2541
13. Harewood G. C., Sharma V. K., de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc: 2003; 58 76 79
14. Robertson D. J., Lawrence L. B., Shaheen N. J. et al. Quality of colonoscopy reporting: a process of care study. Am J Gastroenterol: 2002; 97 2651 2656
15. Li J., Nadel M. R., Poppell C. F. et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: results from a statewide cancer screening program. Diagn Ther Endosc: 2010; pii: 419796
16. Lieberman D., Nadel M., Smith R. A. et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc: 2007; 65 757 766
17. Lieberman D. A., Faigel D. O., Logan J. R. et al. Assessment of quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multi-center consortium. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 645 653
18. Beaulieu D., Barkun A., Martel M. Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol: 2012; 18 3551 3557
19. de Jonge V., Sint Nicolaas J., Cahen D. L. et al. Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc: 2012; 75 98 106
20. Froehlich F., Wietlisbach V., Gonvers J. J. et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc: 2005; 61 378 384
21. Taber A., Romagnuolo J. Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 71 782 786
22. de Wijkerslooth T. R., de Haan M. C., Stoop E. M. et al. Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial. Gut: 2012; 61 1552 1559
23. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology: 2002; 96 1004 1017
24. Rostom A., Ross E. D., Dubé C. et al. Development and validation of a nurse-assessed patient comfort score for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2013; 77 255 261
25. Endoscopic Classification Review Group Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy: 2005; 37 570 578
26. Coe S. G., Panjalab C., Heckman M. G. et al. Quality in colonoscopy reporting: An assessment of compliance and performance improvement. Dig Liver Dis: 2012; 44 660 664